Because after all, we should look past “skin color, faith views, and jersey color,” says racism understander Marjorie Taylor Greene, who would go on to insist that black Muslims in Congress were illegitimate because they hadn’t sworn their oath of office on the Bible.
Next, she shows that she really loved this one Maya Angelou quote. She loved it, and Angelou herself, SO much that she gave it like a WHOLE ENTIRE ROW OF HEART EMOJIS YOU GUYS
Would a racist do that?????
Don't make her add a SECOND row
Here the QAnon congresswoman, who's both written & spoken about her belief that Democrats are Satanic child sex traffickers, and who -- like virtually every member of QAnon -- explicitly WANTS to see prominent Democrats die for these imaginary crimes...
wants us all to know she has deep and real and definitely well-founded concerns about child sex trafficking, and also by the way here is an article she wrote about how Democrats are pedo-Satanists (she knows because Breitbart).
Anyway the fake liberal news media would say ANYTHING to silence conservative heroes like Marjorie Taylor Greene.
They might even -- my God! -- report one-tenth of one percent of all the heinous shit she's said and done, because it is newsworthy.
By the way, the evidence of how "deeply concerned" she is for this Black teenager-- are you fucking kidding me? -- is three. Praying-hands. EMOJIS.
Such depth! Such *concern*!
Yes, it sure is a mystery why the press isn't dropping everything to report what emojis MTG put on a Facebook post years ago.
(To be more precise the Angelou post was years ago; the prayer hands post was last year. Whatever. Neither was newsworthy and even MTG has to know that.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So... lemme see if I can lay this out briefly, with the understanding that it's not complete and also I suck at being brief. 😃
@eriksmithcomedy@julianfeeld@nickbackovic What I am looking for -- and I suspect what everyone else is looking for, but IDK if they'd describe it in both terms -- is evidence that is highly relevant *and* highly reliable.
I don't really have a formal procedure where I, like, GRADE pieces of evidence on both points.
@eriksmithcomedy@julianfeeld@nickbackovic But if I did, the evidence that would score highest is always going to be the canonical Q drops: they are 100% relevant to the QAnon movement and they are... not 100% reliable (in that they're missing, so far, 11 lost drops and also the information in them ISN'T TRUE, duh).
Things are going great for Sidney Powell, who -- on her Telegram -- just linked to a long blog post supposedly by Patrick Byrne (the Overstock guy).
The post said Sidney was great and Rudy was, essentially, a senile alcoholic.
But check out this incredible gem from it:
Byrne, by the way, is either a chan-CHUD or a Q follower.
Note his use of "weaponized autism" here.
Naturally in Byrne's universe, HE is the real hero here and the ragtag team of misfits he assembled to Definitely Prove A Big Fraud (and which he apparently turned over to Flynn at some point) were-- well, look!
I remember when I warned that GOP legislatures in swing states would try to pass laws like this, and people went "the voters would NEVER stand for it, they wouldn't dare."
Worth noting the bill isn't introduced by some low-profile backbencher, but by the chair of the Ways and Means Committee.
But wait, somehow there's even more: this bill would REQUIRE that ALL election challenges, no matter how meritless or *legally inadequate* they are, proceed to trial -- and that a jury trial be an option, AND that a judge can't throw the case out until the trial is complete.
For a supposed group of "military intelligence" officers, Q is INCREDIBLY ignorant of what our intelligence agencies do.
Take this drop, in which Q claims that the CIA is being "dismantled" (which: NOPE) & its operations are being transferred to the NSA.
This is BIG DUMB. Why?
'cause the NSA does signals intelligence -- cryptanalysis and hacker shit, basically. It does not do human intelligence or kinetic operations.
The CIA DOES do human intelligence, and has employed doorkickers of various sorts during the Global War on Terror.
The CIA also does *analysis* -- in fact, its job is to get accurate, nuanced information in front of Executive Branch policymakers (and to a lesser extent Congress, but pfft: whatever) so that our geopolitical decisions are made based on all the best info.