Just look at the cost of governance participation for the protocols discussed in the previous series.
Do token holders really have any incentive to participate if they are spending $10+ on voting, which they may not be interested in at all?
I don’t think so
3/7
Earlier, it was already mentioned that Compound governance framework provides an opportunity to perform gasless voting using EIP-712.
However, the infrastructure using these signatures for governance is just beginning to evolve.
4/7
Snapshot is a good half-measure, but it does not guarantee the correct voting result on-chain.
One solution could be Optimistic Snapshot from Aragon, but it will most likely be costly in gas fees.
5/7
For 349 projects on Snapshot at the time of data collection, about 15 proposals are created per day.
It’s not surprising that most of the proposals are created by community members, not by the core team.
6/7
The top 15 projects with a median number of voters for Core proposals have familiar names: yearn, Aave, PoolTogether, BadgerDAO.
Each of them has 100+ voters, and it is unlikely that their own on-chain governance would have achieved this participation level after launch.
7/7
Regardless of gas prices, gasless voting solutions will evolve.
And since someone will still have to pay for voting, it seems fair to use a tiny fraction of the cash flow so that the fees don’t lie on the token holders’ shoulders.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s go back to Curve’s SynthSwap and use a real example to calculate the benefits of using it for large trades.
Due to the way Synthetix works, trades using Virtual Synths are divided into two transactions. Consequently, people using SynthSwap carry certain price risks.
2/5
The first transaction: 1) 9M USDT swapped to 8.95M sUSD through Curve sUSD v2 pool (0.5% negative slippage) 2) 8.95M sUSD swapped to 6.69k sETH through Synthetix Exchange (0.3% fee)
3/5
The second transaction took place 37 minutes after the first: 3) 6.69k sETH swapped to 6.71k ETH through Curve sETH pool (0.3% positive slippage)
So in this trade, ETH price was $1,341. For comparison, CoinGecko gives us $1,330.6 as ETH price, but what about the slippage?
Shortly, Curve will start supporting a new @synthetix_io feature - ‘Virtual Synths.’ Presumably, this will open the door to infinite liquidity for large trades.
Along with this, Synthetix Exchange had record trading volumes a few days ago.
But is everything so good?
2/6
A week and a half ago, @lawmaster noticed that all these volumes belong to a few specific addresses.
For some reason, these addresses were using the new ‘Multi-Collateral Loans’ feature, although they were not receiving any visible profits.
1/6 Currently, 49% of addresses eligible to claim $1INCH tokens have done so.
They took 75% of what was originally available on a $1INCH distributor smart contract. This is primarily because many big claimers are liquidity providers, and they needed to create markets.
2/6 The chart shows the distribution of the first actions which were taken by the wallet owners with all their 1INCH tokens.
Only 19% are holding tokens or stake them in the @1inchExchange ecosystem.
Almost 25% of wallets sold all their tokens at once after a claim.
3/6 29% transferred all their tokens to another address. This is because these are mainly additional user wallets.
The “Others” includes wallets that performed actions with parts of the claimed tokens, such as sending tokens to several addresses or selling them in parts.