Thread by @TimInHonolulu

1. @FoxNews knowingly incited insurrection. I know of no 1stAm defense to the incitement statute. A jury can decide if they knew or were willfully blind to the fact that they were inciting based on objective lies. Can we charge @rupertmurdoch

2. and Fox News Corps investors who control the board and could remove the management but chose not to? Should a jury decide if they are co-conspirators? Are Fox News Corp.'s personal property assets used in the attack subject to seizure and forfeit? @blackrock @Vanguard_Group

3. @TRowePrice @MorganStanley @seanhannity @TuckerCarlson @IngrahamAngle @StateStreet

To @TheJusticeDept @Antitrust Division: Forcing cable customers in monopolistic markets to subsidize Fox News Corp. OAN and NewsMax when it's easy to unbundle is an unlawful Tying Agreement.

4. You could have it enjoined in less than 40 days. If you use Sherman Act criminal sanctions as a sweetener you might get them to act in a week. @FBIWFO

We won't get a second chance to stop this insurrection. If you leave its propaganda organs still intact, we may lose.

5. Roland A. Hernandesz is listed as Fox Corporation's Audit Committee co-chair. I can't find the others who I don't blame for hiding. IMO If they don't hire an outside prosecutor, to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley, they're on the hook. Personally.

6. This isn't a Section 230 civil liability issue. If corporations are people who have political rights, they can commit treason and receive a fiscal death sentence. Shut down the subsidy to hate vendors IMO or the accruing liability has this company in a liquidating Chapter 11

7. in two years. Every state can commence their own Antitrust actions based on their own state statutes. This is not difficult. It's the low hanging fruit left exposed after the insurrection. @NewYorkStateAG @ManhattanDA