1) Jews aren't a race. The notion that Jews ARE a race was literally invented by the precursors to Nazis as a way to make their antisemitism seem more rational and scientific. James Lindsay, self-proclaimed not-prejudiced-guy is recapitulating this excuse for antisemitism.
2) Acceptance of racial stereotypes by average Americans has been DECLINING since 2001. Exactly contrary to what James Lindsay is claiming here, as Critical Race Theory has gained traction in mainstream academia, racial prejudice has decreased.
3) Pursuing equity is not the same thing as saying it's okay to discriminate. What it IS saying is that privileged classes ALREADY have social capital that non-privileged classes lack. "Therefore it's okay to discriminate against whites" is a leap Lindsay is making on his own.
3a) This tells us more about Lindsay than it does about anything else. This isn't a statement of any kind of fear, not a statement of fact. When we say "inequitable systems should be made equitable", what JL hears is "you're gonna take something away from me."
4) The right-wing antisemitic trope of Jews as 'imposters' pretending to be white predates CRT by hundreds of years, as does the left-wing antisemitic trope that Jews are actually super-elites that are ESPECIALLY enemies of the common people.
4a) By attributing these things as being caused by CRT, James Lindsay is both undermining the history of antisemitic abuses and also blaming Jews for causing antisemitism. A double scoop of antisemitism from the guy literally labelling himself as the lone voice against it.
5) It's been DAYS now of Jews telling JL that he is wrong, that he is amplifying damaging tropes about Jews and increasing the danger to Jews, and that his whole premise is, itself, antisemitic.
5a) By refusing to listen to the people he's "defending", JL is positioning himself as the White Savior. Doing so protects and defends white supremacy, both by paternalism (i.e. "You silly Jews, you don't know what you're talking about, listen to me, a Smart White Man")
5b) ... and also by creating an unfalsifiable hypothesis that obviates white Christian America from culpability in perpetuating antisemitism ("We TOLD those Jews what to do, but they just wouldn't listen to us, so all this antisemitism isn't OUR fault, we did our best")
In short:
This graphic is example eleventy-billion from the past several days showing that James Lindsay is, contrary to his self-proclaimed status as Defender of Liberal Ideas, a reactionary who bends over backwards to defend white privilege and white supremacy.
Ugh. This IS a statement of fear, NOT a statement of any kind of fact. Stupid re-phrasing editing to get under 280.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm so tired of the artificial complexity of corporate jobs. 95% of what I do is completely unnecessary, just jumping through hoops and checking boxes instead of actually doing the thing. I want to be, like, an 18th century cobbler or something.
No SWIs, no naming conventions, no gantt charts, no alignment meetings. I buy leather and wood. I cut it into shapes. I make it into shoes. Done. Simple. You want a bigger shoe? No problem, I don't even have to file a P&L on that, I can just cut the leather a little bigger!
Oh, you wanted that shoe today? Too bad, it's going to take me until Thursday. That's how long it takes. That's when you get your shoe. I'm not even gonna request an expedite from some other department just so they can yell at me about following process. Come back on Thursday.
Not that AOC needs me to back her up, but a few points here: 1) Yes, it is in fact an abuse tactic to insist that victims of violence "move on" immediately after the violence with no consequences for the perpetrator of that violence. It's not limited to sexual abuse.
What happened on 1/6 wasn't "legitimate political disagreement". It was an insurrection. Armed people forced their way into the Capitol with the intent of overturning a Democratic election by use of force, and by all accounts at least SOME of them wanted to kill political rivals.
The events of 1/6 are a matter of fact. There is video evidence. There are eyewitnesses, including and *especially* the people who's lives were under threat. Claiming that we can "disagree" about those facts is bonkers. They aren't a matter of opinion.
I want to do a brief deep dive into my frequent assertion that Messianic "Jews" are, in fact, Christians and that Christians cannot be Jews. Every time this comes up a bunch of people - mostly Messianic "Jews" and appropriative Christians - show up to argue with me.
They assert that if a Jew converts to Christianity, they remain a Jew and therefore Jewish Christians are a thing. And *technically* this is true - "once a Jew, always a Jew" is a thing. *Technically* it would be more accurate to say that "Jewish Christians" are apostates.
But while it's more *technically* accurate, it's more misleading. Because unless you know that apostasy is a complicated thing in Judaism, and that there are different classes of apostate, and what the legal restrictions and status are for them, it creates a false impression.
This is, almost certainly, a white supremacist in digital blackface propping up James Lindsey's argument that Jews are causing antisemitism through solidarity with Black people.
Look closely at the profile picture.
The earrings don't match. The right earlobe has some funky image stuff going on. The hair color and texture below the right ear is sharply different than above. There's an undershirt collar on the right, but not the left.
That is an AI generated profile picture.
James Lindsey is a high profile right wing demagogue who pretends to be left wing. He attacks critical race theory - the notion that racism is systemic, not organic, and serves white supremacy - while claiming to be against racism.
Here's the thing about all these calls for "unity" and "moving on" coming from Republicans in the house -
The people who tried to OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT aren't going to "move on". They aren't going to "unify". They are going to keep trying until they succeed in a coup.
Like, forget the fact that I don't particularly want to unify with fascists. The bottom line is that the fascists don't want to unify with me. They want to kill me. That's why they're erecting giant crosses and gallows in front of the capitol.
You don't stop a fascist uprising by making conciliatory noises and suggesting group hugs. You stop a fascist uprising by putting it down, quickly and completely. That means consequences. It means action. It means a resolute refusal to allow them to recruit and organize.
Nope. Not it, not even a little bit.
Insisting on honoring the diet mandated by your beliefs is not weak, it's not fragile, it's not brittle. Refusing to compromise your beliefs under pressure is not being a "snowflake".
Arizona Man is abhorrent. He's a bad person. He committed sedition, and he should face consequences for that. I suspect that he's the worst kind of cultural appropriator, and that he's weaponizing his colonialist "beliefs", and we should absolutely *raze* him for that.
What we should NOT do is throw Jews who keep kosher, Muslims who keep halal, Hindus and Sikhs who are vegetarian under the bus. People have a right to eat according to their beliefs, even when incarcerated, even when they are bad people.