What we need is some sort of group or committee made up of brilliant minds that can convene and discern what is truth and what is not, and any speech that is not determined truth will be strictly forbidden— for reasons of public safety.

A truth task force if you will.
These discerners of truth should be chosen from a group who have a history of telling us the truth; such as the group who told us for years that the walls were closing in on Trump due to his role in rigging the ‘16 election (with help from Putin).

[walls are closing in part 1]
And so, for reasons of public safety, Joe Biden needs to form a committee of truth — a truth task force. Then and only then will we as a country be able to achieve true unity and true safety, because there is truth in safety and safety in truth.

[walls are closing in part 2]
If we had a truth committee back in September of 2016 when Hillary slipped on that pebble and fell into that van, Republicans would’ve never gotten any traction spreading that awful lie that she went limp, collapsed, and was thrown into her van like a slab of beef. #BeTrueBeSafe

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Henry

John Henry Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fake_news_u_r

13 Jan
If you are like every other Democrat, you’ve spent the last 4 years screaming, —without evidence— that the 2016 election was rigged/hijacked. And yet that election produced zero electoral irregularities. Zero statistical anomalies.
Imagine the exploding heads if 100% of these bellwether counties had voted Hillary instead of Trump in the ‘16 election, making it the 1st time in history that these voters in these counties didn’t match with the election results. And yet that’s what happened in the ‘20 election.
The number of bellwether counties that did not match with the results of the general election going all the way back to 1984:

1984: 0
1988: 2
1992: 1
1996: 0
2000: 0
2004: 1
2008: 1
2012: 0
2016: 0
2020: 18 <———👀

wsj.com/articles/bellw…
Read 4 tweets
11 Jan
I really do feel like our ruling class politicians have our best interests at heart. No I really do. Public safety seems to be their top priority. Here’s proof.

We are:
Not allowed to run our businesses for reasons of public safety

Not allowed to gather & worship freely for reasons of public safety

Not allowed to question government appointed heath experts for reasons of public safety

Not allowed to speak freely for reasons of public safety
Election laws changed with millions of mail-in ballots mailed out to everyone including dead people for reasons of public safety

Not allowed to observe the counting of votes for reasons of public safety

Not allowed to question the election outcome for reasons of public safety
Read 8 tweets
10 Jan
The fact that you haven’t even attempted to explain any of the irregularities that I pointed out in the thread is telling. So far all I’ve gotten from the left is, “People hated asshole Trump! Dats why!”
Imagine if all of the bellwether counties had gone for Hillary in ‘16. And she had won both Florida and Ohio (easily) but narrowly lost in the battleground states where Republican poll workers forcefully blocked Dem observers from observing the counting process.
That would’ve been all the proof they would’ve needed to overturn the ‘16 election & deny Trump from being inaugurated. But they had absolutely zero electoral irregularities/anomalies to point to in the post-election data indicating that a rigged/unnatural outcome had occurred.
Read 4 tweets
20 Dec 20
Exactly right. I swear history starts today for the Left. They act like Trump didn’t run for president only 4 years ago... back when he was much less popular with Republican voters. A good chunk of Republicans didn’t vote for him in ‘16 because
they thought he would be too liberal. Others Rs didn’t vote for him because they thought he would be too hot-tempered/pro-war.

He proved to be none of that.

And that’s why he gained 12 million more votes in 2020.

And yet we didn’t see this strange no-down-ballot phenomenon.
Despite being much more feared & unpopular with Rs in ‘16, we didn’t see them voting top of the D ticket and yet voting down ballot R like they claim happened this election for which they cite as the reason for why Biden shattered records while down ballot Dems got crushed.
Read 4 tweets
20 Dec 20
[THREAD]
If Hillary had fallen just below 270 EVs, but had won the swing states of NC, FL, IA & OH (comfortably even) but lost in the swing states where Rs blocked Ds from observing, and where they stopped counting & then resumed again with huge spikes for Trump...
And where only 1 bellwether county voted for her opponent (the winner), despite these counties exhibiting near 100% consistency for decades.
And saw her party experience a Blue Wave—flipping 12 seats in the house & winning 27/27 “toss-ups”— while she ends up losing to a guy who goes on to gain more votes than any other presidential candidate in history despite being a cadaver...
Read 4 tweets
18 Dec 20
Another reason why it’s impossible to rig a national election in America: Our country has election laws/safeguards that have been in place for decades. If one party was going to rig 3-4 swing state cities (as Republicans claim happened in 2020) that party would...
... They would have to change those laws in those swing state cities at the last minute. And they would have to do it through a corrupt judiciary rather than through the legislature as the constitution clearly lays out.

[continued]
And if they were do it through a corrupt judiciary, than we would expect to see a corrupt judiciary declining to even hear the evidence post-election. They would most likely simply decline to hear the cases.

[continued]
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!