If someone tweeted "Go out and kill a *insert colour* person*, they could get arrested for incitement to violence and we agree with that because someone could get hurt.
Someone explain the moral difference between that and the Right-wing hacks telling people to ignore the rules?
I saw this from Toby Young and it just got me thinking...
If enough people listened to this, many people would die.
Or maybe a more direct instruction not to follow the rules, like here...
The deal Johnson signed in 2019 and won his election on was tied to a political declaration that said we'd have a Level Playing Field based on our geographic proximity.
So if you let them imply the EU's being unreasonable for not giving us a deal like Canada... 🤬 #Marr#Ridge
Here's @skynewsniall essentially repeating the tweet at the top of this thread.
I'm going to have to make a big video on that interview... in the 4 minutes before Marr starts.😅
Oh I'm very aware of that. I'm blocked by Julia Hartley-Brewer, Daniel Hannan, and John Redwood, and while it's a nice badge of honour...
It means they're able to spew misinformation without being challenged by me.
Here are the videos that got me blocked:
With Julia Hartley-Brewer, she blocked me for sharing this video.
So now she can spread intolerance without me bothering her. @JuliaHB1
Daniel Hannan blocked me for sharing this video. In fact we were supposed to debate each other with @krishgm, but he pulled out as soon as he heard it was me.
So now @DanielJhannan can keep lying about Brexit without me calling him out.
Hmmm...🤔
Brexiters now want a No-Deal which forces the EU to put tariffs on the UK, because they don't want a deal where if UK standards fall behind EU standards the EU would put tariffs on the UK?
You're snatching the gun out of the EU's hand and shooting yourself in the face.
Everyone gets how dumb this is, right?
The only substantial difference between what they're complaining about and what they're going for is that what they're going for has zero chance of even temporary free trade.