Thread by @SwipeWright

1) 🚨BREAKING: Whistleblowers detail financial corruption and racist retaliation at troubled charter school. Teachers come forward with affidavits and docs supporting claims that students were scrutinized and interrogated based on their racial/gender/sexual/religious identities.

2) Plaintiff William Clark seeks to have his failing grade removed for the racist workshop so that he may graduate.

Claims that "defendants alter, inflate and misrepresent their grading, attendance, and curriculum as it suits them for various purposes."

3) CLAIM "But for Defendants’ intentional racial prejudice, William would not have received a failing grade for his 'Sociology of Change' class."

These subjective grading practices are supported testimonies from teachers and administrators, and business records.

4) Recap on racist teaching methods:

5) When Plaintiff WIlliam Clark objected to these lessons, he was given a failing grade and no alternative class to receive equal credit. To graduate he must subject himself to the same racially prejudiced teaching in the "Sociology of Change" workshop.

6) One "Sociology of Change" class "erupted into racially charged tumult" forcing the teacher to terminate discussion.

7) When Plaintiffs complained to the school Principal, they made it clear that the "Sociology of Change course is still a valuable learning experience for William (and his classmates) and will continue to be a required course for graduation."

8) Violating the Plaintiff's First Amendment rights, he now "requests injunctive relief ordering Defendants to expunge the grade they conferred upon him in retaliation... for resisting their coercive, invasive and discriminatory curricular assignments and classroom sessions."

9) "Plaintiff’s poor performance in the class was the result of the racial hostility and harassment baked into it, and this affected Plaintiff disparately on account of his generally perceived race and color."

Claims failing grade was an act of "retaliation" against Plaintiff.

10) Plaintiff is requesting his failing grade in the Sociology of Change class to be expunged, and for a temporary restraining order against Defendants.

11) Whistleblower testimonies to follow shortly.

12) AFFIDAVIT from a senior admin at the school reports witnessing "many potentially illegal, disingenuous, and harmful practices behind the scenes."

Believes that "intentional racial discrimination was a determinative factor in Defendants' disparate treatment" of the Plaintiff.

13) This person states that WIlliam Clark's mother's concern for his safety are "well founded."

14) They claim that the school's financial troubles led to a "hard restart" where "all classes and teaching loads were adjusted mid-year" and the "curriculum and coursework was suddenly and dramatically altered to meet financial needs."

15) The school fudged enrollment numbers, likely to secure more funding.

Whistleblower claims that the school's financial deficits "endanger student safety, and put students in unique situations like William [the Plaintiff] at greater risk."

16) Anti-police ideologies among those in leadership positions "jeopardized student safety" and "still do."

Police with guns and badges were required to be "contained at the front office room" and police cars were not allowed to park in front of the school.

17) Because of the "sensitive political and racial nature" of some of the staff's commitments, and their "idiosyncratic" and "retributive race ideology," many other staff, including the whistleblower "were hesitant to raise objections."

18) Despite the school running large financial deficits, some staff were investing in consultants who championed Critical Race Theory.

One such consultant was nevertheless rejected because their materials contained "too many white authors in its suggested reading."

19) Student activism surrounding their racial identities were encouraged, that is, unless the students were white.

20) Student grades are frequently altered when it suits the school. However, the whistleblower believes that it did not suit them to alter William Clark's grade, and that this is due to the Defendants' racial prejudice.

21) What follows is a series of slides selected from a PowerPoint presentation given at the school titled "Equity = Everything."

Goals are centered around "anti-racism" and "strategies to deconstruct and/or decenter white dominant culture at work."

22) Kids are taught to "honor multiple identities and intersectionality" but to "prioritize race."

23) Equity and white supremacist culture are a main focus.

What components of white supremacist culture resonates with you?

24) Some components of white supremacist culture:

- Worship of the written word
- Reason > Emotion
- Numbers over stories

This can be summarized as: Science = white supremacy

25) Claims that white supremacy exists essentially everywhere, from hiring decisions, preformance reviews, team culture, student culture, etc.

No hard examples or evidence given.