The #HS2 protesters are heroes. HS2 is the Concorde of the 21st Century: a money-guzzling, carbon-pumping white elephant that - if it ever comes to fruition - will serve the rich at everyone else's expense. theguardian.com/environment/20…
I suspect that as the business case for HS2 becomes ever more absurd, the project will eventually be abandoned, but not before many £bns have been spent, and more precious habitats destroyed. The protesters are speaking truths that even the government will one day have to hear.
From the beginning, you had to believe several impossible things to justify #HS2, as I explained here, when it was costed at a mere £25bn. Now you also have to believe that long distance business transport across the UK will return to pre-pandemic levels. monbiot.com/2010/05/17/fas…
Like the rest of the business and environmental case for the railway, this belief relies on magical thinking.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Imagine what a different country this would be if Blair had put the political effort he invested in the Iraq War into political and electoral reform instead. If Labour take power again, they must not waste the chance to replace our unfair system and create lasting change.
If this is to happen, Starmer needs to begin work on it now, not in 2024. He needs to start explaining the case for change, not least to his own party, which retains a self-destructive obsession with first-past-the-post.
With a fair electoral system, with Labour prepared to work with other progressive parties, it's hard to see how the Tories could ever again dominate our politics. Labour might never win an absolute majority, but they would be more likely to sustain a share of power.
If you begin with the belief that the pandemic is a fraud, you relieve yourself of the need to imagine an effective public health policy.
The "PCR test scandal" exists in some people's minds, but does not correspond to reality: covidfaq.co/Claim-91-of-Co…
It seems that once you fall down the rabbit hole, you keep falling. Naomi’s tweet has brought out a host of familiar atrocity deniers, climate science deniers, anti-vaxxers etc, who are now determined to prove that Covid-19 is not a dangerous or widespread disease.
Help please. Recent paper says: "The feed of organic dairy cows incorporates a signif higher proportion of grazing (29.5% compared to 0.5%)". The study it refs isn't online.
Is it really true that only 0.5% of non-org dairy feed comes from grazing?
Peer reviewed papers only plse.
I've now found the referenced source. It's in German and 415pp, but as far as I can tell, searching for both Molkerei and Milchhandlung, it doesn't provide the stated figures. I'm intrigued though. econstor.eu/handle/10419/8…
Thank you Twitter! Two German speakers have now replied, pointing out that the Nature paper contains a mistake. The actual figure in the source ref is 5%, not 0.5%. Very helpful. I'll write to the authors.
I argue that some lies about the pandemic are so dangerous that they should simply be banned. Why should we value the right to spread false information above the right to life?
This week’s column. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I also discuss some pretty startling hypocrisy. The co-founder of the excellent Anti-Virus site is Sam Bowman (@s8mb). In his day job @ASI, he attacks public health messaging, in ways that happen to coincide with the interests of the tobacco industry, which, er, helps fund @ASI.
The Adam Smith Institute has also made statements about climate breakdown, malnutrition and other issues which are just as idiotic and unscientific as those Bowman rightly exposes on Anti-Virus. Good work on Covid, Sam, but physician, heal thyself.
We should take air pollution as seriously as we take the pandemic. It causes a wide range of terrible conditions. But once again, the government fails to protect us. theguardian.com/environment/20…
If anything, social norms, unchecked by either public information campaigns or law enforcement, are heading in the wrong direction.
I seldom used to see people sitting in their parked cars with the engines idling. Now it's everywhere.
It's madness. I see drivers looking at their phones with the engine running, wasting fuel and creating a cloud of toxic smoke. On my way home, 30 minutes later, they're still at it.
Perhaps they're texting their friends to complain about the cost of petrol.
A "post-viral tsunami" is gathering, with devastating consequences for large numbers of people. Some of its effects closely resemble ME/CFS, a condition whose 250,000 sufferers in the UK have been horribly neglected.
It's time for action.
My column. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
There's a grim fact we have to face: for some people, Long Covid is likely to mean Lifelong Covid. The sufferers, like people with ME/CFS, will be seen as "inconvenient patients", and governments will be tempted to brush them under the carpet. We cannot let this happen.
Long Covid can hit anyone, including young, fit and healthy people with only the mildest initial infections. It can cause brain damage, heart damage, lung damage and many other effects. Ending lockdown too early is likely to condemn some people to a lifetime of suffering.