1/ New update for @fraxfinance will have the protocol yield farm with reserves

This is a pretty major positive change that increases the resiliency of the system and can see other reserve-based algo stablecoins adopting this mechanism as well
2/ The issue with all algo stablecoins is that the supply of the stablecoins are too interconnected with the price of the share token

The reflexivity works in both directions - both up and down

Higher price🔄 More Supply
Lower price🔄 Less Supply
3/ This reflexivity exists for as long as share tokens are used to reward those that hold the stablecoin (usually for LPs)

But using yield farming to *safely* yield farm can help to prevent death spirals as the yield can be used to build reserves, making users less likely to run
4/ If reserves are high enough, the yield can also be used to directly benefit share token ($FXS) holders by using proceeds to buy & burn

This also indirectly spurs supply growth/reverse as $FXS price rises
5/ To some, this might seem too dangerous

but this is no different from how banks/USDC/USDT make $ - by monetizing customer deposits

The difference is in DeFi, it is all done transparently on-chain for anyone to audit
6/ Quick Math

75M USDC in reserves - 80% is used to farm (60M)

At conservative 10% net APY (after fees) if USDC went to USDCyearnV2 vault, that’s $6M annualized

That’s roughly 25% of current $22M circulating MC of FXS
7/ If the burn starts to have an effect and sends the system into another positive feedback loop then the amount of reserves sent out to farm could potentially reach mid 9 figures+ which would have a significant impact on TVL for @iearnfinance and its farms eg @CurveFinance

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Køng

Andrew Køng Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Rewkang

24 Jan
With $50-$500 dApp interaction fees, DeFi mainly just caters to the whales

Major DeFi apps launching on Layer 2 can 10x the number of DeFi users

2021 is the year it happens
But DeFi apps will be launching across a host of different L2s - zksync, Starkware, Optimism, Matic, etc

With long or costly exit times moving between L2 to L1 to a different L2 users don't get the real DeFi UX that make it so magical
Luckily, @thorchain_org exists

People talk about Thorchain in the context of connecting other L1s, but most L2s are separate blockchains themselves that can just as well connect to Thorchain
Read 10 tweets
17 Jan
1/ Brief history & Roadmap of @CreamdotFinance

One of the fastest shipping teams in DeFi
2/ August - Launch of CREAM V1 on Ethereum

CREAM V1 launches as a fork of @compoundfinance targeting the long tail of assets, similar to the @UniswapProtocol & @SushiSwap dyanmic

medium.com/cream-finance/…
3/ Within 1 month CREAM surpasses $100M TVL due to quick listing of $YFI

medium.com/cream-finance/…
Read 19 tweets
16 Jan
The YFI minting decision can be distilled down to the following:

Will the value created by minting outweigh the cost of minting (i.e. dilution) for token holders

The answer is clearly yes
Productivity of development is key to protocol growth. A 3x increase in development productivity and output will translate to token price which obviously all of us care about

Love the 30k meme, but retaining + growing contributor/dev talent is more important
YFI is meant to be a productive cash flow producing asset, not digital gold
Read 7 tweets
6 Jan
1/ Liquidity Mining Guidance by @MechanismCap - A Thread

- History
- Incentive Alignment
- Design Considerations
- Liquidity Targeting
Read 6 tweets
4 Jan
1/ There's an interesting dichotomy that has emerged between the #BTC price targets of traditional institutions and the battle-hardened crypto natives

The former targetting $400k-$1m+ have become the moonboys, while the latter is much more conservative targetting $50k-$120k
2/ Previously, I'd align myself closer to the latter group

But the ostentatiousness of the moon targets should not be ignored. It tells me that these massive capital allocators are fully bought in and committed

They've aligned their personal accounts, funds, and social capital
3/ Guggenheim, Scaramucci, Saylor, etc.

They will shill their hearts out with 1000x the impact that any of us can hope to have or thought possible
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!