...being upfront about Wilson's racism and how that influenced his thinking about intervening in World War I and forming the League of Nations: in short, he viewed himself and the US as the savior of "White Civilization"
Speaking of "White Civilization", I brought in Clash of Civilizations. This seemed especially important since Trump administration officials kept referencing it when discussing US-China relations.
I thought it was critical for students to understand what we mean by "International Order". Indeed, "order" became THE central concept of the first part of the course.
This required spending a lot of time wading through the definitions...
Previously, HST got a reference in the class, but now it's the focus of my discussion on the international politics of trade and finance (which is nice, since I can fall back on my @LSEIRDept training!)
(2) The `isms': what better way to think about the changes in the tone of US foreign policy than to view it through a "realist" or "liberal internationalist" lens. That is why this assignment is valuable
(1) I spend A LOT LESS time discussing the "awesomeness" of democracies: in war; promoting peace; promoting cooperation; promoting trade. To be frank, this is because the Trump years have laid bare how we really don't have a good grasp on the concept
...a key lesson I took from the Trump administration is how much stability there is in the general direction and behavior of states toward one another despite leader personalities and relationships with other leaders.
In many ways, Trump was the exception that proved the rule: that's not to say there are NO differences, but continuity in US Foreign Policy is evident
Indeed, I'll stick to much of what I said in this @UChicagoCIR debate about "replacement level Republican" and Trump
In sum, the Trump years altered my IR course by:
-- More race, order, & system structure
-- Reinforce $, isms, & US not "shining city on a hill"
-- Less "democracy is awesome" & leader relationships/personalities
[END]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the final hours of Trump's Presidency, it's worth asking: what just happened?
With respect to foreign policy, Trump told us exactly what was going to happen...back in 1987. That's when he placed a full page open letter in @nytimes@washingtonpost & @BostonGlobe
[THREAD]
He then followed up that letter with an interview on @Oprah
King had become an outspoken critic of the war. This is not surprising. In his 1964 Nobel Prize speech, he highlighted war as the third great plague on modern society (the other two being racial injustice and poverty) nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1…
Was the attack on the US Capitol an attempted coup?
Rather than debate that question here (or in another forum), I'm making it an assignment. Specifically, I'm asking my Quantitative Security students to determine if it belongs in our coup/attempted coup datasets.
[THREAD]
A core goal of this course is to introduce students to how Large-N data on violence and security are created.
We put WAY TOO much emphasis on estimators & software (Stata v R 🙄); not enough on the quality of the data going into the analysis.
First, what happened? @johncarey03755 offers a succinct explainer
Rather than share an "IR Book of the Week", here are 5 political science books (and 1 history book) shaping how I'm processing and understanding this moment in America (largely from a Comparative politics perspective)
[THREAD]
Sarah Birch on violence as an instrument for manipulating election outcomes.
@monika_nalepa's work on transitional justice. Addresses how societies (namely new governments) come to terms and address the wrongs committed by the previous government.