The S&P500 and CPC are both “superintelligences,” but quite different in their goal seek.

Let’s study the world’s two largest systems in terms of how they aggregate, and direct the efforts of, hundreds of millions of humans into their state-corporate systems.
2. First, what’s a superintelligence? “A superintelligence is a hypothetical agent that possesses intelligence far surpassing that of the most gifted human minds”—Wikipedia. But contrary to this definition, not hypothetical...
3. S&P500: The modern corporation is a legal entity which arranges humans in a hierarchical structure, for the pursuit of a narrow mathematical algorithm—maximize short-term investor return. Google for example, has 135K workers all focused on this goal.
4. And every large American corporation is programmed with this same goal seek. Next, organize the 500 largest corporations by market cap into a macro-entity which is the S&P500 stock index. This total entity has 25 million employees, with geniuses borrowed from all countries.
5. The massive size and intelligence of this networked entity creates a gravity which pulls government into its orbit. And so, corporate & state employees merge into a superintelligence serving an idiot master (the afore mentioned narrow algo).
6. This is why despite being terrifyingly intelligent, the system produces what sometimes seem retarded self-destructive long-term choices (cannibalizing its own people, selling out itself, destroying the planet, etc).
7. A superintelligence *could* calculate long-term rational game, unless you specifically wrote the algo *not* to do so (which is what happened in the 70s with neoliberalism/Friedmanism).
8. CPC: The ruling party is 90 million people that were selected from the nation’s 1.5 billion; from a population which has the highest avg IQ on the planet. Each year nearly a million people take the civil service exam, with a pass rate of approx 1.5%.
9. From all accounts it’s a really bad-ass IQ test. And that’s only the beginning, with a lifelong road of then putting those quantified smarts to work to generate real-world governing successes (losers are culled).
10. Understanding this, that we’re talking about the largest governmental meritocracy that has ever existed which selects for intelligence and results, it’s not hard to understand the CPC as a superintelligence.
11. And because it maintains 51% ownership in some of the large corporations (SOEs), it is industry that is pulled into the orbit of government, not vice versa. We could say this conglomerate entity has a “programming” of sorts, to first and foremost protect Chinese sovereignty,
12. and then with borders secured engage in various public projects which benefit the people (poverty elimination, infrastructure, reestablishing the ancient trade routes, etc), and thru this it can stay in power.
13. But this programming is flexible; in the CPC system there are human masters at the top, not a rigid legal algorithm, so the entity *can* reprogram itself to different goals as circumstances change.
14. Now, once we have this toy model we can forecast outcomes a lot better than thru delusional beliefs about these systems (fed by corporate media, the first system).

Obviously these systems would theoretically output different choices, and we can see that is what’s happening.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sol 太阳 쏠

Sol 太阳 쏠 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Solzi_Sez

10 Feb
Western “defending myself” gun people can’t comprehend societies that 1) don’t have guns, 2) have impenetrable gated towers with CCTV and steels door, 3) are filled with civilized Confucian people; rarely a murder.

I can’t even *imagine* his scenario...
How would anyone break into my residence? It’s essentially impossible.

And if they did, how would they get out with my stuff, with CCTV watching?

And if I were there, why would I need to do/say anything? They would just see someone is there and run away.

Different worlds.
Now he switches to “but Tiananmen Square!!” 😂
Read 4 tweets
14 Dec 20
This is it—the core social problem of the Anglosphere this century—there is a deep cultural attitude in the colonies, who still see themselves as superior rulers of the world.
Other civilizations don’t exist, in the mind of the West. Or at least they shouldn’t exist.

All the convoluted reasons given by them for why they hate China, are really just rage that a different civilization still exists.

Yes, the bigotry goes that deep. /2
Check the actual definition of this word, which Westerners often use incorrectly (“racist”). This is the West, in a word...

BIGOTED: having or revealing an obstinate belief in the *superiority* of one’s own opinions and prejudiced *intolerance* of the opinions of others. /3
Read 5 tweets
13 Dec 20
POST-TRUTH ERA—WHY WEST, NOT EAST?

Q: How is it that America finds itself ripped apart by postmodernism (i.e. subjectivism / post-truth era), yet East Asia remains sanely grounded in reality?

Cc: @SRCHicks @ConceptualJames @jordanbpeterson @BryanVanNorden @StatesWarring
Background: public intellectuals in the West have been addressing postmodernism (Stephen Hicks, Jordan Peterson, James Lindsay, etc), yet they find themselves going over the same tired old philosophic ground and not really getting to root cause. /2
Apparently it hasn’t yet occurred to them that Western thinking might not be able to solve this Western problem, if it was that thinking itself which created the problem. 💡/3
Read 12 tweets
1 Dec 20
The #Anglosphere, in the 21st century.

It all goes back to the British Empire. It set up colonies, it set global markets rules, and it assumed itself king of this system forever. But...

...now Anglo exceptionalism faces an existential crisis.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglosphe… Image
Think about it, the UK set up these colonies. But any colony in Asia (e.g. Australia) is dependent on Asia, period.

There's no way around geography. Australia is in China's orbit. But how can the white-culture superiority complex ever psychologically deal with dependency? /2
Think about it some more, the US set up this financial & trade system. But whatever country becomes the biggest economy, all other countries are dependent on it.

But how can the while-culture superiority complex deal with a yellow-culture taking over THEIR "free market"? /3
Read 11 tweets
2 Nov 20
BREAKING THRU THE ILLUSION OF DEMOCRACY
[US: #Democracy or #CorporateDictatorship?]

On the topic of American democracy being fake, let’s try to remove our minds from decades of state/corporate propaganda and think objectively for a moment...
• DIRECT DEMOCRACY: The U.S. is *not* a direct democracy—at the federal level the people do not get a direct vote on the actions of the state. And at the local level, any choices that do appear are quite limited and rigged. 2/18
• REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY: The U.S. is *not* a representative democracy either—the “representatives” are not the people's, they are the representatives of corporations and entrenched state organizations. These institutions have a bigger carrot/stick than voters. 3/18
Read 19 tweets
7 Sep 20
We need to differentiate between the “communist” Chinese government (which is conservative, pragmatic, realistic)...

...and Western Marxists (which are hyper-progressivist, idealistic, post-reality).

Not the same. Almost opposites? #RectificationOfNames
2/ The Western left/right love to conflate these...

The far left treat China as their holy grail of leftism, while the Breitbart goons decry "leftist China."

But China is NOT the West, and does not map to Western thought (ideologies).
3/ Conservatism, pragmatism, and a deep grounding in reality is foundational to the Chinese thought lineage beginning w/ the Dao De Jing. It then becomes hyper-pragmatic, hundreds of years later, with Han Fei's Legalism.

This contrasts starkly with idealistic Western leftism...
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!