Thread by @QOrigins

For a supposed group of "military intelligence" officers, Q is INCREDIBLY ignorant of what our intelligence agencies do.

Take this drop, in which Q claims that the CIA is being "dismantled" (which: NOPE) & its operations are being transferred to the NSA.

This is BIG DUMB. Why?

'cause the NSA does signals intelligence -- cryptanalysis and hacker shit, basically. It does not do human intelligence or kinetic operations.

The CIA DOES do human intelligence, and has employed doorkickers of various sorts during the Global War on Terror.

The CIA also does *analysis* -- in fact, its job is to get accurate, nuanced information in front of Executive Branch policymakers (and to a lesser extent Congress, but pfft: whatever) so that our geopolitical decisions are made based on all the best info.

Transferring CIA operations to the NSA is an insane idea; the NSA isn't equipped to do ANY of those things.

"But Origins," you say, "maybe the CIA's personnel are being transferred to the NSA--"

No. The personnel were the problem. "Impossible to clean," remember?

In other words, this is pure fantasy.

But why does the fantasy APPEAL to Q?

Well, because the NSA is a bunch of white hats in QLand ("Admiral R", referring to the man who headed the NSA when Q first started making drops, is a key figure in the Q mythos).

WHY the NSA would be white hats, I'm not really sure. Q watched the movie "Snowden" and liked it enough to quote it (that's where the "Council of Wizards and Warlocks" comes from). You'd think they wouldn't be a fan of the NSA. 🤷

But they are.

Admiral Rogers is not only a white hat in Q mythology, but the whitest OF the white hats (next to Flynn and, of course, Trump); in the early drops he was actually WAY more prominent than Flynn.

Q hinted that Rogers convinced Trump to run for President, in fact.

One last thought while I'm at it: Q LOVES to talk about "Military Intelligence," capitalized just so, or "MI."

We see "Military Intelligence" in drops 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, and 36; also in one of the lost drops you can find from my pinned tweet.

But... that's pretty weird.

Q writes it as if it's a proper noun -- as if "Military Intelligence" is a thing.

But it's not.

The US has no single agency called "Military Intelligence." It has a *ridiculous* patchwork of agencies, often with overlapping responsibilities.

And then, on top of THAT, the services have staff officers at almost every level whose job is to collect and analyze intelligence that will be relevant to combat commanders.

There IS no unified "Military Intelligence," but Q *always* talks about it as if it's a monolith.

Correction: @sickathehighhat points out that what Q was *really* hinting at was that Rogers met with Trump in November 2016, to warn him that Obama was wiretapping Trump Tower (which, to be clear, Obama wasn't doing; it seems the meeting was about Rogers staying on as NSA head).