Have you ever realized that the big ideas in Deep Learning are just formulations of very old ideas. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) @goodfellow_ian is just Hegel's dialectic (i.e. thesis and antithesis hence synthesis).
That @DeepMind @demishassabis Alpha* self-play is just the Socratic method. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_…
That skip connections are just a formulation of small-world networks.
That random initialization is just random projections (see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locality-… ).
That Transformers are just C.S.Peirce indexical signs.
That the latent representation of neural networks are just eigendecompositions.
That Q-learning is just the Hamiltonian Jacobi Equations.
That regularizations are just constraints in the method of Lagrange?
That word2vec and language models are just Ludwig Wittgenstein's observation about words and the contexts that they are used.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carlos E. Perez

Carlos E. Perez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IntuitMachine

5 Feb
Thanks to Twitter, I've stumbled upon two must-watch videos that reveal a very important aspect of human minds that we often ignored. The brain's purpose is homeostasis, but what happens when we lose this purpose?
In the first video, Jill Bolte Taylor describes her experience when a stroke damaged the left hemisphere of her brain.
It is important to watch that video before proceeding. In the next video, the author describes his experience with a syndrome described as 'depersonalization'. aeon.co/videos/the-dar…
Read 17 tweets
4 Feb
Nobody really has a good theory of how brains work. Yet we keep hearing people saying that artificial neural networks are not biologically plausible. Who anointed these folks to be the thought police of what is plausible?
A mistake that too many make about artificial neural networks is that they are implementation models (see: Marr's level of explanation). They are not! They are algorithmic models. When you realize this, the question of biological plausibility should be thrown out.
I think Pylyshyn's mapping of the semantic, syntactic and physical to Marr's computational, algorithmic and implementation is just wrong.
Read 12 tweets
3 Feb
Do you think fractals (i.e. iterative and self-similarity) are weird? Well, it isn't as weird as biological iterative processes. medium.com/intuitionmachi…
What's even weirder is that humans have an intuition that something appears organic. What does it actually mean to have an organic design?
Christopher Alexander, an architect, who wrote 'A Pattern Language' that has immensely influenced software development, wrote four books exploring this idea (see: Nature of Order).
Read 16 tweets
2 Feb
Does anyone ever become conscious of how they know how to ride a bicycle? Have you ever tried explaining to a child how to ride a bicycle? The child learns when they overcome their fear rather than understanding your explanation.
We understand how to ride a bike becoming familiar with the interaction. Although a bike is an unnatural thing with wheels, we are still able to mentally make it an extension of our bodies.
We are never really conscious of how we are able to do many things we do in life. If we did, then we could easily specify the rules for a robot to do the same thing. But we don't know how we do things.
Read 18 tweets
2 Feb
I suspect there is a misconception that system 1 (intuitive) is mapped to the right brain and system 2 (deliberate) is mapped to the left brain.
The left brain is livewired to be competent in sequential thought while the right brain is livewired to be competent in parallel thought. One is egocentric and the other is allocentric. One is symbolic and the other is empathic.
One is reductionist and the other is holistic. One is noun-centric and the other is verb-centric. One emphasizes individuality and the other the collective. We can make many analogies about the dichotomy between the two hemispheres of the brain.
Read 15 tweets
1 Feb
Remember folks: The first step in understanding a book begins by purchasing the book! ;-)
At a minimum, the purchase of the a gives one the 'feel' of having read or understood that book.
It's the cost of admission. Everything else is gravy!
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!