A new report by Unit Director Meg Russell and @danielgover argues that the House of Commons should govern its own time – and makes proposals for wresting back that control from the government. @UKandEU
There have been numerous recent controversies over control of the Commons’ time
Think of Brexit headlines about MPs ‘seizing the agenda’, or clashes over procedure during the pandemic. At the heart of both lie questions about who decides what the Commons discusses & when⏱️
2/8
At present, the government has significant agenda control 💪. And it has monopoly control over prorogation & recall, which determine whether the Commons can sit at all.
Our new report explores this system, its problems, and what can be done.
Key conclusions include:
3/8
🔷The government has too much control. The resulting clashes over the Commons’ time have fed hostility at Westminster & anti-parliamentary rhetoric externally.
🔷The Commons should control its own agenda. This could be done through a weekly amendable business motion.
4/8
🔷To protect minority rights, opposition & backbench time should be reformed to provide a minimum fortnightly/monthly allocation, rather than a sessional one.
5/8
🔷The Commons also needs more power over its sitting dates – otherwise ministers could e.g. use prorogation to stop unwanted Commons debate
🔷Prorogation should need Commons approval. And the Commons should have a ⬆️ role in setting recess dates – & be able to recall itself
6/8
🔷 Some of these changes could be quickly & easily implemented. Others engage fundamental principles, and a formal review would be appropriate.
@CommonsProcCom could do this, or a new ad hoc body, perhaps under the Speaker's auspices.
7/8
Find a fuller summary of the report in the authors’ blog, linked below.
Or, alternatively, follow this link to go direct to the full report (72pp pdf): ucl.ac.uk/constitution-u…
@DanielGover & @james_lisak review the development of the hybrid Commons during 2020 - arguing that remote voting must now be restored, & that these events reveal the problems of government control over the Commons agenda
Last spring, the Commons adapted quickly to the challenges of the pandemic. Hybrid arrangements for select committees & Commons debates, & online remote voting, were all in place by mid-May - a major achievement by Commons staff.
2/8
But in May the government simply allowed those arrangements to lapse, despite anger from opposition & backbench MPs.
It would take until 30/12 - when the government wanted MPs to debate its Brexit deal legislation - for full virtual participation in debates to be restored.
3/8
Statement from Unit Director Professor Meg Russell on the 16 new appointments to the House of Lords announced today.
"It is hard not to see the Prime Minister’s latest round of peerage appointments as anything less than outrageous"
1 of 3
It's 3 days before (what's left of) Christmas, so there will be no full analysis now.
But to see the effects of today's peerage announcements just add 16 (7 Con, 5 Lab, 4 Crossbench) to the details below. The rest of the analysis still stands.
Following 14 months of research, deliberation, interviews and consultation, the Working Group on Unification Referendums on the Island of Ireland launches its interim report.
To launch the Working Group on Unification Referendums on the Island of Ireland’s interim report the Group is convening a series of webinars.
The webinars are an opportunity for discussion of the report’s purposes, analysis, and conclusions
Details👇
2/
The Unit is hosting one of the webinars
3 December @ 1pm
Chair of the group @alanjrenwick will be joined on the panel with Working Group member Alan Whysall, former senior civil servant Clare Salters & @martinkettle
This looks bad. Government using its control of the Commons agenda to manipulate debate on whether MPs can participate virtually in proceedings during the pandemic.
Which is surely, if anything is, a matter that MPs themselves should be able properly and fairly to decide.
Oddly, this fails to mention Conservative @CommonsProcCom chair Karen Bradley, & the Conservative co-sponsor of @RhonddaBryant's amendment, & that they all supported that amendment in order to open up virtual participation to a larger number of excluded MPs but JRM blocked it.