Sunshiny Profile picture
29 Jan, 21 tweets, 4 min read
Well, well, well.

Independent economic report commissioned by provincial BCNDP government recommending help for those in need, BUT NOT UBI.

Economists recommend raising rates for those in poverty. Reorganizing benefits available. But not UBI.
While the concept of UBI is attractive, the cost is prohibitive.

Unless the federal government renegotiates social program transfer payments and expectations, UBI is untenable.

With 7 conservative premiers at the helm, a UBI seems quite unlikely any time soon.
I believe I said that a few years ago. Could have saved BC millions in a 2 year analysis and report.

How anyone could expect a different outcome is baffling!?!

Provinces are responsible for social programs, not the federal government.
Making UBI a moonshot at best and hardly achievable if the premiers refuse to cooperate.

Guess what? The conservative premiers will outright reject a suggestion of UBI, because it will raise their budget requirements.

That’s what happens when conservatives are elected.
Obstructionism.

That’s the conservative motto. Reject any improvements to social programs. It’s their ideology.

They don’t believe government should be supplying benefits at all. Which is why they provide less than subsistence benefits to the most vulnerable.
We’re it up to this batch of conservatives (who are actually paleolibertarians) also known as Christian Nationalists, they’d cancel all social programs and transfer social programs to faith communities. Thus far they’ve not been able to transfer part of the expense.
Understanding the political realities is part of politics. So many refuse to accept reality.

Demanding a UBI be implemented by federal government with no comprehension of the provincial purview and political leanings of the premiers is demagogic populism.
Which is what Greens and NDP do best. Raise expectations of those most vulnerable to poverty and suffering to gain political support.

It enrages me to watch political parties raise the hopes of people with low incomes to expect UBI. It’s political opportunism.

It’s cruel.
The provinces are not going to approve of UBI any time soon.

Go back and read the article. Even the BC NDP government clawed back some of the additional benefits provided by the federal government for covid relief.
That’s federal taxes from all Canadians that BC put into their provincial treasury to redistribute elsewhere. At the expense of those living day to day on less than subsistence income. Each person in poverty that qualified for the benefit had their provincial benefits reduced.
The funds are then in the possession of the provincial government to redistribute to other more deserving programs or projects.

At least BC allowed some of the federal benefit to make it to the people who needed it most. Ontario and Alberta clawed it all back.
Making those in dire need no better off than if the federal government had done nothing. It’s almost as if premiers colluded to nullify the federal government’s assistance to the most vulnerable.
Unless we rewrite the constitution and reassign social programs to federal purview, or stop electing political parties and candidates who work to exacerbate the needs of the most vulnerable (to own the libs), the abuse and substandard care of the most vulnerable will continue.
Constantly demanding the federal government implement a UBI has become the mantra of GPC and NDP supporters. Some Liberal party supporters too. But its all in vain. The provinces are blocking a UBI, not the federal government.
If you don’t understand how political decisions are made & how the separation of federal & provincial powers impacts decisions, then you’re more likely to blame the feds for abandoning the poor, disabled and LTC during Covid. Which is the rhetoric repeated by left opposition.
There is a reason I’ve criticized the left opposition parties so harshly.

Because they are currently using demagogic populist rhetoric too in order to gain political support and divide the nation into tribal politics. Which ultimately serves Conservative party interests.
I don’t think it’s an accident or a misunderstanding. The fact BCNDP Horgan claws back Covid benefits from the most vulnerable is clear indication his party knows feds attempted to assist the most vulnerable. But his province neutered that assistance by clawing it back.
Politics is a dirty game. Modern politics is rife with obstructionism and sabotage.

But if you know how politics works, you don’t fall for demagoguery and false hope.

It’s not LPC denying the most vulnerable assistance to survive covid. It’s provinces.
I wonder why so many scandals keep being lobbed at LPC and PMJT in particular? Hmmm?

Maybe because he’s actually trying to help Canadians. Not to win political support, but because he may actually care about the welfare of the most vulnerable during a global deadly pandemic.
So, what does that say about opposition party leaders who criticize those efforts and muddy waters by confusing purview? And those premiers who block LPC efforts? I know what it says to me.

You have to decide what it says to you.

Reject demagoguery.
I also said this was the case since a minority government was elected. And pointed out several false arguments made by left opposition that were used to create a minority government.

Seems I actually understand what I’ve been opining about.

Who would have thought? 🧐🤨

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sunshiny

Sunshiny Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sunnshiiny

30 Jan
@Kaleido45374749 As for this tidbit. The twinning of the highway is a major infrastructure investment. It isn’t to improve access to camping sites. It’s probably part of China’s BRI. The Belt and Road Initiative.
@Kaleido45374749 A more appropriate provincial choice would have been to twin the highway to Ft Mac. There have been a number of deaths on the highway and it’s been sites as high priority for several years.

But this road in central Alberta won out.

Why?
@Kaleido45374749 Because the corridor to Rocky Mountain House is where China wants to go and provides access to the natural resources China wants. Along with a few other foreign buyers.

What’s under those mountains? A huge natural gas reserve. Coal in the mountains and pristine timber.
Read 28 tweets
30 Jan
So...

I thought I would give this a few days for people to mull over the KXL fiasco.

But Kenney also made one hell of an admission in his news conference on Monday January 18, 2021.

He confirmed that Jason Luan was telling the truth in November 2020.
Luan stated emphatically that the province was waiting until the capacity of hospitals was almost at maximum before the province would impose any additional measures. Amid public outrage, he backtracked and withdrew his comments.

ca.news.yahoo.com/cabinet-member… Image
You know how UCP (just like Trump) has so many scandals that it’s difficult to remember them all and it’s tricky to figure out which one to focus on first?

Well, that’s typical for UCP news updates. You never know how many scandals and dirty deals will be exposed.
Read 49 tweets
29 Jan
Ignorance is rife in Edmonton municipal politics.

Edmontonians cannot afford to re-elect climate deniers.

Conspiracy theorists need to be removed from public office.

Western Standard should be filtering these nuts out. Not giving them a platform to spread disinformation.
The dedication to presenting both sides is ridiculous and dangerous. There are NOT two sides to scientific proof. Climate change is real and so is Covid. Reality is not subjective.

There are no alternate realities. To suggest otherwise is diabolical.
People like Dziadyk are a menace to society.

The public needs to loudly reject this nonsense.

We are under siege by conspiracy theorists who seek to destroy democracy. Who is funding these people? If we can determine that, we should boycott them and let everyone know why.
Read 5 tweets
27 Jan
Please check this out.

Check the lame attempt to distance this behaviour from Conservatives & pin it on People’s Party. A fringe party. When CPC clearly contributed toxic rhetoric to the two assassination attempts on PMJT this past July 2020.

globalnews.ca/news/7600018/r…
This article makes me feel very unsafe.

A sub machine gun. Not that I’m familiar with gun terminology, but yikes!

This arrest does demonstrate that the unhinged far right stochastic terrorist (or many of them) is a probability in Canada.

But how many of them are there?
The article doesn’t say. But “where we go one we go all” is the Q’Anon motto. And there are literally millions of Q’Anon in Canada.

Q’Anon is a internet based death cult, spreading globally like wildfire.

Many of the Capitol rioter insurgents have been confirmed as Q’Anon.
Read 25 tweets
27 Jan
Listen to these podcasts please.

Listen to how calm one of the “Chicago Boys” is while he describes implementing austerity that killed people and a violent regime that murdered the elected leader and many citizens. Disappeared many more.
Does this situation not sound eerily similar to what happened during the Capitol riot & act of insurrection but failed on January 6, 2021? A mere 4 weeks ago tomorrow?

That’s because it’s the same group behind the Capitol riot: US far right and wealthy libertarian plutocrats.
Chile was the first in a series of US sponsored coups to permanently install neoliberal free market ideology and Austrian economics (Mises, Hayek, Friedman) in vulnerable nations to enhance the profits of the wealthy and prevent any changes to redistribute wealth to the poor.
Read 10 tweets
26 Jan
The inconsistency in cons narrative is hilarious 😆

So do CPC know up from down? Left from right?

Or do they just say whatever they think Canadians want to hear to obtain and maintain power?

That’s called DEMAGOGIC POPULISM
The emergence of demagogic populism did not originate with Trump, or with the Reform Party in Canada. Demagoguery is as old as politics.

But the current form is horrifically diabolical and toxic to western democracy.

thegeopolitics.com/demagogue-popu…
While this article calls this iteration of demagogic populism fringe, it’s definitely crossed into mainstream.

It’s destroying the very foundations of democracy. Which is precisely what it is designed to do. Politicians don’t need to stay in power to inflict long term damage.
Read 27 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!