Supporters of caning in schools are traumatized Kenyans proving that caning in schools is demeaning and doesn't work.
A thread.
Most of the people supporting violence in schools have nothing to say other than that kids deserve it. They have nothing to do except throw bile, trantrums and insults. That's already a sign.
But it points to another sign of trauma.
It's what Catherine Liu, art and media scholar, calls defeatism a refusal to think, and the replacement of contradiction with difference. We who believe in dealing with contradictions say "your position contradicts mine," and we explain our position so as to convince you of it.
We who name contradictions have explained that "indiscipline" comes from the contradictions of the school system. We expect from the school system what we don't invest in it. We expect excellence from our children while providing them with mediocrity.
But those who are obsessed with difference say "you make me unconfortable with your point of view, because I am different from you. So I do not need to talk to you, I do not need to explain my position or persuade you."
So the "difference" people say: "I turned out ok after being caned. Aka, the issue isn't violence, it's about difference of opinion. So since I support caning, you should support caning not because you are convinced or it's right, but because you must respect my difference."
This response is a form of narcissism. It's essentially saying "you think differently from me and that makes me uncomfortable, so make me comfortable by saying that you accept me as I am." It's an inability to deal with human beings who are not you, which means all human beings.
That narcissism comes from the trauma of the school system. The school system punishes kids for being themselves and not fitting into a box determined by the exams or the state. Each time you fail, you're punished for being stupid, each time you pass, unajiringa.
So when supporters of school violence hear an opinion different from theirs, they remember their school trauma when they were punished for being different from what was system expected. So they react and demand acceptance of difference, rather than discuss the contradiction.
So when Kenyans say that kids are indisciplined and refuse to see that we can't get disciplined kids from a violent school system, what they are really saying is "talking about the violent school system makes me uncomfortable. It makes me fear punishment for seeing a truth."
Supporters of caning are saying: "Don't talk about violent schools. I'm more comfortable denying that there's something wrong with the schools, and with expecting children to come out of the violent system as angels. I'm comfortable denying there is a contradiction."
Supporters of caning are also saying: "I am denial, but it's your job to accept me in denial because my denial is a form of difference, and if you accept my difference, you must accept caning."
In other words, with this fake disagreement, caning supporters are proving that they are uncomfortable with the truth about our school system, meaning that they are in denial, denial which came from their schools, which means they are proving violence in school doesn't work.
And if this argument about the narcissism of caning supporters is confusing for you, then yes, that's what trauma does. It twists ideas and makes people's ideas and logic jumbled and confused. Which comes trauma which comes from our twisted education system.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A few weeks ago, I asked this question: since Muigai doesn't respect the 2010 constitution, why is he invested in #BBInonsense, and in getting Kenyans to accept? He can just run for another term, send cops to kill people, the US will support him and he will remain in office.
The great #KOT explained this to me: #BBINonsense isn't about destroying the constitution. It's about destroying the story. Unfortunately, the only story which we use to challenge Muigai is the constitution.
We don't know our history, we have no theology, our arts are commercialized, our cultures are corrupted, and our education is destroyed. The last pillar standing between us and full scale uthamaki fascism is the Constitution 2010. #BBINonsense#UhuruinSagana
My friend from another country is traumatized by the stories of school violence that Kenyans are casually recounting.
He can't believe the levels of violence, and the lack of moral outrage.
Outsiders' reactions help us see the absurdity of what we call "normal." #tyrannyof3pc
Kenya has accomplished the feat that our mother country Britain has: we cover up our reality so effectively and project a different image of ourselves. That's why my friend is shocked that Kenya is like this. We are so good at cover up.
Cover up has become an instinct with us Kenyans, that during the PEV, the first concern of the elites was not the people dying, but what would happen to the Kenya brand. This brand thing is repeated to us through the colonial rhetoric of tourism. theelephant.info/features/2018/…
If you continue to report the Jubilee nonsense expressed by the president in Central to the exclusion of the rest of Kenya, you lose the right to lecture us about unity and BBI.
Get a conscience.
The media needs to speak with one voice and decide tell the president that it is unethical to talk on such important nation issues to the exclusion of everybody else, and then preach that BBI is for inclusion. That's an insult to our dignity and intelligence.
And don't listen to cultural purists with that tired argument about pride in our languages. It's a lazy, argument that doesn't apply here. We have an African language called Kiswahili that is accessible to more Kenyans.
.@NationAfrica knows that it doesn't have the argument to justify promoting TVET in its current colonial form. So they get young students to write articles so that Mwalimu here finds it difficult to challenge a young person.
When it comes to complicated things like policy, the responsible thing to do is get experts to write. During the CBC roll out, I constantly asked media to host a debate where the experts who wrote the thing defend it. No such debate happened. We still don't know who wrote CBC.
We have noted that commercial media houses have become notorious for not employing seasoned journalists. Journalists are not allowed to improve their craft and carry out long term investigations. Most are let go to join public relations, the few who remain become managers.