Hindu rulers of the past knew how to punish lowly mlecchas when they overstepped the line & insulted our faith.There was in instance where Aliya Ramaraya of Vijayanagara, who was actually very tolerant of turushkas,actually punished them in a fitting way for insulting our deities
Aliya Ramaraya recruited a large number of turushkas into the Vijayanagara army. There was an occasion where 2 such turushka officials came to the capital in order to receive payments for the services which was due to them.
During that time the turushkas were seated in the durbar & a wild boar passed them at a distance outside. At the sight of the boar the two turushkas spat on the ground. The boar as we know is not only avatara but was also part of the royal insignia of the Vijayanagara empire.
The courtiers brought this incident immediately to the notice of Ramaraya,who decided to make the turushkas pay for their action. He made the turushkas wait for months on the outskirts of Vijayanagara before eventually paying their salaries. And how did he do that? See next tweet
With the quantity of gold due to the turushkas, Ramaraya had a golden shaped boar made & sent it to the waiting turushkas who felt mightily insulted left Vijayanagara empty handed & went back crying to the territory of the deccan sultanate.
Tit for tat by Aliya Ramaraya.
Aliya Ramaraya gets a lot of criticism for making a few strategic blunders during his reign & especially during the war at Talikota. But it has to be said that he was a very devout Hindu & a very shrewd ruler in many ways.
Had Ramaraya's plan worked at Talikota, Vijayanagara would have expanded by twice its existing territory with defeat of deccan sultanate. It would have brought them in direct contact with the mughals in 1565 itself. Strategic blunders coupled with ill luck saw that go up in smoke
Surya Temples mentioned in the map are no ordinary teerthas. They find mention in the Skandapuranam.The sthalapurana of each one of these temples is explained in detail by Skanda to Agastya muni. Its worth having a look at the puranic description of each of these teerthas
Lolarka is considered to be the foremost among of Surya teerthas at Kashi. It came to be known by that name since Surya was very eager to see Kashi when he came down to test the then ruler of Kashi, Divodasa. Its exact location is given in the below shloka (2)
As the above Shloka mentions,Lolarka was established in the southern direction of Kashi at the confluence of Asi river & Ganga. Skanda also mentions a number of benefits to be had by having a Darshana of Lolarka. A darshana of Lolarka on Rathasaptami removes all paapa. (3)
Bhandaru Lakshminarayana, a musicologist during the reign of Shri Krishnadevaraya records in his work, the Sangitasuryodaya on how the great Hindu king crossed the Krishna river & burnt down the whole of the यवनजनपदं (muhammadan kingdom) & captured the 3 sons of the sultan.
The Sangitasuryodaya is one among the 9 important musicological treatises written during the Vijayanagara era. The others are Sangitasara by Vidhyaranya, Taladipika by Tippendra, Sangitakalanidi by Kallinatha, Bhandaru Vittaleshwara's commentary on Sarangadeva's Sangeetaratnakara
Bhandaru Lakshminarayana's Sangitasuryodaya, Achyutadevaraya's Talakalavriddhi, Ramamatya's Swaramelakalanidhi. Carnatic music owes a lot to all the above works. Among all the works,the Sangeetaratnakara deserves a special mention? Why? Because it was almost lost due to invasions
Historian MH Rama Sharma's account of the plunder of Hampi.
"The arrival of the mussalman army on the 6th day(after Talikota war)
sealed the fate of Vijayanagar and its citizens. The gathering
gloom soon burst upon them in a storm by opening the flood
gates of hate and lust.(2)
No quarter was given and no pity shown.
Neither age nor position nor sex was excepted. Day after day
the slaughter of civilians went on unchecked till blood ran into
rivers. Then the victors turned to despoil the palaces and dese-
crate the pagodas(Temples) (3)
A THREAD detailing the daily routine of Hindu emperors of the past during peace time. Once we are done through with the thread, one will realize what a contrast the present day secular state is to the Hindu Samrajyas of the past. As to how far we've moved away from tradition (1)
As an example we'll have a look at the life of Vijayanagara samrat Vira Narasimharaya. He was the elder brother of the great Shri Krishnadevaraya. Each aspect of Narasimharaya's life has been chronicled in detail in the Raayavacakam (2)
The day of Narasimharaya started with him waking up during the auspicious Brahma muhurta time (between 4:30 am to 6 am). First thing in the morning he'd listen to reading of books both on Dharma & statecraft. He'd then proceed to look at his own reflection in the mirror (3)
For the assertive Hindu one thing must be very clear.That Hindu samaj can be destroyed only from within, by "Hindus" themselves.The fastest way to destroy us is by undermining the things that we cherish the most.Our traditions,Temples & festivals. Including veneration for the Cow
Hindus didn't face this kind of a predicament even during the medieval period when some of the worst atrocities were commited. Those were commited by external aggressors.More often than not,Hindus responded fittingly to Temple desecration & Gohatya by paying back in the same coin
There are umpteen examples of Hindu kings of the medieval age punishing Temple breaking cow eating mlecchas. From Rana Kumbha of Mewar to Devaraya I of Vijayanagara to the Marathas. They didn't have to deal with beef eating HINO types.
Guru Sitaram Goel explains away the mindset & psyche of the "beef eating Hindu" types in his own unique & distinctive style in his book "Hindu Society Under Siege". No one puts it across with such piercing clarity as guru SRG does. I'll just quote him in the next few tweets (1)
"The Hindu who is addicted to Macaulayism lives in a world of his own which has hardly any contact with the traditional Hindu society. He looks forward to the day when India will become a society like societies in the West where the rate of growth, the gross national product..(2)
...and the standard of living are the only criteria of progress. He is tolerant towards religion to the extent that it remains a matter of private indulgence and does not interfere with the smooth unfoldment of the socio-political scene... (3)