So, yesterday came news of two brutal massacres by Pakistan, a State Sponsor of Terror(FATF Grey Listed) - one in Islamabad itself where teachers who gathered before Parliament to ask why their promised pay hike is not implemented. 
They were attacked with, of all things, expired tear gas shells. Reports cite 53 deaths. The second one is from Kohlu where the government attacked the town of Kohlu with helicopter gunships. There were atleast six deaths, but numbers are to be ascertained.
Where is @UNPeacekeeping? Where is @UNHumanRights? Where is @FATFNews? Where are all those vultures who bleat and bray for much smaller incidents? When a state starts massacring innocents with impunity for decades, what exactly are all these people doing?
Even Milosevic and Rajapaksa were smaller fry before what Pakistan is doing. All these years, not one voice is raised against the excesses of Pakistani state, one of the very few State Sponsors of Terror(FATF Grey Listed) we have today.
I will ask the world two things
1. Why is Pakistan given a blank cheque in spite of the fact that it is one of the most brutal regimes post World War II and is known to harbour some of the world's dreaded terrorists?
1. Why is Pakistan given a blank cheque in spite of the fact that it is one of the most brutal regimes post World War II and is known to harbour some of the world's dreaded terrorists?
2. If Pakistani activities are not considered as excesses, care to explain why the likes of India which are mere sheep before Pakistan are expected to listen to your words?
When Pakistan has impunity to murder its citizens for no reason, India has every right to arrest(not even kill) all those who attacked its sovereignty. You have no moral right to question whatsoever.
Remember how Milosevic was treated. Why aren't we doing the same with Bajwa and Imran Khan? When we fully know the root cause of all problems is Punjabi imperialism over occupied lands like Sind and Balochistan and the solution is separation of these territories from Pakistan
either as independent countries or rule by an international peacekeeping force till a semblance of sanity is established, why are we sticking to one-Pakistan policy? As what King Edward said in Braveheart, "The Problem with Scotland is it is full of Scots", do we want a repeat?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
