One thing I love to do with Dan's monthly dynasty value charts is track the change in my players' values over time. Most of my roster management decisions are aimed at making sure that number keeps going up. If I succeed, I'm going to win a lot of championships as a byproduct!
Some might protest that value isn't points. True! But if value doesn't eventually translate into points, it goes down and you've failed your "keep going up" goal.
Over long timelines it's impossible for your roster to keep getting more valuable without resulting in lots of wins.
I'd also argue that approaching dynasty with the mindset that value is the primary target and wins are a lagging indicator of your success in hitting that target results in healthier, more competitive teams than just chasing wins outright.
On the margins things can change. If Phillip Rivers is your only QB and you are in the playoffs don't cut him just because he's going to go to zero. Small value losses are an acceptable and even normal part of doing business. At some point, you have to consider wins qua wins.
Indeed, month-over-month value increases typically look like that. A lot of very small value losses offset by a couple very large value gains.
I can illustrate with one of my teams, since I just compared player value in the February charts to player value in the December charts.
QB Net: -2
RB Net: +23
WR Net: -2
TE Net: -1
Total Net: +18
A huge gain from Akers, a large gain from Aiyuk, and decent gains from Gus Edwards and J.D. McKissic deep down by RB depth chart essentially offset a bunch of tiny drops here and there. Overall a good couple months for my dynasty team.
I use @Hindery's value charts for this because his process is most similar to my own of anyone else's I've seen, and because his values are quantified with a lot of detail. But in theory you can use any source of player value (e.g. ADP) and if numbers go up, wins will follow.
(Another reason I use Hindery's charts is because I can test myself against him. I can try to pick out mispriced assets on his chart and monthly gains and losses are a way to keep score. If I'm right, numbers go up. If I'm wrong, numbers go down. Gotta keep myself sharp.)
Anyway, if you prefer these thoughts in article form, I wrote back in 2015 about managing my team to maximize value and let the wins follow.
So the two that immediately come to mind are Unitas / Berry / Moore and Manning / Harrison / Wayne. The first trio especially because Moore was just so versatile.
But as a dark horse pick, how about Daryle Lamonica / Fred Biletnikoff / Warren Wells?
You’re probably familiar with Hall of Famer Biletnikoff. And Lamonica, “the Mad Bomber”, was in many ways the proto-Mahomes. Just zero football conscience, never saw a deep window he wasn’t going to try to fit a ball into. Paired with an uncanny ability to elude pressure.
Wells would be the relative unknown in this group.
In 1969, he led the AFL in receiving yards with 1260 and in receiving TDs with 14 (in 14 games, remember).
He only caught 47 passes that year. That’s 26.8 yards per reception.
Do you just really need a guy in your corner right now? Because I can totally be your guy in the corner. My mentions are always open. If you feel embarrassed, my DMs are open, too. Nobody in there but me.
I might not be able to help. But it certainly can't hurt.
Standing offer.
I've had some offer to chip in a few bucks for help. I appreciate the sentiment, but all help is free. I help because I want to help!
Moreover, my family has been doing fine. But many others have not. If you do feel moved to give, here's a worthy cause: chicagohomeless.org
Also: I love the English language. I love words. I use a lot of them. (You might have noticed.) I'm not trying to sound like a snob or anything, I just really like words!
Five and a half years ago, I live-tweeted a dynasty rankings update. It was fun, and it's cool to have a historical archive of my thought process at the time. I think it holds up pretty well.
I find myself with 30 minutes to kill and kind of wanted to hammer out my WR rankings. Stream-of-consciousness style. Don't know how deep I'll go but I think the position is interesting and talking it out will be clarifying.
Feel free to mute me in advance.
WR1 - DK Metcalf
WR2 - AJ Brown
Easiest calls. I could be tempted to go contrarian with Brown over Metcalf, but Metcalf's higher market value gives you a lot more flexibility if you decide to trade one for a king's ransom.
Either way: crazy young, crazy good, super productive.
I have fantasy value for every player back to 1985. McCaffrey has the most fantasy value of any running back through age 23.
Among retired players, 11 of the top 12 had more fantasy value *AFTER* age 23. Usually much more. I don't think his value is even half-gone yet.
(The lone exception was Clinton Portis, who added 472 points over a waiver-wire replacement through age 23, then 412 points over a waiver-wire replacement after.)
Not worried about CMC. Was really painful to part with him. The advantage he gives even over the 2nd/3rd best players at the position cannot be overstated. It’s virtually irreplaceable.
Some aspects of the deal were unique to my team. I viewed it as CMC for Swift and Higgins, plus Evans for the 1st/3rd as juice to get the deal done.
My other WRs are now AJBrown, Thomas, McLaurin, Higgins, Golladay, Aiyuk, and Robby Anderson, so Evans was more expendable.
Ideally, players should either be (A) starting for you or (B) young. Evans was neither. (Despite what the dynasty community would have you believe, 27 is not old. But it’s not young, either.)
So I was content to get value for him, even at a slight loss.
I'm possibly an insane person, but I just traded Christian McCaffrey and Mike Evans for D'Andre Swift, Tee Higgins, and a late 1st and 3rd.
Do with this information what you will.
Digging more into this deal.
The other team is not going all-in on chasing a championship. In fact, I am the team with the better title odds (2nd-best in the league right now). And losing McCaffrey noticeably hurts them.
I've written before about how I don't do "win-now" deals. I don't sacrifice value for a few percentage point bump in current-year championship odds.
This is the corollary. I *WILL* sacrifice a few percentage points in championship odds if I feel I'm getting value for them!