Andrew Køng Profile picture
24 Jan, 10 tweets, 2 min read
With $50-$500 dApp interaction fees, DeFi mainly just caters to the whales

Major DeFi apps launching on Layer 2 can 10x the number of DeFi users

2021 is the year it happens
But DeFi apps will be launching across a host of different L2s - zksync, Starkware, Optimism, Matic, etc

With long or costly exit times moving between L2 to L1 to a different L2 users don't get the real DeFi UX that make it so magical
Luckily, @thorchain_org exists

People talk about Thorchain in the context of connecting other L1s, but most L2s are separate blockchains themselves that can just as well connect to Thorchain
This means that if Thorchain bridges were built for say Optimism & zksync, users would not need to go through the cumbersome process of moving to L1 first and could instead trade their Optimism coin for the same version of that coin on zksync in one tx
And since transactions on L2 are fast and cheap, so would the transaction to transfer assets between those chains

The UX for moving between chains is dramatically simplified and Arbitragers/Market makers will ensure that the version of each coin is pegged across the L2s
One thing that could make this even sexier is if Thorchain allowed for the existence of stableswap pools i.e.

- They use the Stableswap AMM function
- No RUNE required for these pools as long as they include stable assets (i.e. Optimism ETH - L1 ETH - zksyc ETH)
This means that LPs could provide in these pools with no risk of impermanent loss creating conditions for even larger pools of liquidity between chains to be staked and large amounts of assets could be transferred between L2s in one tx for little slippage
And if you wanted to move your coin from ETH L2 to another L1? e.g. Binance Chain/Solana/DOT

Thorchain could let you do that fast and directly as well without the need of going through a CEX or other poor UX routing process

AMM Tech will connect all worlds
This adds one more to the list of things Thorchain is an indirect bet on:

- Multichain World
- Censorship resistant & no KYC value transfer
- Privacy coins
- Layer 2s
In summary

H/T t.me/thorchain_memes

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Køng

Andrew Køng Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Rewkang

17 Jan
1/ Brief history & Roadmap of @CreamdotFinance

One of the fastest shipping teams in DeFi
2/ August - Launch of CREAM V1 on Ethereum

CREAM V1 launches as a fork of @compoundfinance targeting the long tail of assets, similar to the @UniswapProtocol & @SushiSwap dyanmic

medium.com/cream-finance/…
3/ Within 1 month CREAM surpasses $100M TVL due to quick listing of $YFI

medium.com/cream-finance/…
Read 19 tweets
16 Jan
The YFI minting decision can be distilled down to the following:

Will the value created by minting outweigh the cost of minting (i.e. dilution) for token holders

The answer is clearly yes
Productivity of development is key to protocol growth. A 3x increase in development productivity and output will translate to token price which obviously all of us care about

Love the 30k meme, but retaining + growing contributor/dev talent is more important
YFI is meant to be a productive cash flow producing asset, not digital gold
Read 7 tweets
6 Jan
1/ Liquidity Mining Guidance by @MechanismCap - A Thread

- History
- Incentive Alignment
- Design Considerations
- Liquidity Targeting
Read 6 tweets
4 Jan
1/ There's an interesting dichotomy that has emerged between the #BTC price targets of traditional institutions and the battle-hardened crypto natives

The former targetting $400k-$1m+ have become the moonboys, while the latter is much more conservative targetting $50k-$120k
2/ Previously, I'd align myself closer to the latter group

But the ostentatiousness of the moon targets should not be ignored. It tells me that these massive capital allocators are fully bought in and committed

They've aligned their personal accounts, funds, and social capital
3/ Guggenheim, Scaramucci, Saylor, etc.

They will shill their hearts out with 1000x the impact that any of us can hope to have or thought possible
Read 4 tweets
30 Dec 20
Virtue signaling and FUDDing algorithmic stablecoins without evidence is pretty lame

At the end of the day, no one knows for sure whether a workable model can be found or not

Crypto is all about experimentation and innovation - Let’s keep it that way
The fact that we can battle test these models with billions of $ summoned on this timeline rather than limited simulations is fucking awesome

Economic studies have always been limited by being retrospective, small scale or slow

Crypto allows us to experiment 100x better
This isn’t kindergarten. Anyone that has ever heard of crypto knows that it’s a high risk field

Maybe stick with something like legacy finance if you can’t accept it.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!