German TV (@WDR) and car industry (@AudiOfficial) lying about electric vehicles. Again. See picture.
An official looking TV clip is making its ways to Audi car salesmen with points against electric vehicles that are simply wrong. Let me explain in a short thread.
This graph from the thread summarizes my criticism.
Authors defense tells us that H2 only wins IF:
- We exclude newest industry data AND
- We exclude batteries not made in Asia AND
- We assume batteries are dumped while in perfect shape AND
- We assume H2 electricity emits 4x less CO2
I might have been the one pointing this out most forcefully and precisely but I was far from the only one and there are many studies since then. That this is still used means either a journalist that wants to distort or one that doesn't have a clue. Either way it's unacceptable.
As for @HaraldLesch: he seems to embody the classic example of the physics professor who thinks he knows everything better. E.g. in this anti-EV video the grid is overloaded by one million people charging at the same time on 350kW super fast chargers. Haha
In reality 90% of charging doesn't happen with a fast charger and you only charge once every few days and not at the same time. It's all such utter bollox. But he is very popular so the video was watched 3 million times!
In the WDR clip he says we much research the negative impact of lithium batteries better. But has he ever read this 300 page study of the EU by Ricardo that goes in great depth regarding that? ricardo.com/news-and-media…
Probably not: it would just upset his priors.
All in all: that we still find this kind of misinformation doing the rounds points to many people who really don't want to hear the combustion engine is history. I think fuel cells for cars are mostly a way to muddy the waters.
Anyway: please don't believe this clip.
I must apologize. Somewhat
I know my calculations are correct but the ones I criticize are from a brand new Fraunhofer ISI study. It has a layered structure with studies based on studies based on studies
I studied political science and it seems to me US democracy has become a reality soap with imagined grievances and tribalism more important for most people than democratic norms. And utterly irresponsible politicians will be able to run again with not even a slap on the wrist.
For me the root cause is irresponsible voters who think they can behave like hooligans at a football game. Who think politics is entertainment and they can just vote with their gut. Who are so insecure, coddled and entitled that they think they can choose their own facts.
The @guardian has a new piece on the well known problems related to electric vehicles, solar and wind.
I think the focus on resource use and responsible mining is great. As long as we also remind ourselves that fossil fuels are worse. theguardian.com/environment/20…
Remember that a car burns ~ 25 000 liters of fossil fuel over its lifetime. Do you really think that's better than 200 kg battery materials that's recyclable? And cobalt is also used for cleaning fossil fuel.
Apart from climate change the amount of ecosystem degradation, direct human suffering, conflict and corruption due to oil is much larger but that apparently generates less clicks. doi.org/10.1111/rode.1…
First I should be more precise:
- This is for the German situation.
- It looks at the price for farmers.
- There are large differences between types of meat and whether they are produced conventionally or organically.
This table shows the emissions per foodstuff in kg CO2eq per kg of foodstuff:
Beef 37 kg
Poultry 16-20 kg
Pork 6-10 kg
Eggs 1-2 kg
Milk 1 kg
Cereal 0.2-0.4 kg
Fruit 0.2-0.3 kg
Root crops 0.1 kg
Vegetables 0.0 kg
The report is very friendly about gasoline and diesel bc it conforms to official tests that we know are too optimistic about exhaust (e.g. from #dieselgate) but even then it just claims the problem won't go away when using EVs although there's a small but significant improvement.