1) "Funded by hundreds of millions of dollars from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and other high-tech interests, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system"
assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2042…
2) "Private monies dictated city and county election management contrary to both federal law and state election plans endorsed and developed by state legislatures with authority granted by the United States Constitution."
3) "Executive officials in swing states facilitated, through unique and novel contracts, the sharing of private and sensitive information about citizens within those states with private interests"
4) "This data sharing allowed direct access to data of unique political value to leftist causes, and created new vulnerabilities for digital manipulation of state electronic poll books"
5) "This public-private partnership in these swing states effectively placed government’s thumb on the scale to help these private interests achieve their objectives and to benefit the candidates of one political party."
6) "States have basic, common-sense laws protecting the
integrity of the absentee, advance, or mailed ballot. Beginning in the spring of 2020, left-leaning organizations filed a massive number of lawsuits to challenge these integrity laws."
7) "Swing state governors also started issuing emergency executive orders shutting down in-person voting while pouring new state resources into encouraging persons to vote in advance."
8) "Polling data revealed this coordinated assault on in-person voting generally favored Democrat Party voters who preferred to vote in advance"
9) "These actions represent the beginning of the formation of a two-tier election system favoring one demographic while disadvantaging another demographic."
10) "Zuckerberg-CTCL funds allowed these Democrat
strongholds to spend roughly $47 per voter, compared to $4 to $7 per voter in traditionally Republican areas of the state."
11) Image
12) "In Democrat Delaware County, Pennsylvania, one drop box was placed every four square miles and for every 4,000 voters. In the 59 counties carried by Trump in 2016, there was one drop box for every 1,100 square miles and every 72,000 voters."
13) "Government encouraging a targeted demographic to turn out the vote is the opposite side of the same coin as government targeting a demographic to suppress the vote."

"These irregularities existed wherever Zuckerberg’s money was granted to local election officials."
14) "Managing elections is a core government function that cannot be trusted to private interests. We must not privatize our elections. Such privatization threatens democracy, silences the voice of the electorate, and undermines election integrity."
15) Please note: These are all quotes from the Executive Summary of this report.

Simply wanted to draw attention to what lay inside.

Worth a read-through - even just the first 8 pages.
assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2042…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Carlson

Jeff Carlson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @themarketswork

8 Jan
1) Lots of politicians talking about the "Sanctity" & "Strength" of our "Institutions".

While failing to acknowledge that for a huge swath of Americans, that faith in those same Institutions has been impaired or destroyed.
2) President Trump didn't create this lack of faith. Nor the anger and distrust.

It has long been there, brewing and gathering strength. Precisely because of actions from those same Institutions.

The reactions from the Media & DC to Trump's term solidified those beliefs.
3) We just learned that the IC downplayed the role of China in the election for political purposes.

"Some of our career people, even CIA management, were politicizing China intelligence”
washingtonexaminer.com/news/intellige…
Read 9 tweets
6 Jan
1) Congress is incentivized to see Pence's role as passive.

But Constitutional scholars differ and/or acknowledge that varying interpretations exist.

Note: I am NOT predicting what Pence will do. I will just be highlighting some ambiguities.

(Apologies - will be long thread)
2) Edward Foley is head of Election Law Dept at Ohio U.

He is Left & originator of Blue Shift theory

What follows are quotes from his "war-game" paper published in the Loyola University Chicago Law Journal - Preparing for a Disputed Presidential Election
lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewconten…
3) "As part of an effort to prepare for the risk of a disputed presidential election in 2020, it is imperative to consider how the embarrassingly deficient procedures might operate if they were actually called into play."
Read 25 tweets
5 Jan
“There’s about 16 or 18 of us now that signed this letter to the Vice President … asking him to delay the electoral vote for 10 to 12 days.”

“We were going to get it to him tomorrow morning.”
theepochtimes.com/georgia-state-…
“I think several senators from Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Arizona also wrote letters sent to the Vice President, [telling him] we want the vice president to at least delay it 10 to 12 days.”
Jan 20th is date that matters Constitutionally:

"Terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January"

Pence can, and in my view, should defer.

Allows Audit to proceed. Takes ECA away.

Gives states time to revisit, clarify. With new evidence.
Read 5 tweets
5 Jan
Curious what specific actions Raffensperger took that you see as credible

Judge Totenberg stated repeatedly in ruling that true RLA audits of results using Dominion equipment were inherently not possible.

Ben Adida's (VotingWorks) arguments to contrary were demolished in court.
Raffensperger knew this as he was party to lawsuit. And his general counsel, Ryan Germany, was on at least one critical court hearing.

That didn't stop him from issuing press release celebrating results of RLA as definitive.

Was used by media everywhere.
sos.ga.gov/index.php/elec…
VotingWorks performed the RLA...

Raffensberger also used CISA release on "Election Integrity" at one point to defend Georgia's results.

Despite almost certainly having to know that both Dominion & Pro V&V were part of council that issued statement.
Read 6 tweets
3 Jan
3) …In the morning, new numbers show Trump’s lead starting to slip, and by noon, it is below 20,000. Impatient, Trump holds an impromptu press conference and announces:" Image
4) "So begins the saga over the disputed result of the 2020 presidential election.”

Although familiar, the passage isn’t taken from a recent article describing the Nov. 3, 2020, presidential election. Rather, it comes from a 55-page paper, published on Aug 31, 2019 by Ed Foley.
5) Foley’s paper, more of a Democrat war-game analysis, takes readers on a complicated electoral journey that may well prove to accurately foreshadow events through Jan. 20.

Foley has provided a complicated—but thus far surprisingly accurate—electoral roadmap to be used by Dems.
Read 5 tweets
30 Dec 20
This issue was repeatedly highlighted bu Judge Totenberg:

Dominion’s system “does not produce a voter-verifiable paper ballot or a paper ballot marked with the voter’s choices in a format readable by the voter because the votes are tabulated solely from the unreadable QR code.”
Judge also found that Dominion's QR codes are NOT encrypted:

“Evidence plainly contradicts any contention that the QR codes or digital signatures are encrypted,”

This was “ultimately conceded by Mr. Cobb and expressly acknowledged later by Dr. Coomer during his testimony.”
Judge Totenberg said there was “demonstrable evidence” that the implementation of Dominion’s systems by Georgia placed voters at an “imminent risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote,” which she defined as a “vote that is accurately counted.”
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!