Shanmukh Profile picture
25 Jan, 5 tweets, 1 min read
A little commonsense thing that has always eluded our political commentators. There is a Hindu votebase in EVERY single state, from TN to J&K, from Gujarat to Manipur. Is it sufficient to give victory on its own to a party? Often no. But it is a sufficient base to build on.
This is what BJP has done. They have taken over the Hindu base in every state [which comes to 10-20% of the vote] and on this base, they have built up their other voters. Every single party has only ~10-20% core vote only. Rest are all attracted by benefits. So, they rule now.
In the past, there were regional parties [TDP in Telangana, AGP in Assam, JD in Karnataka, etc] that took the Hindu vote, but systematically, BJP wiped them out, making themselves the sole beneficiaries of Hindu vote. This gives them a greater advantage than minority vote often.
Commentators all blabber about how the BJP starts with 0 while its opponents start with 10-20% minority vote. But it escapes them that BJP also starts with a 10-20% Hindu vote in every state, on which the BJP fortunes are built.
Only in places where the BJP has not been able to gather the Hindu vote due to strong local parties [AIADMK in TN, TDP in Andhra, CPM in Malabar, etc] is the BJP weak. But their time is also coming. BJP will wipe them out and take their Hindu vote in the next 10 years.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shanmukh

Shanmukh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @maidros78

25 Jan
1) All in all, by claiming that Raama has no resonance in Bengal, @AITCofficial is making a huge mistake. From the Krittibasi Raamayana, to the 1991 vote [BJP vote rose to 12% in 1991 from 1.6% in 1989] based on just the Raama wave, there is a resonance to Raama in Bengal.
2) In 1991, BJP had no cadre in Bengal and no issue other than the Raama temple. If there were no resonance to Raama, there would certainly not have been a sharp rise in BJP vote share. More importantly, more than just the Raama temple, it was a resonance to a Hindu issue.
3) In fact, Bengal was one of the few states that gave BJP 10% rise in vote share due to Raama wave [others were Karnataka, Goa, Telangana, UP, Rajasthan, and Gujarat]. So, I am surprised that @AITCofficial has forgotten its own electoral history. Bengal is a very Hindu state.
Read 8 tweets
23 Jan
For all those trying to armtwist Vedas into meaning that slaughter of cows was allowed [which, BTW, is based on extremely specious and flawed reasoning], do you also accept slaughter of humans in sacrifices? There are a few such cases - King Somaka, Shunashyepa, etc, no?
Even in the Vedas, the verses which can be armtwisted into allowing cow slaughter are extremely rare. OTOH, those emphasising protection of cows are galore. It is like asking if Jihad is external or internal. There are a few places in the Koran which says that Jihad is internal.
But how do people understand Jihad? We are seeing the results everywhere.

Same way with the Vedas. While some seculars want to armtwist the Vedas into meaning what they want to mean, the clear understanding among the believers is that they enjoin protection of cows, only.
Read 4 tweets
22 Jan
In most cases, as one learns a language, one begins to appreciate the culture and develop a sympathy for the group in question. One even develops an emotional link to the language. Particularly true when the language in question is dharmic, but not completely limited to it.
However, there is one major exception. Languages imposed in schools don't seem to have any emotional attachment. This is a pity because schools should have created a bond between the students and their subjects. However, this doesn't seem to be the case at all for me.
I wonder if this is due to the difference between learning something by choice and something by compulsion. Learning Russian made me sympathetic to Russia [sadly, our RW has not granted me KGB/FSB job, or a Russian wife], but learning English hasn't made me sympathetic to UK/US.
Read 5 tweets
6 Jan
A few suggestions to @virendrarathore on his book, `Prithviraj Chauhan: A light on the mist of history' which, BTW, I recommend to all who have a serious interest in history.

The history presented there is solid and attempts to rationalise the various sources, which diverge.
The book is aimed more at the scholar, and takes a very in depth approach to the history of Prithviraja.

The positives: It focusses on rationalising the history, by putting together the various sources. It also has a focus on Indic sources, which is an excellent thing.
The negative: There is one serious problem. It assumes a lot of knowledge on the part of the reader. This book is not easy for someone who has only a general idea of Prithviraja and his times to read. It would benefit from some additional supplementary material.
Read 8 tweets
21 Nov 20
I saw a few usual suspects attacking @vikramaditya_JK tweet crediting saving of Jammu and Kashmir to His Royal Highness, Maharaja Hari Singh. Shame on them. If it were not for Maharaja Hari Singh and the bravery of JK army, Jammu and Kashmir would have been part of Pakistan.
Maharaja Hari Singh started offering accession to India since late August 1947. He knew that his time was limited then, as he was under serious pressure from Pakistan, and India was not willing to even TALK to the Maharaja till he released Sheikh Abdullah from prison.
And Nehru and Patel had their way. Maharaja Hari Singh was forced to release Sheikh Abdullah, though everyone in JK knew that giving the kingdom to Sheikh Abdullah was the stupidest thing possible. However, Nehru was adamant about Sheikh Abdullah being `people's representative'.
Read 13 tweets
8 Oct 20
Reading history of Tibetan Buddhism, almost all their teachers and concepts were from India. In fact, Bihar has been the biggest contributor to Tibetan Buddhism - the monasteries of Nalanda and Vikramashila gave most Buddhist teachers of central Tibet. Rest from Kashmir/NWFP.
BTW, it is another piece of nonsense that Indians did not travel abroad. They travelled a lot, especially the Buddhist and Hindu teachers. Already [reading history ~1200], I have come across more than a dozen Buddhist teachers from India going to Tibet and teaching there.
In fact, even Nepalese Buddhists routinely got teachers from India-from the same Vikramashila and Nalanda monasteries. In 1100, both were flourishing and producing Buddhist scholars by the ton. So much for `Buddhism died due to Hinduism in India' theories. cc @SVOjha @SAnsumali
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!