Sexism in the Academy: An excellent, detailed account of how male dominance in the academy and scholarship is sustained (2019). nplusonemag.com/issue-34/essay… via @nplusonemag 1/15
Women now comprise a bit over half of undergrad students but the proportions decline at every stage of the academic hierarchy “While there were significant gains during much of the 20th century, feminist progress in the academy has slowed and may have already come to a halt” 2/15
Academic ranks are still male-dominated. Banal sexist practices, not ugly misogyny, explain most of the problem. “This durable, unjust structure largely depends on the attitudes and practices of three social groups: male scholars, male students, and male romantic partners.” 3/15
Male candidates are rated more highly than female. Women’s competence doubted, and often asked to ‘prove it again’. Women are expected to work harder than men for the same results, e.g. in publication. 4/15
Women risk receiving much less credit than men for work they have done, or it’s even attributed by others to men. Men more likely than women to receive grants, and receive more money. Men are more likely to cite men than women. 5/
Female scholars’ progress is constrained by sexual harassment. While men’s SH can benefit the sexual harassers’ careers and professional success, and that of other men, by systematically undermining women. hugeog.com/wp-content/upl… 6/15
“Women’s attempts to secure tenured positions in the academy are undermined by secretive informal networks that secure jobs for their members.” 7/15
The 3 mechanisms for instituting academic patriarchy discussed so far..: 1. men’s preference for men (whether for students, citations, or granting tenure); 2. skepticism about women’s abilities; 3. harassment. 8/15
A fourth cateogry of sexist practice is ‘vanity’. Example of self-citation. Male scholars twice as likely as female to cite his own work. Intensifies the gender gap in citation and impact. 9/15
“Male undergraduates demonstrate a sharp bias against both their female peers and female instructors”. “male students overwhelmingly favor male instructors over female ones”. Influence of student evaluations on career. 10/15
Also the expectation that female teachers will do more ‘mothering’ (which leaves less time for research). And more likely to be evaluated in terms of preparation, versus charisma and knowledge (that takes less preparation). 11/15
Women’s careers are often sabotaged by their own husbands and partners. Male scholars are much more likely to have a spouse stay at home and less likely to face the “two-body problem”. And this problem typically is decided in men’s favour. 12/15
Academic husbands are more likely than academic wives to see their own careers as coming first, to expect their spouse to make career sacrifices to help them. Having children slows down women’s careers but not men’s. 13/15
“While structured inequality produces aggregate effects, it is essential to remember that it simultaneously causes intensely individual suffering. […] like all scholars, women eschew potential riches to seek their intellectual fortune, motivated by a passion to learn and teach.
That so many are forced to relinquish this goal because of condescending or lewd supervisors, selfish spouses, smug students, and prejudiced hiring committees is in every case a personal tragedy of an unfulfilled life.” 15/15
PS. Apologies for the three or so typos in these tweets. Clearly I needed more coffee.
There's a literature on how women can survive and thrive in academia, and overlapping with this, on feminist advocacy and gender equality work in universities. I've compiled some of this, in the last section of xyonline.net/books/bibliogr…. Not my area, and additions are welcome.
Note too the two pieces on what male academics can do I tweeted earlier today: 1) Don’t be that dude: tenureshewrote.wordpress.com/2013/09/26/don… @TenureSheWrote; 2) Male academics: Ten Things You Can Do Now to Improve the Climate for Women in Your Department: advance.cc.lehigh.edu/sites/advance.…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Michael Flood

Dr Michael Flood Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MichaelGLFlood

30 Nov 20
Men Have No Friends and Women Bear the Burden. The idea that feelings are a "female thing" has left a generation of straight men stranded on emotionally-stunted island, unable to forge intimate relationships with other men. Women pay the price. harpersbazaar.com/culture/featur…
The key takeaways from this piece: 1/3: 1) Men are socialised to avoid emotional expression. 2) Men thus tend to have weaker, less intimate friendships than women. 3) As a result, heterosexual men often try to get all their emotional needs met by their female intimate partners.
2/3 4) This is bad for men. Limits their sources of support, makes them more vulnerable e.g. if separation. 5) And it’s bad for women: is a burden, have to do all the emotional labour.
Read 4 tweets
13 Oct 20
Men, gender, and privilege 1/6: Privilege is “systematically conferred advantages individuals enjoy by virtue of their membership in dominant groups”. Male privilege is the flipside of female disadvantage. xyonline.net/content/undoin… Image
Men, gender, and privilege 2/6: Privilege often is invisible to those who receive it. So while some men acknowledge that women are disadvantaged, they are less willing to recognise that they are correspondingly privileged. xyonline.net/content/undoin…
Men, gender, and privilege 3/6: Privilege is normalised. Privileged lives become the dominant norm. The dominant group’s characteristics become the basis for measuring success. Men are seen as “normal”, the norm is unmarked, and men are seen as representative of all humanity
Read 6 tweets
27 Sep 20
PhD supervisors as co-authors of their students' work: PhD supervisors should only be named as co-authors if they have made a *direct and significant* contribution to the publication. Supervision, feedback, or the provision of funding *do not* justify inclusion as an author 1/9
An author is “an individual who has made a significant intellectual contribution to the study” (Elsevier). Authorship "should be limited to those individuals who have contributed in a meaningful and substantive way to its intellectual content.” (Yale Office of the Provost) 2/9
Guidelines on authorship are very clear. For example, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends authorship be based on 4 criteria. All should meet all 4 criteria, and all who meet the 4 should be identified as authors. icmje.org/recommendation… 3/9 Image
Read 12 tweets
26 Sep 20
Debates over trans, sex, and gender 1/23: This journal article spells out feminist concerns over recent legal proposals with regard to trans people. A detailed, scholarly expression of feminist, ‘gender critical’ assessment of common arguments. In full: xyonline.net/sites/xyonline… Image
The proposed Equality Act “fails to strike a balance between the rights, needs, and interests of two marginalized (and overlapping) groups — trans people and females — and instead prioritizes the demands of trans people over the hard-won rights of female people.” 2/23
The proposed Equality Act “would allow *any* male at *any* time to claim access to female-only spaces or provisions on the basis of a gender identity claim”, extending this both to transwomen and to predatory or opportunist males 3/23
Read 24 tweets
24 Sep 20
Shore School scandal: More thoughts. The planned tasks for the Year 12 boys’ ‘muck-up day’ included potential sexual assaults and sexual humiliations of girls and women. Coercive and deceptive behaviour, that would cause real harm. 1/8
What’s the explanation? Hypermasculine and sexist peer cultures. Including a sense of entitlement and a ‘born to rule’ mentality. Tight group loyalties and the exclusion of others. Codes of silence and cover-up. 2/8
Sexist, harassing, and sexual coercive behaviour also has been visible in other all-male or male-dominated contexts: other boys’ schools, military university, sporting codes, all-male residential campus colleges, and workplaces. This stuff isn't 'bad apples', it's cultural. 3/8
Read 8 tweets
24 Sep 20
COVID-19 is disproportionately devastating minority communities, in Britain and elsewhere. The pandemic is exposing broader inequalities, systemic injustice and official denial. Gary Younge. newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20… 1/5
COVID-19’s unequal impact: Because minority communities are more likely to be poor, and poor people are more likely to be vulnerable. To live in deprived neighbourhoods and to experience higher unemployment, higher poverty, lower incomes, and overcrowding than white people 2/5
These groups *do not* have culture or genetics in common. But they *do* share a common experience of povery, low pay and poor housing – and all the things that go with that, including ill health – that make them susceptible to coronavirus. And concentrations in risky jobs. 3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!