#swfc Derby's latest win over QPR leaves Wednesday six points adrift of 21st and safety with two matches in hand.
How have teams in those circumstances done in the previous 22 seasons?
[thread]
First off we have to equalise Derby's points tally to our number of matches.
If we use points won per game for everyone, and how many points that would give them after the same number of matches as us, 23, this is how the table would look:
A gap of 4, not 6, points.
After 23 matches, how often have teams been trailing 21st by 4 or more points?
24 times in the last 22 seasons.
Of those 24 teams just 4, 1 in 6, survived.
In their final 23 matches those 4 survivors won 27, 33, 35 and 40 points respectively:
7 out of 10 teams in bottom 3 after 23 matches ended up relegated:
Half the teams who have finished 21st have done so with 48 to 50 points:
Wednesday, then, probably need another 30 points minimum in the final 23 games.
A point-winning rate of 30/23=1.3 points per game would equal 60 points and 13th over a full season.
Wednesday, then, do not need a miracle; we need, instead, muddied midtable form from here on in:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#swfc I've done alright when researching things online in the past (it's also a not insignificant part of my job).
But just like in 2015, when Dejphon Chansiri bought our club, I am incapable of finding any evidence of his business experience as a CEO online.
(thread below)
Chansiri's older brother by 3 years, Thiraphong, runs the family business formed by his father.
Thiraphong's education (MBA from the US), business experience as a CEO and involvement in a great many businesses also outside the Thai Union Food Group, is easily retrievable online.
I really hope we use a similar ploy to when Luongo played a Libero role, as three centre backs can leave us too depleted further up the pitch against Wycombe's 4-2-3-1. The reason 3-5-2 went out of vogue in the early 2000s was precisely because teams turned to lone front men.
Three defenders in a line against one striker means space elsewhere for the attacking team.
So unless we tep it up, we'll be heavily outnumbered when we're on the ball, if Wycombe pad central areas like they did in their successful game against Watford:
Some interesting discussion (if you're a footy data 🤓 like me at least!) Thursday on the use of Expected Goals (xG), which Reading's wild start to the season has brought a spotlight on.
That's the data I've used in the rest of the tweet thread.
A word of caution, of course, that xG and non-shot xG data aggregated at match level *can* be misleading:
In a probalistic sense, ie. "how likely is the win?", it's better to have one shot all game that is 0.5 xG, a 50% probability of a goal, than 20 shots that are 0.025 xG each