When the Women and Equalities Committee asked the testifying gender critical "experts" what they considered a good solution to the supposed "conflict of rights" around legal gender recognition things got very wacko
Well I think the government needs to make the law. And define the laws. And the law has to be written down. And it needs to be enshrined. This is what happens in other countries. The government cannot avoid the fact that it is in charge of this
she is a law professor
none of this is about legal gender recognition, once again just not an answer to the question she was asked
update the other countries have the laws but not the definitions. no one has the definitions. we need the definitions. and we cannot let the definitions be changed by stealth
actual lol
I have posted this part before but the testimony does not improve
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The lady simply has no clue what research already exists, does not understand how psychiatric diagnoses work, and interprets the tiny amount of research she encounters like she’s reading tea leaves from the moon
(reading that children with gender dysphoria have high rates of attachment styles that develop in response to struggling to get acceptance and support from caregivers): this shows they should get conversion therapy