Just what we didn’t need: “In recent days, Fox has taken a sharp turn toward a more extreme approach as it confronts a post-Trump ratings dip — the result of some of its furthest-right viewers moving to outlets such as Newsmax & One America News...” 1/ washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/medi…
...and some middle-of-the-roaders apparently finding CNN or MSNBC more to their liking.” 2/
Fox has thus “decided to add an hour of opinion programming to its prime-time offerings. The 7 p.m. hour will no longer be nominally news but straight-up outrage production.” 3/
“And in a move that should be shocking but isn’t, one of those who will rotate through the tryouts for that coveted spot will be Maria Bartiromo, whose Trump sycophancy during the campaign may well have been unparalleled.” 4/
“Corporations that advertise on Fox News should walk away, and citizens who care about the truth should demand that they do so (in addition to trying to steer their friends and relatives away from the network).” 5/
“Big companies would never do that, you say? Don’t be so sure.
The Post reported last week that the 147 Republican lawmakers who opposed certification of the presidential election have lost the support of many of their largest corporate backers.” 6/
“General Electric, AT&T, Comcast, Honeywell, PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG and Verizon all said they would suspend donations to members of Congress who voted against certifying Biden as president.” 7/
Article by @Sulliview. 8/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jennifer Cohn ✍🏻 📢

Jennifer Cohn ✍🏻 📢 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jennycohn1

23 Jan
Dear @HouseDemocrats: If your intent is to give voters the choice between #HandMarkedPaperBallots & touchscreens (ballot marking devices),please add the phrase shown in caps below or something similar. Otherwise, in-person voters can be forced to use BMDs. TY! #HR! @reptedlieu 1/
2/ With the GOP assaulting vote by mail, we will need reliable in-person voting. Many experts and voters don't consider BMDs reliable. Thank you.
3/ Please note that I wld prefer #HandMarkedPaperBallots (pen and paper) for all voters, with an exception for voters w/ disabilities. If HR1's intent is to instead give voters a choice, then the additional language I set forth above (or similar) is the minimum needed to do that.
Read 5 tweets
23 Jan
What a crock. Trump’s own party killed the #SAFEAct which would have banned internet connectivity to voting systems & required robust manual audits to confirm electronic results in all federal races. He lifted not a finger to pass it. 1/
Read 5 tweets
23 Jan
The DOJ’s “top leaders listened in stunned silence... One of their peers...had devised a plan with ... Trump to oust Jeffrey A. Rosen as acting AG & wield the department’s power to force GA state lawmakers to overturn its presidential election results.” 1/ nytimes.com/2021/01/22/us/…
2/ “The unassuming lawyer who worked on the plan, Jeffrey Clark, had been devising ways to cast doubt on the election results and to bolster Mr. Trump’s continuing legal battles and the pressure on Georgia politicians.”
“Because Mr. Rosen had refused the president’s entreaties to carry out those plans, Mr. Trump was about to decide whether to fire Mr. Rosen and replace him with Mr. Clark.” 3/
Read 5 tweets
20 Jan
Internet connectivity is a real election-system vulnerability. It’s not my fault that bad actors falsely claimed that this vulnerability—which Rs refused to ban—proved fraud. It was a dumb argument accepted by low information voters. We shld still ban internet connectivity. FFS.
The #SAFEAct, which Rs blocked, would have banned internet connectivity to voting systems. The bill passed the Democratic-led House but was blocked by the GOP in the senate. 1/ axios.com/gop-senator-el…
Read 5 tweets
20 Jan
Dear @HouseDemocrats:

HR 1 requires that the voter “have the option to mark his or her ballot by hand.”

Pls add the following for clarity: “For jurisdictions w/ in person voting, this option shall be provided to the voter at the polling place.” @RepTedLieu @katieporteroc 1/
Without this clarifying language, jurisdictions cld still force all in person voters to use risky touchscreen voting machines called ballot marking devices (BMDs), as long as vote by mail is also an option. That won’t suffice to protect election integrity & faith in elections. 2/
Unlike #HandMarkedPaperBallots (pen and paper), BMDs are vulnerable to electronic failure, screen freezes, miscalibration, disproportionate distribution (causing bottlenecks & long lines in suppressed areas), and hacking. 3/
Read 25 tweets
19 Jan
Rs wrote the rules: electronic results would be presumed correct absent reliable evidence to the contrary, & we would NOT require manual audits to confirm them. They wanted to change the rules only after Trump lost. They also wanted to cherry pick where to audit. #NotOK 1/
In February 2020, Rs blocked the #SAFEAct which would have required robust manual audits for all federal races—not just for the presidency and not just for Dominion and not just for the cherry picked places selected by Trump. 2/ axios.com/gop-senator-el…
3/ Rs never cared about election integrity. If they had, they would not have blocked the #SAFEAct. congress.gov/bill/116th-con…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!