Good morning. The Senate trial begins today, and you'll have a lot of opportunities for #DetectingDeception. You've been warming up for months, but here are a few last-minute tips.
2/ You won't find the deceptions as much in things people say in the trial as you will in things people say about the trial in news and on social media. There are consequences for being deceptive in legal proceedings, but there may not be for doing it elsewhere.
3/ The incentives are actually pretty high to try to shape the shape the story outside of the trial. As I understand it, impeachment is a political process, which means the outcome may be a mix of what's right and what's helpful politically for some.
4/ That means that whatever the public (voters) *think* about the evidence matters a lot to what happens. So public figures are going to be working overtime to tell you what to think. Weak evidence could mean more efforts to deceive.
5/ I tend to train with team truth, so I think a FAIR trial is the most important thing. Real evidence, presented fairly and considered without bias to make the best decision. You can play a role through what you choose to share.
6/ Look out for inflammatory verbs. Describing people's statements as "drags," "destroys," "claps back at," "torches," and the like is a pretty good sign that this is someone's biased opinion, hidden in emotional language to make you want to share it. Don't be a patsy.
7/ If you need to share misinformation, use a screenshot, not a re-share and remember the truth sandwich:

This falsely said thing

Is wrong because

Thus, it's a wrong statement.
8/ Remember to join with people in your life to be accountable for thinking carefully about the things you are hearing.

Who said this?

Why would they say this to this audience in this way?

Is there any good proof offered?
9/ Finally, if you want to review some of the common deceptions that have been in the news the last 6 months, the hashtag #DetectingDeception has many examples.
10/ Shady language from folks trying to manipulate you isn't going away. Bonus points for checking out my book that teaches you how to spot it and what to do about it. bit.ly/DetectingDecep…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Amanda Sturgill

Dr. Amanda Sturgill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrSturg

28 Jan
Off to teach today - a few hours in a de-densified classroom with masked students. Based on news reports, planning on double mask on me, but spent some time looking for official guidance from a health department and 🦗. This seems troublesome. #PartyLikeAProfessor
2/ I mean, look at this. One Google search for double masks for #COVID19 yields all this conflicting advice.
3/ Which leads to...unhelpful... takes like this.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jan
#WednesdayWisdom There has been a lot of calling media outlets #FakeNews over the last several years, and I thought this chart was interesting (Expand to see recent trends). #DetectingDeception Image
2/ It's been pretty evident that calling things #FakeNews was a way to avoid stories that the name-caller just didn't like. That's deceptive of course. Two ways you might notice this.
3/ First, is the #FakeNews accusation only used when it is bad things about the accuser? Second, does the accuser proudly cite the very same source when the story is complimentary?
Read 5 tweets
24 Jan
This is an interesting summation from interviews with journalists covering taxi online cultures. Several interesting ideas including "to assess newsworthiness, one must also assess what weapons the story would hand to its audiences." datasociety.net/wp-content/upl…
2/ "Further, the choice
to engage with a false story – even in the effort to refute it – aligns with the interests of the manipulators, who see any form of amplification as a victory."
3/ Person-attacks... stories are popular and get clicks. "...stories should keep the story specific to the communities affected, focus on the impact of an attack, minimize sensationalist language and headlines, and reduce antihero framings of the perpetrator"
Read 6 tweets
23 Jan
Today in #DetectingDeception is ... this. It's a good example of why reading past the tweet or headline is important, and also a good example of deceptive distraction.
2/ There's a full story, which you can read here. He basically went on, beyond the headline, to say that there are a variety of causes that could be examined. huffpost.com/entry/kevin-mc…
3/ That's probably true, but also beside the point. I think about it this way: I commute to work on an interstate. Very few people drive the speed limit of 65. I'd guess an average 75, with some folks going 90 or more. If everyone is too fast, is it wrong to pull anyone?
Read 5 tweets
15 Jan
Today in #DetectingDeception is the false comparison. I've seen this graphic a few places on social media and I don't know if it's authentic, but for this discussion, that doesn't really matter. Here's why something like this would have issues.
2/ When you look at information, there are a few relevant questions you might ask:

Is it true?

Is it in context?

Is it relevant?
3/ I started by looking at the source. There IS a Major Cities Chiefs Association, and they did produce a report on last summer's protests you can find on their website. majorcitieschiefs.com
Read 12 tweets
13 Jan
Recent/current/future events in the U.S. got you feeling helpless? Here's one thing you can do today, right from where you are, to help. #FightFakeNews #DetectingDeception
2/ When people feel unsure, they try to get information to understand the situation. That's human nature. In a swirl of toxic lies and deceptions, it's very risky. Everyone needs to check themselves before they believe or repeat.
3/ Deplatforming people and information linked to violence is a good decision, but also a dangerous one. It is leading people to believe that they have to go further to find trusted sources with secret knowledge.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!