Liberating update #2 to my zettelkasten system this week:

Literature notes are allowed to be *verbatim* from the source material.
Fleeting Notes are always in my own words, and spin off from the content.

Literature notes are summaries of important ideas and may or may not be verbatim.

Evergreen notes are often my words, but designate authorship so as long as that’s present could also be verbatim.
The goal here is to KEEP THE IDEAS FLOWING.

Within a zettelkasten, momentum is paramount.

There is significant cognitive burden associated with putting something in your own words or coming up with original ideas.

That self-inflicted resistance should be treated with care.
While reading material, you want to be agile — moving through the content with ease.

*capturing fleeting ideas*
*summarizing main points*

Forcing yourself to constantly process the summaries in your own words can grind the gears to a halt.
Now I’m not saying that that work isn’t worth it — because it is!

Putting something in your own words is a REALLY effective way to confirm understanding and process the information.

But it probably shouldn’t be *minimum requirement*.
As long as authorship is clear, and you can trace information back to the source material — and you are not at risk of mistaking someone else's words as your own...

Then I consider the “in your own words” caveat a bottleneck to connecting your ideas (and the ideas of others).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brandon Toner 🌱

Brandon Toner 🌱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @brandontoner

27 Dec 20
Questions are tricky. Really tricky.

Is it indicating an actionable research pursuit? Or a rhetorical prompt? Is it context-specific, or more universal? How well could you form an answer? If actionable, how urgent?

Or could it simply sit, and simmer; percolate.
As I try on my questions processes, I’m again feeling limited.

Questions can also label the time stamp of the question the author is attempting to answer. So the question really labels an answer, while preserving the target question in mind.

As such, it’s more directional.
As it relates to content, I really need several domains:

Questions indicating the purpose of the highlighted passage.

Questions indicating gaps in understanding.
Read 4 tweets
27 Dec 20
Now for "how does this look in Roam"...

Emerging ideas to follow.
My goal is to MINIMIZE RESISTANCE to MAXIMIZE FLOW.

I want to capture ALL resonant ideas, and to move things up the maturity progression as quickly as my clarity allows.
Common inputs for "literature" notes/questions:

Podcasts: @AirrAudio
Articles: @worldbrain
Twitter: @readwiseio
Books: @AmazonKindle

All sent to @RoamResearch in a standardized template using the @readwiseio integration *chef's kiss*
Read 10 tweets
27 Dec 20
I am determined to find an expression of zettelkasten that makes sense to me.

An idea management system that "just works".
One that allows me to sink into a state of ordered *flow*.
Had a chance today to finally review the nuances of @beauhaan's system thanks to his interview with @RobertHaisfield.

The proposed system doesn't *quite* scratch my itch, but it was quite generative for ideas and inspiration.

I'm not building a traditional system. This won't be Luhmann's slipbox. My approach with be unorthodox — but it will work for my brain.

Rather than a "zettelkasten", what I'm *really* looking for is a universal idea management system.

The "non-actionable" companion to GTD.
Read 12 tweets
20 Dec 20
Ever find yourself sitting there, working on something, and an old memory pops into your head?

An isolated moment, nearly forgotten, but brought into your awareness somehow — by some thread, some connection or trigger.
I find these moments amazing. While I might not have actively recalled the memory if I tried — it’s there, just waiting for the right resurfacing trigger.
What’s more amazing still, is having the means to capture them as they naturally arise.

— surprised at their arrival, and able to save them into a growing collection of similar fleeting memories.
Read 7 tweets
19 Dec 20
It feels related to ideas I’ve been considering around simplicity and complexity.
The meme represents the three levels of knowing.

Brilliant.
Read 7 tweets
19 Dec 20
Been hovering around how to structure and organize sets of knowledge.

Building a map — piece by piece.

Today I got some clarity.

Course and lecture design holds some important clues!
A good course and a good lecture have intentional design elements that OREINT the learner.

That build appropriate perspective for the learner, so they can see how the material interacts with the rest of their knowledge or the domain.
There is a map, hidden in the linear structure of many courses.

I want to deconstruct the linearity, to build the multi-dimensional.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!