One interesting angle on $EVO is the dividend-growth story that is quickly emerging.
Mgmt. has a policy that ~50% of consolidated net profit be returned as an annual dividend.
$EVO is now yielding .67%, which doesn't sound to appealing as a dividend play.
However, most dividend paying companies aren't near-monopolies growing 53% YoY with significant operating leverage and a variable dividend policy tied directly to net profit growth
Net profit grew 90% in 2020 (the dividend grew "only" 62% because of dilution mainly from the NetEnt acquisition)
There likely isn't another NetEnt-sized acquisition this year, and as $EVO grows, the dilutive effects of small M&A will decrease substantially
By the end of FY 2022, the dividend should be set at ~1.5 EUR/share or $1.82 USD, which using today's price = a 1.5% yield. By the end of FY 2024, the yield will almost certainly be > 2%.
All of the above is based on consensus numbers which $EVO has a history of beating.
The stability provided by the dividend policy is a huge benefit in these calculations.
Dilution could hurt the yield in the short-term, but in ~5 years $EVO could have the rare combination of being a very high-growth, high-yield holding for current shareholders.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Credit to @AltaFoxCapital for the excerpt below, but when you combine $EVO / $EVVTY's stranglehold (via partnerships) on the US iGaming market with % take-rate based contracts, $EVO is by far the best positioned to capture the US iGaming growth with little incremental spend
Reached out to $TRIT IR and they said the 1/18 investor presentation is the same slide deck used at the Northland SPAC Conference
I compared this deck to an old one from Aug. 2020 and the notable differences are below
1) The focus on the new presentation is on Kratos' value proposition and Triterras growth strategy while their older presentation focused on explaining what trade finance was and the niche Triterras sought to fill within the industry
1 cont.) The new deck describes a much more polished company vs. the old deck reading as a proof of concept.
2) The new deck breaks the business down into 3 ecosystems (transaction, financial, and delivery) which each house certain Kratos modules
40.7M YTD revenue (17M in Q3)
24.2M YTD net income (10M in Q3)
Run-rate revenue per trader 1.03M Q3 vs. 750k Q2 (37% increase)
Q3 traders 66 vs. 61 in Q2 (8.2% increase QoQ)
The 66 traders could have been a much larger number but was limited by internal bandwidth. Significant senior exec. hiring initiative is ongoing, touching Europe, North America, and Dubai (already hired).
Recruiting a Chief Revenue Officer
171.6M in cash on hand as of 11/30. Open to accretive M&A to assist organic growth
Koneru will be buying shares when the trading window opens
Slightly skewed to the bulls side but Rhodium's bad trade not being handled on Kratos is very important news because it validates $TRIT's product-market fit.
I don't think Rhodium not routing all its trades through Kratos is a reason there couldn't be fraud here, as any knowledgable bad actor would think to disguise the scheme using other platforms
The counterpoint about Koneru leaving Rhodium is strong, but the concerning trend is that's twice now where Koneru (and Maurer with Exxova + not buying Rhodium) has left a company and it has imploded. That's the true concern.