I understand the reason why students (and faculty!) ask me how long does it take me to read and engage deeply with the materials I read. Generally speaking I'm a very, very, very fast reader. But when I really need to absorb the material in great depth, I am relatively slow.
My own students ask me "how long should it take me to prepare for your course?" -- I believe this question comes from the notion of credit-hours: to prepare for a 4 credits class, you should, in theory,
... devote one hour of preparation per class hour.
When I taught math (differential and integral calculus, multiple variables calculus and differential equations), I always told my students they had to study for 3 hours per hour of class. Not that I thought it was a great idea.
But I just carried on from when I took calculus myself, and from when I took Quantitative Methods during my PhD. I was young and naive.
I think that it is really, really hard to tell how long it will take me as a professor/educator to prepare a class, and same for a student.
We all read at different speeds, we absorb, memorize, comprehend material at varying velocities, and in the case of practical (computational, quantitative, or qualitative) skills, it takes even longer. That's also what has driven me to DRASTICALLY REDUCE my courses' reading load
In my experience (YMMV) students engage better with fewer readings raulpacheco.org/2020/10/teachi… this may also be partly because they can allocate their time in a way that is efficient, where they devote 2 hours to reading one article, but it's REALLY in depth, rather than quick skim.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: I was asked for references on how to use ethnographic field notes in the actual writing of a paper, and how they should be reported.
Interestingly, most of the work I've read on field notes is on "how to craft them" and "how to analyze them", not "how to report them".
On developing an ethnographic sensibility and learning how to write field notes, I’ve found books most useful.
What I want to make clear is that using excerpts from your interviews and ethnographic field notes is common in the actual writing of the ethnography.
If you are teaching ethnography, and you want to educate your students on how they can use their field notes when writing up their results/analysis/discussion sections, I believe you need to use 2 strategies first.
In a previous thread I indicated that in the same way that we need a repertoire of reading strategies, we also need to recognize the different types of articles, book chapters and books we read.
In this thread I’ll showcase several types.
1) this piece about shadowing of political elites is one of my favourites - it’s in @polanalysis (a rather quantitative journal), focuses on a qualitative method (shadowing) and is by one of my favourite political scientists (@jenniferbussell)
I started with the Abstract.
Reading the first page took me just a few minutes and I can gain a lot of insight already.
I marked sentences that I’d like to quote directly (definition of shadowing, how it works). These direct quotations can go in a Cornell Note, CSED row or Everything Notebook or index card
THREAD: Teaching students how to differentiate among various types of reading materials is important, not only for students but also for those of us who are educators.
For example, these papers are specific to “methods”: they describe a method (or a type of innovation to make a method work)
I always tell my students to avoid doing an AIC with methods papers. Instead do a meso-level or medium-level read: look for major themes, ideas, concepts.
These are “empirical” papers: authors apply or develop a new method which then is implemented in a case study, comparative examination or dataset.
Empirical papers, in my view, can be first quickly read using AIC and LATER, do a second round of in-depth reading.
THREAD: On a strategy to skim articles (for undergraduates).
Several fellow professors (@drheather_smith@EJMcCann among others) have told me that they find my Reading Strategies resource page slightly advanced for undergraduates. This might be the case (and may apply to ESL)
The above said, I DO have a page with Reading Strategies that is specific for Undergraduate Students (see here - raulpacheco.org/resources/reso…)
When I teach how to read (whether it is to my own undergrad and grad students, or to my research assistants), I always recommend (undergrad or grad) doing a quick skim, THEN a second round.
DISCLOSURE: I paid for this book stand with my hard earned and very devalued Mexican pesos. I bought it for $499 Mexican pesos (circa $23 USD) at Costco but I looked for it this weekend and I couldn’t find them anymore (I should have bought 3. Two for my home offices, one FLACSO.
A couple of features will be intuitive like this flexible adjustment contraption in the back. This book stand comes without any instructions and there is only one YouTube video and it doesn’t give much explanation.
The feature that was NOT intuitive at all and took me a while to move from locked to unlocked and back was the adjustable base that holds books and papers. That takes a while to tinker with but once you get it, locking and unlocking is easy peasy breeze.