I wanted to wait for a few Spanish banks to report b4 sharing something intriguing. By now, you all know that the name of the game in EU banking is that there are simply no new NPLs because everything is deferred (government schemes, payment holidays). But is that always true?
And we all want to know what’s going to happen when reality kicks in. Interestingly, there’s one Spanish bank which apparently decided to stop pretending. If you take a casual look at it, you won’t see anything, because their NPL ratio hasn’t moved much - it's even going down
But that’ only because they did a big sale. The gross NPL entries are far more interesting - those are the real new default/NPL. And we can the first big jump since Covid.
That's a +125% rise over the past 6 quarters average.
Digging in the reports, it’s rather easy to see where this comes from: the construction sector has been hit hard.
But what we're seeing is not necessarily companies becoming bankrupt: it’s the bank choosing to class them as unlikely to pay, a category of NPL. The Stage 3 share in sector specific payment holidays is 16% ! That is way more than other banks.
So is that bank too cautious? Or is the book horrible? Or did they just decide to come clean?
I don’t know for sure, but here’s a clue: this quarter they sent a big thank you card to the ECB and sold a big chunk of Spanish govies to book a 600m profit.
As the saying goes: in terms of loan losses, book what you can afford, not what you should book. It appears that when you can afford more, you book more!
(Btw the bank is Sabadell)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The ESRB & the @EBA_News published their macro scenario for the upcoming bank stress test. What does it look like? Will it finally be credible? And how important will the results be? A thread
Those are important questions, because investors have shrugged the results of the previous tests. Except for distressed banks (e.g. MPS), the results were almost useless – even the EU court of auditors heavily criticized the process.
One criticism often made is that the tests are not severe enough. The comparison with US/UK tests illustrates this (CET1 drawdowns). Of course, there can be good reasons for differences, and u can’t make a stress knowing the outcome you want…but it’s still dubious
A thread on the German data on the efficiency of the AstraZeneca vaccine because I’m reading a lot of VERY bad takes. Is there any kind of statistical significance on the 6.9% efficiency? Is it total crap? It’s not that simple as I’ll try to show.
First of all, forget the absurd “Confidence interval” – it’s useless and based on assumptions that are almost by definition false. So let’s look at this problem differently.
The basic data is this 5829 ppl in the control group, 5807 in the vaccine group, of which 319 and 341 above 65. But the major problem is this: the control group had only case over 65 (101 in total). What is the implication of this surprising number?
Paul has a funny question, so let's look at the epic short squeezes and artificial market cap created. You're in for a few surprises. 1st, we're all talking about GameStop.
Chart is for Frankfurt trading. Mkt Cap 15bn€, so +14.7bn€ since the meteoric rise.
Some of you probably remember the epic Volskwagen short squeeze created by Porsche. Full story there ft.com/content/0a58b6…
Nice chart, hey ! Price at 714€, that's 269bn€ created ! WOW.
But there is BETTER
And now we turn to my favorite babies, EU banks. Meet Bankia: it was put into "resolution" and hybrids converted 2 equity b4 the IPO. For some reason there was a massive short squeeze before hybrids could sell.
From 140 to 1.3 that's 428bn€ of paper money!
But there's BETTER
Cyprus is truly a fascinating country. Have you heard of the ESTIA scheme? What is happening there is extraordinary. A quick thread.
The general idea of the scheme is great! The purpose is "to deliver a socially acceptable and financially sustainable restructuring solution to vulnerable borrowers who have mortgaged their primary residence".
Indeed, that sounds like a great idea. But how ?
Very straightforward.
"The government subsidizes part of the repayment instalments by 1/3 of the restructured loan."
It took me a while to write this thread about the ECB’s Financial Stability Review, but that is because (thanks to @michaelsteen and his great team), I got clarifications on some important points.
A lot has been said already, so I’ll try to focus on items which are not obvious.
On the macro front, I will just mention this chart, which looks at the phase-out of measures I believe are the most important for GDP/Banks: in the periphery Spain looks better than Italy, in Core, Germany is stronger.
But there are dozens of other interesting charts in the report, there is just no point reproducing them here. Let’s look at banks, now.