exciting central banking week ahead!
tomorrow, I will be giving evidence to @LordsEconCom on Bank of England's QE, a set of fascinating questions (and only one hour to discuss them!)
from Wednesday on, a three-day conference on central banking.
Historically, we can trace two regimes of monetary financing, subordinated MF vs shadow MF.
across (a) objectives of intervention, (b) targets, (c) institutional hierarchy, (d) macroeconomic paradigm, and (e) accumulation regime/distribution of political power.
Since 2008, central banks have quietly adopted shadow monetary financing. This is Minsky without Keynes: central banks upgrade tools to evolving financial system – shadow banking or market-based finance– without fiscal authorities reclaiming their Keynesian dominance.
first 5! paras of this piece - Larry Fink, the green man, worried to see climate crisis marks in all the pristine places he flies to in his private jet
look journos of the world, this is how you greenwash Blackrock:
Step 1: set out the scene, the personal detail of the man in charge who really cares.
Step 2: note the fiduciary duties of the financial capitalist, which conflict with the personal beliefs of the green man
Securities traders had the same problem in the 1980s with their repo financing, and the solution was for triparty repo providers to take the market on their balance sheet, basically providing intraday financing unsecured
I wrote about it here - and there is no neat, non systemic solution to time- critical liquidity problems ft.com/content/4da3a0…
apparently, the Gospel according to Morgan Stanley is that we havent had enough neoliberalism for the past 4 decades
if you click on BIS link, it tells you monetary policy, not higher deficits, are associated with wealth inequality.
Incidentally, unconventional monetary policy through which central banks basically rescued banks after they nearly destroyed the global financial system in 2008
new evidence that professors of finance should come out of their monetarist closets not to scream inflation, but to learn about banking ft.com/content/653611…
Quantity Theory of Money is wrong on many levels, but nowhere more so than in assuming banks dont have the power to create money (money supply exogenously controlled by central bank via reserve multiplier).
The monetarist take on coming inflation shock: 1. before Lehman, banks didnt hold excess reserves, but lent them into money market. 2. They could absorb QE-injected reserves without increasing credit. 3. COVID19 reserve creation finally increased bank deposits = inflation
show me something more confusing than accounting capital flows in the balance of payments - this, with due respect, is not helping. cc @jonsindreu@i_aldasoro