🚨 @RayDalio finally releases the Daily Observation on Bitcoin.
Here's your about what the largest hedge fund in the world thinks about $BTC.
1/ First - what you came here for, the investment view.
RD likens Bitcoin to a long-duration option - the type where you wouldn't mind losing ~80% of your principal. Scenario analysis suggests 160% is conservative upside pending a few things.
That's a good start!
2/ Is Bridgwater invested?
Nope, but there is a alt-cash fund being worked on that offers alternative storeholds of wealth as part of BW's "cash is trash" outlook.
Bitcoin will be considered.
3/ RD acknowledges that Bitcoin has probably passed the point where it will stick around and retain some value.
Recognizes that Bitcoin, while finite in supply, has infinite competition (anyone can mint a coin).
Still finding conviction around why BTC has a moat.
4/ RD thinks that since most people likely won't bother with cold storage, custody is an issue and security is a real risk as well.
5/ RD thinks that nation states have the incentive to curtail the use of Bitcoin and prevent it from being a better money than fiat money.
He believes govs can de-anonymize UTXOs and possibly use it as a venue to curtail Bitcoin usage.
6/ However, BW sees macro tailwinds beneficial for alternative storeholds of wealth like $BTC:
e.g. gov bonds no longer offering same return/ diversification benefits, currencies facing risk of depreciation.
7/ BW likes 2 things about $BTC
- Finite supply, which they liken to gold which performs well during stagflation, a probable outcome
- Globally accessible and "most portable Sov". Notes that $BCH, $LTC, $XMR have similar features but have less history and underperformed $BTC
8/ BW is not sure if $BTC will provide portfolio diversification.
A decade is short in finance so there's not enough data to make a diversification case.
Historically $BTC appreciates with rising inflation expectations, but long term correlation with inflation and gold = weak.
9/ Conclusion for above is that so far, $BTC's ability to offer diversification is more theory - meme if you will - than historical fact
10/ BW acknowledges a lot of institutional participation is speculative in nature, so $BTC feels more like an option (a proto-gold?) than digital gold.
Signs: total share of accumulation accounts remain low, turnover is high relative to signs of long-term risk taking.
11/ BW acknowledges that this cycle so far seems less frothy than 2017's retail ICO bubble.
BW notes that rapid price growth, bullish sentiment and rising leverage all indicate bubble risk, but acknowledge these dynamics can last for a long time.
12/ $BTC realized vol since inception is higher than most storeholds of wealth, but BW acknowledges this can change materially over time.
13/ BW sees regulation as a key determinant of the participation of Large Institutional Investors.
Cites Lagarde + Yellen's recent quote about money-laundering.
For the $XRP longs in the back who can't read, here's a picture.
14/ BW thinks clearer regs are key to further upside.
Recent inflows into $BTC are driven by larger tx vs. the smaller, retail dominated tx in 2017.
If institutions participate more meaningfully, BW sees a 160% upside from here (should $BTC take 50% of BTC and gold share).
15/ BW acknowledges that the estimate is conservative and does not factor into liquidity and reflexivity.
e.g. If CBs shift gold exposure to Bitcoin, or BTC ETF launches that can have material impact on prognostications
fin/ that's all!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ The discount you offer to strategic investors is both to account for the risk of an unlaunched product, but also as compensation for continued value add and support.
So make sure you know the investor will support you and not leave you on read once the docs are signed!
2/ Having someone on your cap table/ token allocation is as important as hiring.
You wouldn't hire someone just because they are influencers on Twitter- you do your reference checks and find evidence of value add from other companies the investor has invested in.
As DeFi matures, quantifiable metrics will supplant vaporware memes in determining valuations for cryptoassets.
A brief look at some of the major protocols today 👇
1/ While liquidity is highly mercenary and hence TVL is a poor benchmark for protocol value, it is a serviceable benchmark.
More sophisticated approaches will likely use trailing 6m average TVL to factor in retention.
Here are the DeFi aggregators:
2/ One note here is that there's option value with auxiliary products not reflected here - e.g. $ALPHA has an upcoming perpetual swaps product which may warrant another way of ascertaining a multiple.
Then cross-sell new products. @iearnfinance was somewhat like this but imo they fragmented value capture to too many tokens and diluted brand equity too soon.
Crypto trading - some personal takeaways from 2020
Disclaimer: my job requires picking investments, at times with short/medium term view (days-months), many times with a long term view (years).
This is mostly a thread on reminders to myself relating mostly to the former.
Watch out for decisions based on fear & greed
Confirmation bias (ignoring contrary signals), anchoring bias (married to entry, trading PnL), sizing too big on low r/r trades, hesitating to buy cheap assets because "it's fallen/rallied too much".
/1
One strange thing I noticed in myself in the beginning of my career and among other young investors is the tendency to size too small on ideas with conviction, and size too big on ideas with lower conviction.
It's counterintuitive but it seems common.
1/x
"Dammit I should have sized bigger! I had a strong thesis. I don't know why I didn't."
"Why did I bet so much on this? It's all XXX's fault for fomo'ing me into this."
Statements like this are manifestations of the above.
2/x