So, yesterday came news of two brutal massacres by Pakistan, a State Sponsor of Terror(FATF Grey Listed) - one in Islamabad itself where teachers who gathered before Parliament to ask why their promised pay hike is not implemented.
They were attacked with, of all things, expired tear gas shells. Reports cite 53 deaths. The second one is from Kohlu where the government attacked the town of Kohlu with helicopter gunships. There were atleast six deaths, but numbers are to be ascertained.
Where is @UNPeacekeeping? Where is @UNHumanRights? Where is @FATFNews? Where are all those vultures who bleat and bray for much smaller incidents? When a state starts massacring innocents with impunity for decades, what exactly are all these people doing?
So, what is the problem with Sri Lanka? First of all, I will give you three maps. The first one is the demographic map of Sri Lanka, the second one is the map of Prabhakaran's Tamil Eelam. The third is religions in Sri Lanka.
A near 100% match in all three images. So, what's the inference? Sinhalese = Buddhists and Tamils = Hindus. So, Tamils are not us. That's the root cause of every problem Sri Lanka has. It's not that Sri Lanka is isolated from Tamil Country. For millenia, people moved in either
direction. Koneshwaram and the associated Shankari Shaktipeetham are some of the greatest Hindu temples. The last Kandy Nayak was not a Sinhalese and not even a Tamil - he is a Telugu. That closely knit they were. All problems started when the British opened the State Council
Europe was always treated to be the central pivot for the world history but the reality is, outside Roman Empire, European History before Colonialism was not even worth mentioning. Let me give you an example. How did Europe fare before the Mongols?
The whole Mongol enterprise in Europe can be divided into just four critical battles -
Battle of Kalka River, 1223
Siege of Kolomna, 1238
Battle of Mohi 1241
Battle of Legnica 1241
After the Cumans were destroyed, they fled into Kievan Rus. A combined Russian force under the personal control of Grand Prince Mstislav of Kiev and comprising units of Cumans, Kiev, Galich, Chemingov and others(18 Princes in total) blocked the Mongols on Dneiper River.
So, as like everything else, we were taught lies about Mahant Narain Das(the old man in the image) and Saka Nankana, then.
What we were told? He and his Pathan mercenaries attacked the Akalis who marched on Nankana and massacred them on Feb 20 1921. What was the trigger? Do we know?
What are the charges of the Akalis? Appropriation. Any proofs? We don't know. But, one thing is certain. Nankana's revenue is 5 lakhs and everyone would want that. But, more importantly, he refused to become Keshdhari.
How different is this from what Bhindrawale and his goons did? A near 100% match.
Even this one. Sikhs have forgotten the excesses of Bhindrawale and his goons because non-Sikhs "desecrated" Harmandir Sahib. Are they in a mood to check why it was Harmandir Sahib and not Nanded Sharif?
Even this. Either that's how they are or someone studied Akali Movement before unleashing Bhindrawale on the world.