Thread by @MediaWatchSwe

@ChristerJanson Press Manager @Folkhalsomynd has noticed the "half-truths" and "outbursts" by @MediaWatchSwe. Quite astounding considering their gaslighting, misleading information, and the failure to accept and acknowledge the most meritorious scientific evidence out there.

He states the following further highlighting how @Folkhalsomynd is so out of touch with the reality in Sweden. We have appeared on many international news outlets, with MEWAS mentioned. Some of Sweden`s finest and brightest have been vilified, subjected to smear campaigns, and

ostracized for criticizing @Folkhalsomynd and the Govt. We were so well hidden they could find us! @SverigeRadio then states that we declined a taped interview but if you look at the email sent by @UlrikaBjorksten we were given the choice of a taped recording or in writing.

@ChristerJanson could you please comment on the report that @MediaWatchSwe has been consistently writing to @Folkhalsomynd: that has been cited by experts and the government comparing the opening of schools in 🇸🇪 and closures in 🇫🇮 that might have influenced policy-makers around

the world. The report is misleading and non-peer-reviewed but was reported on by @Reuters. The report concludes that school openings were not an issue during the pandemic with little evidence of transmission of the virus among school children in both Sweden and Finland.

But what the text fails to mention is
🆘50 children in #Sweden contracted MIS-C while that figure was Zero in #Finland.
🆘14 patients within this age group(1–19) ended up in ICU in 🇸🇪 compared to only 1 in 🇫🇮, which corresponds to a ratio of 7 to 1 when comparing per capita rates

For a report cited by so many 🇸🇪 officials is it not concerning that it gained wide coverage? When we finally got a response from an Epidemiologist @Folkhalsomynd he stated that

"It was just a quick situation report, and nothing more"
Why was it then cited @ChristerJanson?