Interesting, that Navalnys quote the famous cult final saying from the most chauvinist and imperialist Russian movie “Brat 2”, the movie Putin absolutely loves to quote as well, as this movie calls to kill U.S. Americans and Ukrainians and proclaims Russians a superior nation.
The moment from the film:
And here is another moment, one Putin loves to quote. The protagonist robes the "morally spoiled" American business person who is involved in sex trafficking and porno production with minors from Russia (hallo, QAnon!) :
Putin quotes this dialogue amid his press conference:
Putin quotes it once again: "We are stronger than anyone. Because we are right. Russians are strong when they are right":
This movie and its chauvinistic attitude was effectively used as a propaganda tool for Putin's rise in 2000s. The slogan "Danila (the protagonist) is our brother (brat), Putin is our president" was used by Putin and supported by the actor Sergey Bodrov: kinoart.ru/texts/putin-na…
Here - a very moving scene. The protagonist's brother interrogates a Ukrainian, calls him "Banderite bastard" and finally kills with words: "you serpents will pay for Sevastopol!" (a Crimea's naval base):
In the movie, Ukrainian diaspora in Canada cooperates with U.S. American producers of porno films with Russian minors and tries to stop the protagonist from his vendetta.
And here is the full version of the movie with English subtiles. Amid Ukrainians and U.S. elites, other enemies of Russia portrayed in the movie: black Americans, Jews. The only one "friend" of Russia: an American redneck, "a normal guy like you and me".
I repeat: the movie had been produced in year 2000. It has forged, polished and made perfect all contemporary basics of Russian politics. And as Navalny demonstrates - is extremely important up to date! Those Western "experts" who used to ignore it, need to check their knowledge.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Starting from today, Ukrainian business are obliged to provide services in Ukrainian in a case when a customer requests to get a such one. Sounds very logical, huh? Still, there are a lot of myths and anti-Ukrainian propaganda around this law. Let me try to explain (THREAD)
2/x Indeed, most of Ukrainians understand at least two languages: Ukrainian and Russian. Many of Ukrainians speak the third language: Tatar, Bulgarian, Greek, Polish, Hungarian etc. But in almost ever case when the discussion turns to the topic of language, one mentions Russian
3/x The speed of Russian language has at least 300 years old history. It was a history of prohibition of Ukrainian language (with short interruptions) and forced russification of Ukraine. Therefore, when one says, "Ukraine has always been bilingual", it is just not true.
(1/x) Good news about local elections in Ukraine: 1) Elections were free and democratic; 2) Democr. pro-European parties "Eur.Solidarity", "Holos" and "Syla Lyudei" are strong in many regions; 3) Syla Lyudei is a great example of a grassroot democratic party, free from oligarchs
(2/x) 4) Several important cities have secured strong pro-European pro-reform governance: first of all Lviv and Vinnytsya; 5) In Kyiv, Klychko will be re-elected. He is (as for me) a bad mayor (infrastructure, urbanist policy), but he is clearly not a pro-Russian guy or a radical
(3/x) 6) New "project parties" founded by oligarchs have suffered a total defeat. "Za Maibutne" by Kolomoisky has failed everywhere. This is a great sign; 7) The slogan "I am from the president's party, I have support of the president, therefore vote for me" does not work at all;
THREAD 1/x It is a very dangerous situation in Ukraine. 12 days before local elections President Zelensky publishes his video statement and says he pursues "a real democracy", so he will "ask people 5 simple questions" amid local elections. The questions will be announced later.
2/x Zelensky calls this initiative "a poll", not "a referendum" - obviously because there is no law on referendum in Ukraine in edition which Zelensky would be happy to see. This draft law did not pass the parliament. "A poll" also can to be organized just a few days in advance.
3/x Announcing "a poll" also allows Zelensky to interpret answers in any way he needs. "A poll" does not underly the laws and does not need to be controlled by the Election Commission.
THREAD 1/x Zelensky's party "Servant of the People" will "for sure unite" with the Medvedchuk's pro-Russian party OPZZh "after the local elections", says Zelensky's top politician, a parliament deputy Kachura, who is a deputy head of UA mission to PACE. He sees no problem in this
2/x Kachura says, a union with Putin's relative and an ex-KGB lawyer Medvedchuk is "inevitable", and is already under consideration of the party's leadership. For him, it would be ok. At the same time, he says he would leave Zelensky's party, if it would unite with Poroshenko (!)
3/x A de-facto coalition of Zelensky's party and Medvedchuk's one already exists in the national parliament. It was Medvedchuk's party which voted for the most important Zelensky's law proposals in order to guarantee expansion of Zelensky's power (like the general attorney case).
Ukrainians in Russian empire and in the Soviet Union were blacks in the racist America. They were claimed to be "dirty", "stupid", their language was mocked, their national cloth and accent was used as a "funny" thing in comedies (aka "blackface"). Their carrier had clear limits.
In the Soviet army, Ukrainian recruits were forbidden to talk Ukrainian to each other - even on the territory of Ukraine. A military carrier was mostly limited up to warrant-officer. Ukr. were "praised" to be "good household holder", that is why so many Ukr. served at warehouses.
If you want to imagine a portrait of a "good" Ukrainian in Soviet propaganda, think of Mammy from the "Gone with the wind" - a loyal servant, very ground-stable and knowing his/her place. A "bad Ukrainian" instead was pictured as rebellious, dreaming of independency (unheard!)
I have another steps to end a "conflict in and around Ukraine": 1) Russia takes its troops and mercenaries from Donbas; 2) Russia gives Crimea back to Ukraine; 3) Russia takes its citizens it has illegally resettled to Crimea since 2014;
(continued)
4) Russia pays Ukraine compensation for all damages done to Ukrainian infrastructure; 5) Russia pays Ukraine compensation for de-mining activities; 6) Russia pays compensation to Ukrainian victims of Russian aggression or to their heirs;
(continued)
7) Russia delivers to international court its political and military personnel responsible for its war against Ukraine; 8) Russia clearly cancels all sabotage programs of destabilizing Ukraine; 9) Russia returns to Ukraine all factories it has moved to Russia in 2014