Oh Josh , Seb does not need to be a citizen of the Metis Nation to be Metis, we both know it and for those who don't, I will do my best to help them understand. 
@MistahiSakhikan For starters Josh, MNC who represents the Red River Metis Nation is only 1 of the 2 National Metis organizations in Canada. The other one, until it says otherwise is the 2nd but was the first original one, who got Metis repatriated into the Canadian Constitution.
The 2 National organizations, even though only one of them is truly national are MNC and CAP. CAP who previously was known as NCC. When NCC was repatriating Metis into the 1982 Constitution, MNC was not even an organization at that time. MNC was incorporated as a non-profit
society in 1984. / Canadian Metis Society - formed in 1968 - it ended with the formation of the NCC in 1971. The NCC and MNC have 2 very different definitions of what it means to be a Metis person. Although MNC only changed to that contemporary definition in 2002. In 1978, you
didn't even need to be Aboriginal to join that organization. The History of the Manitoba Metis Federation - Tony Lussier writing in 1978 states - Today a Metis is defined by the MMF as: / MNC had constantly changing goalposts over the years as to who could join their
special little club. / MNC 2002 definition.- windspeaker.com/news/windspeak… -- So back to CAP/NCC shall we?
The Ontario Métis- characteristics and identity-by Evelyn Peters, Mark Rosenberg, & Greg Halseth 1991 - NCC has rejected MNC's definition of Metis.
Constitution Act 1982. - Metis 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬 of Canada - Josh
Behind the Scene of the Send First Ministers Conference on Aboriginal Constitutional Affairs-05190.vol15-3 Mar 1984 NewBreed- MNC trying to convince NCC on Metis Definition. - NCC declined to use their definition.
Constitutional meeting not a complete failure - MNC definition not approved by NCC March 1984 - New Breed.
and well the rest of it Josh pretty well just boils down to this!!" INAC - CAP and MNC - LAC." "Metis Council, CAP may tussle on Daniels - Windspeaker May 2016 pg 6."
Supreme Court of Canada Daniels Decision Section 17 - No one exclusive Metis people in Canada.There is no consensus on who is NonStatus or Metis nor need there be. Can you read Josh? Just sticking your fingers in your ears and saying nah nah nah, doesn't make you right !!
So may I suggest, you quit your fucking Identity policing people. It is Harassment, it is against Human Rights and People have the legal right under International Human Right Law in UNDRIP-to reclaim their identities and communities with no discrimination or harassment.
Josh if you can read- how about you read what is highlighted in the Mccargar Versus MNA case. No one needs to belong to a Metis Assocation to be Metis . NO ONE !!!
I know you think highly of yourself, but your OPINION does not trump established law !! caid.ca/MNADec2018.pdf
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
