1/ New update for @fraxfinance will have the protocol yield farm with reserves
This is a pretty major positive change that increases the resiliency of the system and can see other reserve-based algo stablecoins adopting this mechanism as well
2/ The issue with all algo stablecoins is that the supply of the stablecoins are too interconnected with the price of the share token
The reflexivity works in both directions - both up and down
Higher price🔄 More Supply
Lower price🔄 Less Supply
3/ This reflexivity exists for as long as share tokens are used to reward those that hold the stablecoin (usually for LPs)
But using yield farming to *safely* yield farm can help to prevent death spirals as the yield can be used to build reserves, making users less likely to run
4/ If reserves are high enough, the yield can also be used to directly benefit share token ($FXS) holders by using proceeds to buy & burn
This also indirectly spurs supply growth/reverse as $FXS price rises
5/ To some, this might seem too dangerous
but this is no different from how banks/USDC/USDT make $ - by monetizing customer deposits
The difference is in DeFi, it is all done transparently on-chain for anyone to audit
6/ Quick Math
75M USDC in reserves - 80% is used to farm (60M)
At conservative 10% net APY (after fees) if USDC went to USDCyearnV2 vault, that’s $6M annualized
That’s roughly 25% of current $22M circulating MC of FXS
7/ If the burn starts to have an effect and sends the system into another positive feedback loop then the amount of reserves sent out to farm could potentially reach mid 9 figures+ which would have a significant impact on TVL for @iearnfinance and its farms eg @CurveFinance
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People talk about Thorchain in the context of connecting other L1s, but most L2s are separate blockchains themselves that can just as well connect to Thorchain
The YFI minting decision can be distilled down to the following:
Will the value created by minting outweigh the cost of minting (i.e. dilution) for token holders
The answer is clearly yes
Productivity of development is key to protocol growth. A 3x increase in development productivity and output will translate to token price which obviously all of us care about
Love the 30k meme, but retaining + growing contributor/dev talent is more important
YFI is meant to be a productive cash flow producing asset, not digital gold
1/ There's an interesting dichotomy that has emerged between the #BTC price targets of traditional institutions and the battle-hardened crypto natives
The former targetting $400k-$1m+ have become the moonboys, while the latter is much more conservative targetting $50k-$120k
2/ Previously, I'd align myself closer to the latter group
But the ostentatiousness of the moon targets should not be ignored. It tells me that these massive capital allocators are fully bought in and committed
They've aligned their personal accounts, funds, and social capital
3/ Guggenheim, Scaramucci, Saylor, etc.
They will shill their hearts out with 1000x the impact that any of us can hope to have or thought possible