Sir,
New Zealand has population less than Ahmedabad and one fourth of New Delhi. Still New Zealand has one whole vote in UNGA. Same true for Scandinavian Countries. They don't have much scope for administration, governance and growth.
New Zealand has population less than Ahmedabad and one fourth of New Delhi. Still New Zealand has one whole vote in UNGA. Same true for Scandinavian Countries. They don't have much scope for administration, governance and growth.
https://twitter.com/Banker_Sadhu/status/1359153919641989122
In fact, in many developed countries at the seat of Mayor, they have elected some dog or cat, as there is no real work there. These countries practically run themselves. This gives them scope for becoming mediator for the issues in other countries.
In case of LTTE and Sri Lanka issue, it was Norway which became mediator. In case of Iran and US, Germany became mediator. Norway actually tried to meddle many times in Kashmir issue.
In case of Myanmar, because of influence of China, India has very complex relations. One wrong move can deteriorate India-China relations for many decades. There is no such constraint with New Zealand. Therefore we shouldn't compare India and New Zealand here.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
