We found a set of 13 websites with a total of 70 "authors" with GAN-generated face pics, each with a corresponding Twitter account using the same GAN-generated image. The accounts were all created in August or September 2020, and all (allegedly) tweet via the Twitter Web App.
As is the case with all unmodified StyleGAN face pics, the major facial features (particularly the eyes) are in the same location on each image, regardless of the angle of the head. This trait becomes particularly apparent when all 70 images are blended together.
The 13 websites these accounts are theoretically "authors" for are also the websites most frequently linked by the network of supporting Twitter accounts. Online gambling and forex trading are the main topics of these "news" sites.
Each of the 13 websites has a page showing their "team", featuring the AI-generated pictures of the supposed "authors" accompanied by self-similar biographies that somewhat frequently feature rather odd grammar.
Although most of the websites are in English, we did find one in German (casinonews(dot)de(dot)com). It's quite possible that we did not find the entire network and additional sites in other languages exist as well.
The majority of the websites feature exactly six AI-generated authors. Exceptions include the aforementioned German-language site casinonews(dot)de(dot)com with three, casinonews(dot)world with five, and sportsbettingnews(dot)day with two.
Here are screenshots of the "team" pages from the remaining four websites, for the sake of completeness. We found what appears to be a slight mistake on the fxperk(dot)com "team" page..
In what is either an error on the part of whoever set up these websites or a bug in a script that populated the "team" pages, fxperk(dot)com "author" Catherine Johnson's biography begins with the words "Sample Description".
This isn't the first time we've encountered a network of websites with GAN-generated "authors" and corresponding Twitter accounts. Here's a thread on another group we studied recently that may well be part of the same operation:
We belatedly noticed that the Twitter version of one of the GAN-generated pics used by this network has been cropped slightly, possibly to hide a weird blob on the top of the head. (This also knocks the eyes on the Twitter version slightly out of alignment with the other pics.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
While looking at something unrelated, we ran across a bulk follow botnet created in May 2018. A few of the accounts in this network have recently reactivated. #ThursdayThoughts
This bulk follow botnet consists of (at least) 46414 accounts, all created in May 2018. (It's likely we missed a few.) None has ever liked a tweet, and most have no tweets or followers of their own but follow between 50 and 200 accounts.
Who do the accounts in this network follow? It's kinda all over the place, although social media marketing and cryptocurrency turn up as repeated themes. The account followed by the largest share of the network is Indian politician @indutiwarijbp.
Do you want to have your fundraiser tweeted to 4 million+ donors on large Twitter pages? Given that @MonsterFundrise and its eight recently-created clones have just over 2000 followers between them, we're skeptical they can pull it off, but we took a look.
We checked out monsterfundrise(dot)com via Tor (always exercise caution when visiting potentially shady websites), which claims to promote your GoFundMe to 1 million followers via "5 Large Twitter Pages". Needless to say, we didn't whip out our "creidt cards" (sic).
Thus far, oatmeal is the clear victor with 14087 tweets from 13240 accounts, compared to 10854 tweets/9966 accounts for cream of wheat. Although not mentioned in @nhannahjones's original tweet, grits put in a strong showing as a third-party candidate (4752 tweets/4199 accounts).
We ran VADER sentiment analysis on the porridge tweets. Since the topic is tasty foodstuffs rather than political candidates, it is perhaps not surprising that the ten-minute average sentiment scores for all three cereals are positive throughout.
A conspiracy theory that a member of Joe Biden's Secret Service detail is his "Chinese government handler" has been floating around MAGA Twitter since the inauguration. (The man in question is of Korean descent and has worked for the Secret Service for years.)
The false claim that one of the Secret Service agents guarding Biden is his "Chinese Handler" started popping up here and there in December 2020 (and possibly earlier, as it's not unlikely that some related content was removed as part of Twitter's recent QAnon purge).
The bogus "Biden's secret service agent is his CCP handler" narrative appears to have gained traction on two previous occasions. The first was December 19th, 2020, and was the result of multiple accounts misrepresenting a video posted by @TheHill of Biden attending church.
In Aug 2020, someone redirected antifa(dot)com to joebiden(dot)com, and has now switched it to whitehouse(dot)gov. Even though anyone can buy a domain and point it at any website, some folks falsely insist Biden is affiliated with the antifa(dot)com domain name.
Whoever bought the antifa(dot)com domain also appears to have briefly pointed it at kamalaharris(dot)org and buildbackbetter(dot)gov. Again, this does not require the consent or involvement of the website being redirected to.
We downloaded tweets containing links to antifa(dot)com. There are four spikes in tweet volume, corresponding to when major accounts noticed the redirect and tweeted about it. (Earlier traffic is off-topic and extremely light, and has thus been excluded from this analysis.)
Are tweets about Xinjiang from @ChineseEmbinUS being artificially amplified by a network of repetitively named batch-created accounts? (Spoiler: yes, and they retweet other Chinese diplomatic and state media accounts as well.)
We downloaded recent retweets of @ChineseEmbinUS's tweets, and noticed several spikes in account creation (mostly in early 2020). The accounts created during these spikes have distinctive patterns in their names, similar numbers of tweets/likes, and so on.
By exploring the retweeters of the other tweets retweeted by these accounts, we found a total of 674 batch-created accounts, created between December 2019 and January 2021. The naming schemes sometimes vary from batch to batch (table show representatives examples).