Bar & Bench Profile picture
21 Jan, 103 tweets, 52 min read
#Breaking: Injunction suit filed in the Delhi High Court against the release of the film The White Tiger tonight at 12 on OTT platform.

Matter being hearing now by Justice C Hari Shankar
What is the cause for coming at this time?: Court

Claim is purely monetary claim. Why should I give an injunction today?: Court

The fact that this movie is being released has been in the public domain for more than a month… you are aware…: Court

#WhiteTiger
Adv Kapil Sankhla for petitioner John Hart Jr says he is resident in America. He adds that understanding was that it would be released in theatres. There was no way this would release OTT

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court says it is of no use to say that petitioner has made other prolific movies. Petitioner should show why injunction should be given last minute, Court says.

Unless you can make a cast-iron case ... : Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Staying in US in no ground. It is a world wide web. Simple google search you would know movie is being released... you cannot surprise... last minute....: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sankhla says there were certain due diligences made in America before Hollywood movies are made. These diligences were not made in this case, he says.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
According to you, when did you get to know?... Give me the date. You cannot ask for an injunction on vague assertions: Court

We sent them a legal notice in October 2019 when we got to know Netflix is making this movie: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
A cease and desist letter was sent in 2019 and you chose to file a plaint to stop the release of the movie with 24 hours. Next: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sankhla says that there was an impression that the movie is not being shot in between Corona period.

Who gave you that impression? What material has been placed on record to say you got that impression?: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
In Hollywood, any studio does a due diligence before movie is shot. If diligence is done, they would have seen copyright is with me and contacted me: Adv Sankhla

Where have you shown that the (due diligence) process exists? Court asks

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
I am assuming arguendo you have copyright: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
I had secured rights from author back in 2008-2009: Adv Sankhla says

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
My right is unchallenged since that day. I am a man of some standing in Hollywood. I would be under bonafide belief that process that was followed throughout would be followed in this case:Adv Sankhla

I did not know some person sitting in India would flout this process, he adds
Your list of dates doesn't seem to indicate that the defendants are simply someone sitting in India. So don't tell me "somebody sitting in India" has suddenly violated your copyright and taken a movie: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Did not know that instead of a movie in Hollywood under laws governing it, the right would be infringed by the defendant, says Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Can you show something to show that led you to believe this movie would be in Hollywood?: Court

The producer is of Hollywood: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Sonia Mudbhatkal is in Hollywood... she is the first Tony-nominated producer of Hollywood. She contacted plaintiff no.1 (Hart) to make the movie. ... I purchased ten days after slumdog millionaire (movie came out): Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court ponders on full form of OTT platform.

Adv Sankhla mentions that it may be "Over The Top"

Over the top would have million meanings Mr Sankhla (laughs): Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court asks if advanced notice was served to other side. Adv Sandeep Sethi is appearing for @netflix, Court is informed

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
2011 there are differences between the plaintiff (Hart) and his partner. Therefore, there is a substantial delay in launching the movie, Adv Sankhla says

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sankhla informs that there was a literary agreement.

Literary agreement between you and the author?:Court

Yes, me and Mr Aravind Adiga: Adv Sankhla

This gives you absolute right to do what?: Court

To make movie adaptation out of this, milord: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
My right of adaptation of movie is absolute. This is an OTT release on Netflix. For them, it is a commercial venture but not for me. I can never make the grand movie I had envisaged. This dream of mine can never be compensated in terms of money milord: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
This was the highest-selling book after "Life of Pi". Slumdog Millionaire made 8 Oscars. This book is more complicated, has more layers than "Q&A".

It (White Tiger) was meant to be made on a grand scale.

-- Adv Sankhla says

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
You may have grand dreams. Merely saying my dreams will be shattered is no ground to say there should be an injunction on the release of the film. We are coming back to square one: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Good luck to you, but since Oct 2019 at least you were well aware that @netflix was contemplating making a movie: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
You have sent a legal cease and desist in 2019. You have come to the court less than 24 hours before the movie's release: That is more than enough to say injunction cannot be granted in view of existing legal position: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
However watertight your case may be, a person who approaches court in last minute has to make out... stopping a release of a movie has serious ramifications on producers, director, channel... you are not the only one whose finances are in consideration: Court
I am not trying the suit. I do not know what the ultimate outcome of the suit will be: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
For you, it is more a question of dreams being shattered. (but an injunction) is going to have serious financial repercussions on the makers. They also may have dreams that the movie may launch them, that it will become a hit: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Prima facie case, irreparable loss, balance of convenience - these considerations become relevant the last minute: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
This is my swan song. That entitles me to the protection of this Court... with the history... kind of awards I have received, I deserve the mercy of the court. The financial ramifications are limited (for the other side): Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Except for the fact that I have come belatedly to the court, I have passed the other tests: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
This (release of White Tiger on @netflix) would be the height of piracy. I have purchased rights on the international forum... in India itself, these rights are being taken away: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
If it were theatre release, there would have been checks and balances, which have been given go by since it is an OTT release, Adv Sankhla argues.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Heavens won't fall for Netflix (if the injunction is granted today). This is just another movie for them to release... for me my right would go away: Adv Sankhla

@netflix

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sandeep Sethi is now making submissions for Netflix.

@netflix

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sethi: They chose to approach the Court one day before the release of the film.

@netflix

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sethi: None of these notices referred to in the plaint have been filed. There is an attempt to conceal facts...

@netflix

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
According to you, who is the rightful owner? Court

By assignment, plaintiff's company called Particle Media Pvt limited: Sethi

So you got the rights from Particle? Court asks

You said "plaintiff's company": Court

Sorry, I meant "defendant's company".: Adv Sethi

#WhiteTiger
Adv Sethi says that plaintiff 2 waived all claims against Particle Media after settlement. Court records the submission.

Adv Sethi: This agreement is also not disclosed, and certainly no copy filed.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
The plaint filed lacks disclosure and also involves concealment: Adv Sethi

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sethi: .... even the plaint is not signed by the plaintiffs... so there is no proper plaint before your Lordships to agitate a claim.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sethi: The power of attorney filed of the first plaintiff on page 560... the last line of first para is 9 Dec 2020. And your Lordship is approached on January 21 for an injunction today.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Hearing briefly witnesses electronic clock voicing that "It's eight o clock"

I know its eight o clock, but there are things remaining, Justice Hari Shankar remarks orally, in a lighter vein

#CourtroomExchange

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sidharth Chopra, for various defendants, says his is largely adopting arguments made by Adv Sandeep Sethi.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
This case is a textbook example for why no ad-interim relief should be given, as was in the case in the "Lootcase case" where Court deprecated the practice of coming to court last-minute, Adv Chopra submits.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Way back in 2013-14, there was a similar claim made by plaintiff and plaintiff had waived all claims on a settlement: Adv Chopra

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
I am not some brazen violator of copyright. We too undergo diligence. We are a responsible company. : Adv Chopra

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
We have proceeded to make this film not in a vacuum but with Lava Media (Defendant 7), which is a subsidiary of a company which is Defendant 1: Adv Chopra

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
This is at best a monetary dispute, and non-existent dispute, going by submissions by Sethi: Adv Chopra

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
We are told OTT can be delayed by days. We have a calendar of releases lined up. To trivialise an OTT release is really an irresponsible submission. What is amazing is on perusal of para 22 .. has enough material to deny this entity an interim injunction: Adv Chopra

#WhiteTiger
Promotions for film commences in October. The film has already been released in US theatres on 11 Jan 2021: Adv Chopra

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sankhla is making submissions for Plaintiffs

Referring to the defendant's arguments that Particle Media (the company defendants are claiming has right in the book) is owned by the defendant 1 (Mukul Deora) "My instructions are that this incorrect", says Sankhla
Raj Lakhani, who is not a party here, owns Particle Media. There have been various shell companies created. It is to confuse the issue as regards ownership of book rights, Adv Sankhla submits.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sankhla responds to submissions tht Plaintiff 2, Sonia Mudbhatkal had waived rights in the book following settlement in 2013-14

Plaintiff 2 has no rights in the book. As pointed out from the agreement, the right is assigned to plaintiff 1 (Hart) and not plaintiff 2: Sankhla
How do we know P1 hasn't assigned it (adaptation rights) to P2?: Court

Then that agreement would be stated by them. there is no such agreement: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Are you denying... that there was an agreement between Particle and plaintiff relating to the book's rights?: Court

I am taking instructions right now: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
No one has challenged the agreement between Plantiff 1 and author. Particle is not owned by Defendant 1: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Sankhla makes submissions on why there was some delay in approaching the Court.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Law is very clear, but when it is a fact when the right (to the book) has been purchased by P1 at a substantial sum of money from the author and when P1 is in the process of making a grand move, heavens will not fall if OTT release is delayed by few days: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
Adv Sankhla says there would be a travesty of justice if relief is not granted.

Where would the law protect a person who has international rights in a book? Where has Particle got any right?: Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
As soon as Plaintiff 1 came to know, he came to court: Adv Sankhla

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
First of all, let us get one thing on the table. The suit was jointly filed by plaintiffs 1 and 2... you are appearing for both. You cannot say "P2 gave some agreement, P1 has the copyright, whatever P2 had with Particle is of no concern": Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
I am not going to separate P1 and P2: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Adv Sankhla reads excerpts of certain agreements

These paragraphs that you have read indicate there is a veritable network of agreements... you had not chosen to place any of these on record, except to make an averment in the plaint: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
If you think I am going to give you relief without placing any of these on record, you are badly mistaken. Why should I not take... that this is not an open and shut case of blackmail?: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Don't blame corona for everything. You are aware from 2019..for a half baked story, you want the court to give you an interim injunction? I am not convinced. There is absolutely nothing: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Milords may just give me one minute: Adv Sankhla

Your conduct is inviting severe costs now. This is the limit. I never realised... If it was a writ petition, I would have thrown out right away. Since it is a suit...: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Your client needs to be thrown out on the ground of suppression: Court

This is just an attempt to browbeat the defendants. ... I am not in the least satisfied with bona fides of the client, Justice Hari Shankar adds.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
It would have been another case if the plaintiff was not a reputed producer, Adv Sankhla says

It makes no difference to me. don't keep telling me your client is the ultimate producer made 20 films and won Oscars: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Sankhla urges Court for 24 hours to get the documents.

I (Hart) am in America: Adv Sankhla

You remain there: Court

Protect me for 24 hours: Sankhla

I will not protect you for 24 minutes, forget about hours: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Justice Hari Shankar is now dictating orders. Court records submissions made by Adv Sankhla for the plaintiffs.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court records plaintiff's submissions that there was a literary auction agreement with Plaintiff 1, that "The White Tiger" was to be an Oscar-worthy production, submissions on the various creditable achievements of Plaintiff 1 etc.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court records submission that Plaintiff 1 (Hart) had allowed Plaintiff 2 (Sonia Mudbhatkal) to work on the movie, but that no rights devolved on defendants.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court records plaintiff's submission that Plaintiff 1 came to know of @netflix making the film only in October 2019 and that a legal notice was issued, and that there was no impression that film shooting was taking place amid COVID pandemic.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court records plaintiff submission that in Hollywood, a copyright holder has no reason to apprehend a copyright infringement & that any studio seeking to make a film based on Aravind Adiga's novel would have contacted P1 as "rightful copyright holder" in the interest of diligence
Court records Adv Sankhla's submissions (for plaintiffs) that defendants made several misrepresentations to which plaintiff 1 succumbed.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court records submission by the plaintiff that allowing Netflix release of the film tonight would lead to irreparable injury to the plaintiff, both financial and emotional, his dreams being shattered and his desire to make and release a magnum opus.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court records submissions made by Sankhla that the defendants are committing heights of piracy which would result in complete evisceration in plaintiff's right, emanating from the literary auction agreement of 2009.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court record's Sankhla submission that delay in approaching court was unavoidable and that defendants had "led plaintiff down the garden path" on the aspect of film shooting.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court notes Sethi's submission for defendants that cause of action, as per plaint, went as far back as October 2019 and that Sankhla has only drawn the attention of Court to one side of the story.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court refers to the communication dated 11 Oct 2019 by defendants denying plaintiff's claims to the film rights, records Sethi's submission also on the aspect of there being an agreement between Plaintiff and Particle Media (defendant's co.)

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court records submissions by Sethi there was a settlement agreement in 2014 where Rs 53 lakhs was paid consequent to which Plaintiff 2 waived all rights against Particle Media qua the "White Tiger" & present project. Court records submission that this was suppressed by plaintiffs
Court records submission by Sethi that therefore there is no reason why the suit is filed less than 24 hours before the release of #WhiteTiger (on Netlfix).

#DelhiHighCourt
Court records submissions by defendants that distinction drawn by Sankhla between theatre and OTT platforms is divorced from reality and that OTT releases also involve huge finances and goodwill which cannot be compromised.

@netflix

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court records Sankhla's rejoinder submissions after defendant's submissions.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court's Order: 1. The plaintiffs were aware of the possibility of the subject film being released on Netflix at least as far back as Oct 2019....

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court: There is no material on record to justify the plaintiff's approaching this court less than 24 hours prior to release seeking stay

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Court: It is no answer to the delay that owing to COVID that plaintiffs were under impression that no shooting would take place or that film would not be released.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Nor can it be their stand, in wake of the legal notice. that plaintiffs expected due diligence on the part of any person making the film on "White Tiger" and to be informed in advance prior thereto - Court says.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
It is settled that any party approaching court at the end hour, seeking interlocutory indirection against the release of cinematographic film, is disentitled to any such relief- Court says.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
2. Paras 38-34 of plaint... clearly indicate prima facie that defendant 1 was not stranger while progressing film "White Tiger". There is reference to agreements between Defendant 1 and the company of Plaintiff 2. None of these documents is on record - Court

#WhiteTiger
... there is more to the case than meets the eye. Without having the aforesaid documents and chance to peruse.. this cannot court cannot come at prima facie finding that defendants have infringed the copyright of plaintiffs.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
It is not possible on the material of record to come to conclusion by producing or releasing the film, that defendants have indulged in illegal copyright infringement - Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
3. Court says there are considerable financial ramifications on both sides. The release of a film is merely the culmination of protracted exercise including production, promotion, publicity.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
I am prima facie, inclined to agree with Sethi that if the release of the film is stayed, it would result in irreparable consequences for the defendants: Court adds.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Plaintiff 1 is admittedly not the original creator of "White Tiger", he has been assigned the right to film the said literary work under a literary auction agreement dated March 4, 2009... : Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
#Breaking: #DelhiHighCourt declines to stay release of #WhiteTiger slated for @netflix release at midnight.

Court, however, asks defendants to keep detailed accounts of earnings from the film, in case the plaintiffs later succeed in their suit against the defendant-filmmakers.
Even if the film is released and plaintiffs ultimately succeed in the suit, it would be possible to recompensate them monetarily even for emotional trauma, which, acc to Sankhla, Plaintiff 1 would undergo as a result of his not being able to be the first to film #WhiteTiger:Court
On a holistic consideration of the facts, especially as plaintiffs have chosen to move court less than 24 hours of the release of the subject film, plaintiffs have not been able to make out a case for grant of ad-interim injunction staying release of the film: Court

#WhiteTiger
Having said that, defendants, even while permitted to release the film as scheduled are directed to keep detailed accounts of earnings made from film so that at a later stage, if the plaintiff succeeds, Court can consider monetary compensation: Court

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
Hearing is over.

#WhiteTiger
#DelhiHighCourt
[BREAKING] Delhi High Court refuses to stay release of The White Tiger on Netflix

Read FULL STORY on the late evening hearing that happened in Delhi High Court

@priyankachopra @RajkummarRao @NetflixIndia

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

23 Jan
[Book Launch] Supreme Court Judges to release book on "The Law of Emergency Powers" by Dr AM Singhvi and Prof Khagesh Gautam   

@DrAMSinghvi #SupremeCourt
Event begins.

Dr. C Raj Kumar, Founding Vice Chancellor of OP Jindal Global University gives introductory remarks.

@JindalGLS @DrAMSinghvi
Justice NV Ramana is the Chief Guest for the event; Justices Surya Kant, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and DY Chandrachud are guests of honour.

@DrAMSinghvi
Read 48 tweets
23 Jan
Hearing in MJ Akbar's criminal defamation case against Priya Ramani begins before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Ravindra K Pandey.

Case is at the stage of rebuttal by Akbar. Ramani has concluded her defense.

#MeToo #PriyaRamani #MJAkbar #Metooindia

@mjakbar Image
Senior Advocate Geeta Luthra appears for @mjakbar.

Senior Advocate Luthra reads a judgment on journalists having no special privileges.

Press council says you have to ve responsible. There are judgements that say you cannot have a parallel trial: Luthra.
Here is there is just a trial ..by a person on social media. It is unacceptable in a country ruled by rule of law : Luthra
Read 78 tweets
22 Jan
After getting discharged from the JJ Hospital, Mumbai today, ex-CEO of BARC @parthodasgupta’s lawyers moved the #BombayHighCourt seeking urgent transfer to a private hospital on the grounds that he was still unfit to be discharged. Image
Justice PD Naik who heard the plea in his chambers after court working hours refused to intervene and grant any interim relief.

@parthodasgupta was arrested by the @MumbaiPolice for his alleged involvement in the #TRPSCAM case.
Chief PP Deepak Thakare submitted to the Court that @parthodasgupta was being discharged because he was fit and would be examined by the prison officials before taking him in.

The court has directed the State to submit the medical report on Monday.
Read 6 tweets
22 Jan
Delhi High Court is hearing Rajiv Luthra's appeal challenging order staying the termination of Mohit Saraf from L&L partnership.

#RajivLuthra #MohitSaraf Image
Yesterday, a Division Bench of Justices Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Sanjeev Narula had asked the parties to come up with interim arrangement for functioning of the firm and for the benefits of its clients.

#RajivLuthra #MohitSaraf
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi for Rajiv Luthra argues that the status quo maintained.

Mohit Saraf can continue to practice without the Luthra name. He can take one or two persons with him : @DrAMSinghvi
Read 36 tweets
22 Jan
#MadrasHighCourt requests Advocate General to look into suggestions that may be made by Party-in-Person and temple activist Rangarajan Narasimhan on how the functioning of the HR&CE Department can be improved for the welfare of temples in Tamil Nadu.

@OurTemples
While making submissions in a PIL moved against State's decision to use temple land in Kallakurichi for the construction of a collectorate building, Narasimhan had raised a larger grievance that the HR&CE Department is not taking care of temples in Tamil Nadu.

#MadrasHighCourt
Responding to submissions that the State's construction activities would end up lands becoming "concrete jungles", #MadrasHighCourt CJ Sanjib Banerjee orally observes,

"The way we're procreating, we will leave very little green land in 50 years’ time."

#CourtroomExchange
Read 5 tweets
22 Jan
Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench of the #SupremeCourt to shortly hear plea filed by former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt to suspend his sentence in a custodial death case of 1990.
#custodialdeath Image
The incident pertained to the time when Sanjiv Bhatt was the Assistant Superintendent of Police, Jamnagar. Bhatt had taken over 100 persons into his custody for an incident of rioting in the area
#SupremeCourt
Lawyer seeks an adjournment as instructing counsel is not present

Senior Adv Mahender Singh: Last time it was Senior not there and today this. This pendency is being used in trial court
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!