Huntley going over specific groups that are being tapped to help inform the public engagement process, i.e. how to "frame the conversation" and what channels to use to reach people.
So far: Latinx, youth and Black residents.
We don't have as big of a network in that last demographic, Huntley says, "but I think it's really important. We all recognize the Black community in particular has a unique experience with policing. ....
Particularly given the historic roots of policing, Huntley says, "It's critically important to lift those voices in this process."
Huntley: We're not going to ask people multiple-choice questions or have them rank priorities. We really want to have more of an open-ended conversation. "I think we really need to explore the concept of safety."
"Safety means different things to different people," Huntley says.
People will be asked to describe "your ideal encounter" with an officer in various scenarios: As a victim, as a suspect and as a witness.
Young: Last night, I spent a little bit of time ... listening to the Somos Boulder podcast.
Suggests that and KGNU as channels for engagement. Also "good ol' fashioned paper" like flyers. (Fliers?)
Young also suggest a "place-based approach."
Huntley: We are ID'ing neighborhoods that might have specific challenges with crime or other interactions with police, etc.
Brockett: This process plan is very "thorough. ... I think this will be a successful outreach" effort.
Next: Taxes (kind of). It's mostly about the city's many, many unfunded capital projects ($300M+ worth) and how to pay for them. Presentation here: www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/CCS_Capit…
But taxes come in bc the Community, Culture, Safety Tax —
approved in 2014, extended in 2017 — is expiring this year. Staff recommending put another extension on the ballot, for a minimum of 10 years.
A little background:
The CCS has its roots in the 2011 Capital Investment Strategy, which ID’d $700M in unfunded needs
First initiative to close the gap was $49M Capital Improvement Bond for 100 projects.
It's Tuesday in #Boulder. You know what that means.... CITY COUNCIL NIGHT!
Maybe that was an oversell. Let's try again: It's city council night in #Boulder.
Tonight is a study session, which is usually pretty snooze-fest. BUT the topics are interesting: Taxes and policing — specifically, a "re-imagining" of Boulder Police Dept. boulderbeat.news/2021/02/08/bou…
That's it for the council meeting. Sorry I kinda zoned out on the last couple of issues (city manager search update and city attorney search). I wish I could say it doesn't matter what Nagle said, but it does. It fucking hurts.
I will get over it because I know I did my job. But I am not going to be blamed for her saying something uninformed, hurtful and offensive.
It is my job to report what elected officials say — and unguarded moments offer just as much truth (often more) than what they say when they know people are watching.
I did what I do every single Tuesday. This particular Tuesday, the only thing new was what she said.
Carr: We put this up for a test Jan. 22. "As anybody who's done any software work knows, you can test and test. We did. You can't discover everything."
UGH, looking the least forward to this. Feels like we're just going through the motions, since OSBT already turned it down. Very unlikely council will do different.