I hold that all human beings everywhere are of equal worth and dignity and that my people are not worth any less or any more. To me it seems bizarre, even stupid, to hold otherwise. I reject all political visions, narratives, and policy agendas that are incompatible with this.
Some people are going to call me an "idealist" (as if that's a slur), or "naive" (when I'm pretty sure I'm smarter than three of them put together). I call myself a human being who understand who he is, who his people are, and who human beings are. It's not complicated.
It's not complicated, but what it entails is made complex by the terrible legacy we have inherited. We didn't choose the past and the past gave us the present - a world brimming with injustice and inequality and a world order that upholds it. Still, a reflection of human ego.
If you give me a policy agenda that solves a problem in one country or community by treating human beings as collateral damage in another, not only will I reject it, I'll be positively hostile towards you, your policy, and whoever else agrees with you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lately when sitting in silence, in meditation or in prayer, I get this sense of detachment from the ego, as though Iyad is a false self that I'm inhabiting. As though I'm not really Iyad but I'm looking through his eyes
It feels like Iyad isn't essential and isn't really that important. He's a good ego but he's just an ego. He has his own story and so does everyone else and theirs are as valid as his. He doesn't get to pursue his story at anyone's expense, or they at his.
This detachment seems to be persistent. It's heightened when I sit in silence, but carries over throughout the day. It doesn't feel distressing or bizarre, like PTSD dissociation episodes. Rather, it feels warm, wise, and matter-of-fact, and leaves a feeling of deep gratitude.
What's the worst thing Trump can do in his last week in office?
Quick thoughts. Trump is many things but "brave" isn't one of them. He will walk back from incitement because he realizes the extent of his legal exposure. He had a plan and it failed, he knows he can't overturn the election.
That said his efforts will now turn to protecting himself. The worst thing he can do, in my opinion, is destroy evidence and/or deepen the grift by acting on behalf of other actors who he thinks can protect him (or that he fears have leverage over him)
Stream of consciousness thread. Excuse the typos coz I'm not reviewing and not editing, just tweeting as it comes
I think what's happening in the United States is that the country is correcting its identity. The United States for many of its people was already and since its founding a white supremacist country. The United States is adopting a new identity and those left behind are rebelling
Just check what happened last year. Monuments being torn down = old heroes being abandoned. Sports clubs and military bases being renamed. What it means to be an America is being renegotiated by a new generation who are appealing to the promise of equality under one nation
Some morning thoughts: Going from the power of large corporations to the power of large governments doesn't really solve the problem, just like going from the power of large governments to the power of large corporations doesn't solve the problem
It's true that governments can (and should) be far more democratic than corporations, but if we learned anything from the last 5 years it's that even well-established democracies can be taken over by extremists. The more powerful the government, the more damage they can do
Imagine if Twitter was "nationalized" in 2015 and then Trump elected in 2016. Like I said above, going from all-powerful corporations to all-power governments, or the reverse, doesn't solve the problem.
The fact that so many people interpret platform moderation as "censorship" shows just how poorly the average person understands the fundamentals of free speech and the public sphere. So many people seem to have an 8th grader's understanding at best.
Forget the government vs private platform distinction; even with the legal right to free speech, "free" does not mean "absolute". Even in the US, free speech stops at a constitutionally drawn line, "imminent lawless action".
And that's a government. Platforms like Twitter are governed by another paradigm, that of the public sphere. A healthy public sphere is meritocratic, facts-based, inclusive, competitive, and representative. We don't have to be at 100% health but we can try for 51%.
Here's the thing. Sunlight isn't always the best disinfectant, sometimes it just makes the weeds grow thicker and stronger by giving them legitimacy and a platform
Good ideas don't always drive out bad ideas, otherwise we wouldn't be here 70+ years after the fall of the Third Reich still arguing against literal Nazis. Some bad ideas live as zombies because people aren't always rational
And don't @ me, I lost my country and livelihood and nearly lost my life for the sake of my right to free speech, I won't be lectured by those who never as much skipped lunch for their right to free speech