🧵THREAD🧵

The walls are closing in on @NYGovCuomo. Last night, news broke that his office hid 9000 Covid patients sent back to nursing homes.

Why’d it take so long to come out? I’ve got a theory: The media wasn’t interested in accountability.

Don’t believe me? Take a look👇
Some context. @AP scooped that @NYGovCuomo & his admin had hidden the number of Covid patients his rules had returned to nursing homes - spreading the pandemic among the most vulnerable - to avoid DOJ scrutiny.

Nursing homes account for 1/3rd of ALL US deaths in the pandemic.
But you would have no idea that Cuomo was anything less than perfect if you spent your time watching @CNN.

It’s really hard to overstate not just the frequency of the coverage but it’s abject lack of anything that could be called honest journalism.

I mean. Look.
The outlet got their key voices involved in pushing the idea that Cuomo was an antidote to Trump.

The way that @brianstelter talked about @NYGovCuomo mirrors how Pravda writes about Putin.
I unfairly took a swing at @ChrisCillizza yesterday. That was out of line.

But on this one. Well. I think it’s a different story. Not sure these takes aged quite perfectly.
I couldn’t possibly do this thread without including his brother, @ChrisCuomo.

Brotherly affection is one thing. But the fact that @CNN used this is a front would’ve been journalistic malpractice if (Governor) Cuomo were in the right.

Safe to say, he wasn’t.
But it’s an understatement to say that they weren’t alone here. @MSNBC may have actually been even more egregious with their fawning coverage.

That includes their covering for him about the nursing home policy (check out the second screenshot).
I keep going through these trying to decide who within the media was the worst, most uncritical booster.

I have a hard time thinking it could be anyone other than @JoyAnnReid
I have such limited space in this thread - there are so many people who helped build this deliberately misleading narrative - but I can’t help but give @JoyAnnReid two entries because what she had to say was just that bad.
But the real problem wasn’t just MSNBC or CNN, it was that EVERY outlet was singing @NYGovCuomo’s praises without raising a critical question or objection.

Here’s @ABC with a few takes they’d probably like to have back.
And it wasn’t just broadcast journalism. Print outlets got into the act, too.

This first one, billed as straight reporting from @washingtonpost, can only rightly be called propaganda.
Also, @washingtonpost, what the hell was this?
I simply don’t have the space (or mental stamina) to get to everyone in media. But these two - from @NPR and @maddow - seem to sum up the sentiment well.

And @intelligencer and @therecount, too.
Plenty of outlets like @CNBC simply gave Cuomo the space to say whatever he wanted and look like some sort of tough guy hero.

Perhaps, in retrospect, it would’ve been valuable to ask whether Cuomo’s own behavior was “irresponsible” or “reckless”?
You may be wondering where @nytimes is in all this. And the truth is, their reporting on Cuomo has been really solid across the board.

Now, some of their opinion pieces on the other hand...less so. @maureendowd and @JenSeniorNY included.
Some of the, well, less rigorous outlets were far worse. Check out @BuzzFeed.

I had to see this, so now you have to, too.
The same holds true for @HuffPost.
And the blue checks. Ohhh boy. The blue checks.

There were a lot of bad takes, and a lot of really unforgivable flattery, but @ananavarro might just have led the pack. The second one is real rich, particularly in retrospect.
And thread favorite @CheriJacobus gets bonus points for keeping it weird I suppose?
But the worst of the Cuomo sycophants had to be @JRubinBlogger.

I just. I can’t even. I don’t know what to say about all this. Heaven help anyone who takes Rubin seriously as one who offers criticism.
This really hit all of the usual suspects. But of all of them, and from behind the block, @amy_siskind was the worst. I could’ve given her a thread all of her own. Here are just my favorites.
It’s important to call out that not everyone got this wrong. I mentioned NYTimes earlier, but there was also some really strong reporting from @propublica and @NewYorker.

As I hope is clear by now, that coverage was the minority.
The early days of the pandemic were difficult to say the least. No one had much of an idea what was going on or how best to address it.

But that should lead to more questions, not fewer, from the media. Instead we got puff pieces and endless praise, all while New Yorkers died.
The media serves an enormously important role in providing accountability. They failed when it comes to @NYGovCuomo’s handling of the coronavirus.

Who knows what mistakes could’ve been avoided, and how many lives could’ve been saved, if changes had come sooner?
I wish there was a good or happy way to button this all up. But there isn’t. All we can hope for now is that there’s accountability - from the DOJ or otherwise - into the decisions made.

And some real soul searching about what good, honest journalism is supposed to mean.
Have heard from some folks that this commentary unfairly leaves out local news, who dogged Cuomo. And that’s a fair criticism. The problem was very much with national media.

On the flip side, @ABC7NY did an excellent job. Here’s a couple examples.
@NY1 was dogged, particularly on the nursing home front. Here are just a few examples.
And these two weren’t alone. @CNYCentral, @The_Citizen and @siadvance did an excellent job too.

Both their attention and their reporting were things I overlooked, but shouldn’t have. That’s on me. Local news consistently does great and thankless work, this was a highlight of it.
Also, speaking of dogged, it’s important to point out the tireless work of @JaniceDean to help keep the attention on Cuomo, particularly at the national level.
And I should’ve included the great work that NY Post did in holding Cuomo’s feet to the fire, both from their reporters and from their editorial board. Here are just a couple of examples.
I should’ve framed the distinction in this better.

Some parts of national media - esp. mainstream outlets like CNN, WaPo, etc. - did an awful job.

Many NY outlets, including the Post, the Times & local papers - did an excellent job throughout the pandemic despite circumstances.
Sometimes folks will ask if they can support these threads. The short answer is that, while I appreciate the sentiment, local food banks have been decimated by Covid & deserve your help more than I do. If you’re in DC, check out Capitol Area Food Bank: capitalareafoodbank.org/donate/?sku=20…
Also, in case you missed it, I did a thread about a month and a half ago comparing the coverage of Cuomo with @GovRonDeSantis.

Let’s just say it wasn’t exactly equal treatment.
Some folks have asked about why I think the walls are closing in on Cuomo. To me, it’s that there are more and more mainstream outlets (including some who built Cuomo up) starting to join the chorus of criticism.

Both of these are from today.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

12 Feb
Does Nikki Haley even believe Nikki Haley at this point?
thehill.com/homenews/admin…
Gonna do a thread that’s just Haley vs. Haley on all the things she’s changed her mind on.
Like whatever listen to the political consultants but maybe not make a new announcement every single time they change their mind?
Read 4 tweets
12 Feb
The way the media covered Cuomo during the pandemic is the most shameful sequence of journalism I’ve ever seen.

If you don’t believe me, I’ve got troves of receipts coming tomorrow.
Usually I wait until end of day but I think these ones gotta come out in the morning.
Read 4 tweets
9 Feb
Suspending my disbelief here for a second, is there any evidence that double-masking is meaningfully more effective than single-masking?
Have seen a lot of people ask in seeming good faith what the harm is. To me it’s pretty clear: asking or telling people to do something that is some measure of inconvenient for no good reason is bad on it’s face and fosters resentment. That’s before we get into mask scolds etc.
One of the clearest lessons through the pandemic has been that people in general and Americans in particular don’t like to be told something is helpful or important when it isn’t either. Doing so undermines trust (for good reason!) in the institutions doing the telling.
Read 4 tweets
1 Feb
So if I’m understanding the former-GOP types, we’re supposed to take:

• morality advice from those who lied us into Iraq
• political courage advice from those who protected a child predator &
• decorum advice from the original inflammatory shock jocks

Have I got that right?
There are a lot of examples of this but a few really jump out.

On the first one, the fascination with who Colin Powell, chief cheerleader of the lie that Iraq had WMDs, will vote for.

On what authority should anyone care?
This is the guy whose opinion you’d like me to put more stock into?

Okay. google.com/amp/s/static.t…
Read 9 tweets
1 Feb
I was more sympathetic to this kind of stuff in 2016.

But this is mostly bullshit childishness from people with more interest in feeling like the good guys and earning the praise of their Democratic friends than their conviction.
Parties change over time, often in ways that people won’t like. But we’ve only got two of them. Do you want to affect change? Or do you want Politico to talk about you for being brave?
Seems to me that lots and lots of political types prefer the latter. The game hasn’t gone their way and so they would prefer to pick up the ball and go home.

In my book, that probably means you’re apathetic, lazy, or a coward.
Read 5 tweets
1 Feb
A good and timely piece from @RyanTAnd, who is an under-appreciated intellectual titan on social issues.

In my five years in DC, I’ve never been as blown away by a speaker as I was the first time I heard him. Quick (and not particularly profound) story.
wsj.com/articles/relig…
When I was on the Hill, Heritage Foundation held weekly briefings for staffers. I went mostly because my boss said I should; I thought they were often too punchy and provocative, in the way that conversations among people who all agree can be.
The transgender issue is one I’ve long thought conservatives need to approach with more compassion and charity. So when I saw that there was going to be a Heritage speaker on trans-relates issues, I figured the talk would be frustrating and dispiriting at best.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!