It would be hard to beat the brazen effrontery of Portsmouth's spinmeisters. However, this extract from the VC's response to @JudithJesch and all our medievalist colleagues at Nottingham, protesting the axing of 1000+ years of English language and literature, wins hands down ...
Regarding a point Prof. Jesch made about the Midlands Viking Symposium (but ignoring other aspects of collaboration with Leicester mentioned in the letter), the VC (apparently) performs yet more casuistical gymnastics claiming that Leicester is committed to medieval scholarship
... except not in English (apparently):

In regard to the Midlands Viking Symposium, I have been informed of its work by your colleague Dr Christina Lee. Please be assured that our University remains committed to medieval scholarship ...
and to the continuation of our Medieval Research Centre and we have made investments into this area to protect and enhance its work.'
Really? Just like you have decolonized the curriculum in English, History and Law? Here's some background on 'our Medieval Research Centre'. Established in 1996, through the initiative of Prof. Greg Walker @gregmw4, Prof. Phillip Lindley and Prof. Elaine Treharne @ETreharne ...
the MRC has always been housed in and primarily financed (it mainly runs on good will) by English at Leicester, with at least one co-director from English. After the departure of Profs. Walker and Treharne, Dr Anne Marie D'Arcy acted as co-director for 10 years ...
succeeded by Dr Phil Shaw in 2018. However, current plans, as stated by the VC in a letter released to the alumni in advance of the 'consultation process', involve making all 4 medievalists redundant (though Management seems unclear how many are there: 3 or 4?) ...
This will involve ... wait for it ... 'the downsizing of the Medieval Research Centre' when 'Shaping for Excellence' reaches its endgame. We kid you not! Beat that for sheer brazen economy with the truth!
Needless to say, there is not a medievalist in the land, or indeed, worldwide, likely to fall for this one, and certainly not our learned colleagues and friends at the University of Nottingham.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Leicester UCU – No One is Redundant

Leicester UCU – No One is Redundant Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @leicesterucu

27 Jan
Some financial background to the crisis besetting our university. Formerly one of the UK’s leading pre-1992 universities, the University of Leicester made significant investments in expansion and update of its facilities pre-Covid, and was in a great deal of trouble even then.
The university, in common with many others in the UK, has been hit by a perfect storm of Brexit and Coronavirus, but this ship was already heading full steam down iceberg alley. Brexit has cut Leicester off from its main source of soft finance, the European Investment Bank.
It has been forced to resort to private placements with harder US insurance companies, who probably thought they were getting a good, safe deal for their pensioners and life policyholders: turns out, not so much.
Read 14 tweets
26 Jan
It's taken us a while to get our heads round what @uniofleicester's shaping for excellent redundancies plans might mean for @UoL_NPB (Dept of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour) because, well... let's see 1/
2/ We've had qus re external consultant DataHE's projections of student recruitment figures throughout, but didn't expect to be asking how on earth substantial projected EXPANSION of Neuroscience and Psychology teaching is to be achieved through redundancies??? #NoOneIsRedundant
3/ Also, someone else might say it looks like they plan to eliminate entire research strands/groups based on their relationship to the buildings the uni doesn't want to reopen. We're not saying this, because the pre-change engagement process lacked transparency entirely
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!