THREAD: I was asked for references on how to use ethnographic field notes in the actual writing of a paper, and how they should be reported.
Interestingly, most of the work I've read on field notes is on "how to craft them" and "how to analyze them", not "how to report them".
On developing an ethnographic sensibility and learning how to write field notes, I’ve found books most useful.
What I want to make clear is that using excerpts from your interviews and ethnographic field notes is common in the actual writing of the ethnography.
If you are teaching ethnography, and you want to educate your students on how they can use their field notes when writing up their results/analysis/discussion sections, I believe you need to use 2 strategies first.
2) Teach them how to make authors dialogue with their own work.
The best book I've used to teach how to write analytically (and craft good arguments and learn how to put authors in dialogue with our own research) is Graf & Birkenstein raulpacheco.org/2017/05/they-s…
Personally, these four books taught me a lot about how to create and write my own fieldnotes. And yes I vastly prefer Van Maanen over Emerson et al.
What I enjoy about these books is that they offer lessons on crafting field notes and also writing the ethnography itself.
On actual ethnographic writing my favourites are Ghodsee and Narayan.
(Yes, teaching ethnography is kind of expensive - need to buy several books)
Let me now move on to the actual use of quotations and field notes’ material in a journal article.
Including extensive quotations or fragments of field notes in a manuscript is quite common in qualitative research. Much like in quantitative work you present tables, graphs, equations, etc., qualitative (textual, visual) material is presented as evidence in qualitative papers.
In the Hudson and Okhuysen 2009 paper, you can see that the authors draw full quotations from their field notes and interview data. Personally, I would reference the exact details of the interview (anonymized, of course, and coded)
This quotation from Ralph-Morrow's 2020 article shows integration of fieldnote material (a description of how a speaker recounted an anecdote and how did it end) with direct quotation (which in this case came from observing a demonstration, but could be drawn from interviews).
This quotation from Walsh-Dilley's 2020 GEC paper does the same (integrate observational material from fieldnote with interview material). Personally, I like this dialogic approach to presenting ethnographic fieldwork and interview material. It shows a fully embedded researcher
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I understand the reason why students (and faculty!) ask me how long does it take me to read and engage deeply with the materials I read. Generally speaking I'm a very, very, very fast reader. But when I really need to absorb the material in great depth, I am relatively slow.
My own students ask me "how long should it take me to prepare for your course?" -- I believe this question comes from the notion of credit-hours: to prepare for a 4 credits class, you should, in theory,
... devote one hour of preparation per class hour.
When I taught math (differential and integral calculus, multiple variables calculus and differential equations), I always told my students they had to study for 3 hours per hour of class. Not that I thought it was a great idea.
In a previous thread I indicated that in the same way that we need a repertoire of reading strategies, we also need to recognize the different types of articles, book chapters and books we read.
In this thread I’ll showcase several types.
1) this piece about shadowing of political elites is one of my favourites - it’s in @polanalysis (a rather quantitative journal), focuses on a qualitative method (shadowing) and is by one of my favourite political scientists (@jenniferbussell)
I started with the Abstract.
Reading the first page took me just a few minutes and I can gain a lot of insight already.
I marked sentences that I’d like to quote directly (definition of shadowing, how it works). These direct quotations can go in a Cornell Note, CSED row or Everything Notebook or index card
THREAD: Teaching students how to differentiate among various types of reading materials is important, not only for students but also for those of us who are educators.
For example, these papers are specific to “methods”: they describe a method (or a type of innovation to make a method work)
I always tell my students to avoid doing an AIC with methods papers. Instead do a meso-level or medium-level read: look for major themes, ideas, concepts.
These are “empirical” papers: authors apply or develop a new method which then is implemented in a case study, comparative examination or dataset.
Empirical papers, in my view, can be first quickly read using AIC and LATER, do a second round of in-depth reading.
THREAD: On a strategy to skim articles (for undergraduates).
Several fellow professors (@drheather_smith@EJMcCann among others) have told me that they find my Reading Strategies resource page slightly advanced for undergraduates. This might be the case (and may apply to ESL)
The above said, I DO have a page with Reading Strategies that is specific for Undergraduate Students (see here - raulpacheco.org/resources/reso…)
When I teach how to read (whether it is to my own undergrad and grad students, or to my research assistants), I always recommend (undergrad or grad) doing a quick skim, THEN a second round.
DISCLOSURE: I paid for this book stand with my hard earned and very devalued Mexican pesos. I bought it for $499 Mexican pesos (circa $23 USD) at Costco but I looked for it this weekend and I couldn’t find them anymore (I should have bought 3. Two for my home offices, one FLACSO.
A couple of features will be intuitive like this flexible adjustment contraption in the back. This book stand comes without any instructions and there is only one YouTube video and it doesn’t give much explanation.
The feature that was NOT intuitive at all and took me a while to move from locked to unlocked and back was the adjustable base that holds books and papers. That takes a while to tinker with but once you get it, locking and unlocking is easy peasy breeze.