I would like to give some context for this article and to correct the record.
propublica.org/article/the-cl…
To start. One of the great paradoxes of living on an overheating planet: I'm terrified, angry, and frustrated by climate inaction, but I still enjoy life and smile and laugh a lot. I'm not depressed at all. The photographers told us not to smile. We smiled in many of the pictures
Climate emotions are complex and personal. I know climate depression is real but I don't think we "should" or "shouldn't" be depressed over climate. It's just a fact that I am not. I was depressed while in college and I am vigilant not to slip back into that. It paralyzed me.
I'm grateful to @lizweil for the piece because it touched so many people. I got dozens (100+?) of heartfelt messages from people on how much it meant to them, how they felt less alone. I knew I was just grist for the story. I knew making myself that vulnerable was a risk.
Sharon and I were both completely honest and open; we both hold truth as a high principle (also why I need to write this thread). I also know that I am a flawed human doing his best on a planet that is heating up fast. This is why "ClimateHuman." I've never claimed to be perfect.
The backpacking trip was a short overnighter. We completed it - we had to get to our campsite for water. It was blazing hot but also crazy humid. Another hiker died down the coast from where we were on Sunday. Both Saturday and Sunday were searing.
cnn.com/2020/09/07/us/….
Why were we out there? I had foolishly assumed that it would be cooler next to the ocean than at our house. I wasn't careful. Sharon really wanted to hike. I'm pretty sure my older son and I both experienced heat exhaustion. I've never felt anything like it.
I've lived in SoCal since autumn 2008, and over that time I haven't needed any analysis to know that extreme heat has been getting worse. My body has been registering this over those 12 years. That's how fast it's changing.
"But Peter’s kids were pissed and his wife was pissed"

My older son Braird is pissed every time we hike, but this time he was heat-exhausted. Neither Sharon or Zane were pissed. (They both handled the heat without heat exhaustion btw.) This sentence was an assumption.
This is gorgeous writing, and true. It was an emotional moment. But with the caveat that "massively depressed" has nothing to do with clinical depression. It was just a really shitty moment for me and connected, bodily, to my climate angst.
For the record: I was speaking on my own behalf, and I always ask not to be identified as working at NASA/JPL in major media venues. Something I hate doing - since it is just a fact. Also it was a 1984 Mercedes, not 1985, but who cares.
The "fossil fuel noise" comment was because, during the interviews, Liz and I both thought it was likely going to be an audio piece, not a print piece. I do hate all the fossil fuel noise, though, it is constant and everywhere. It would be a more beautiful world without it!
"He had more twinkle in his eye..." that's the thing. some of you will hate me for even this, but the fact is that although I know how bad it is, I'm still a happy person overall. (the key, for me, is serious meditation - if I stop meditating, debilitating anxiety creeps in)
Liz picked perhaps the angriest, most angsty tweet I've ever tweeted, and it was an excellent choice for this piece. Of course I do write lots and lots of not-angry tweets too. Just look through my timeline.
I don't think "near-term human extinction" is likely. The clause "as we know it" is really important here. I DO believe global heating is likely to change almost every aspect of human (and nonhuman) life on Earth - indeed there is overwhelming evidence it already is.
"For the next eight months, Peter walked around Manhattan, 'freaking out in my brain'..." Guess what, 15 years later and still freaking out in there. But living with it, and trying my best to create change.
OK, so the evolution of my climate concern has been gradual. At the gathering mentioned here, I just said my hope was that he never has to shoot at anyone or be shot at, and that he always has enough to eat. I don't think I mentioned climate explicitly (but it was in my mind).
I've taken criticism for having two kids, which was a mutual decision in our marriage. Back in 2005-2007, I still thought there was every chance that people would wake up big time, like I was in the process of doing, and act! Climate breakdown didn't seem so locked in.
And anyway, it's an unkind thing to ask a father to feel shame about his two beautiful sons. I can't imagine life without them. Plus there's a real chance I wouldn't be doing everything I could to stop this train wreck if they hadn't come along. They changed me, opened me up.
Liz's speculations on why we had two kids are just speculations. The reason we had two kids is that c. 2006 we both thought that civilizations's basic assumption - that the future will be like the present - was still valid. I still thought scientific evidence would wake people up
The night I figured my emissions I was feeling curious more than anything else. When you realize you don't know something it can be surprising, and I didn't know how my actions in daily life translated to climate impact. The fossil fuel disgust I feel has deepened over the years.
In ~2010 climate impact of everyday actions was not good public knowledge. So many lame list-articles on "10 things you can do for the climate" telling people to make sure to unplug cellphone chargers, but not mentioning flying, etc. Not quantitative. Annoying to a scientist.
OK, the poop composting. It's actually a wonderful, profound, hygienic practice. But if you're dead-set against it I will never convince you. Anyway in case you want to learn more about it, and why it's awesome, here you go:
peterkalmus.net/books/read-by-…
The point is that for me, overall, living with less energy (and emissions) is pretty great, in lots of ways. I am extremely well-aware that our "individual actions" alone will not halt climate breakdown.
I still prefer burning less, though, because I know that fossil fuel is literally deadly. Also, it does help with systems change because it helps revoke the social license of fossil fuel and fossil fuel people. There is no bright line between "individual" and "collective."
Sharon (@naturegrrrrl btw) didn't "hate name" Maeby, it was just funny. That old car, a socket set, and carefully chosen spare parts always did get us where we wanted to go. If I could do it over again, though, I don't know if I'd drive on veggie oil. My family did hate it.
I am totally with Sharon on this. The music lessons do feel weird, but I love music and think it's great. As I said above, meditation is also a really important part of my life.
Sharon was actually talking specifically about Roy Scranton here, the author of the book "We're Doomed, Now What," so this is out of context.
My son said "I try not to think about it." I gave Liz the incorrect line and I wish I'd checked with Braird (I'd already probably put in like 12 hours on this project, lots of moving parts). Anyway, I felt compassion and concern, not even slightly like he'd "sunk a dagger."
The part about our fight is pretty accurate. I was a jerk, and I've apologized. It was a bad fight in an overall great marriage. I didn't "decide now would be a good time" though, I was just stressed past a breaking point by all the recent visceral lived reality of global heating
Our marriage is stronger because of it. I'd been repressing, and repressing creates resentment. Sometimes a fight can be a good thing. We love each other very much, and we are partners on this path, and this is a tough time for "normalcy" I think.
More gorgeous writing from @lizweil, from here to the end of the piece. I think she achieved something great here. Anyway, judge me, don't judge me, whatever. Just please act.♥️
Here's her brilliant review of it:
lareviewofbooks.org/contributor/sh…
Also FWIW we probably captured 6 or 8 hours of interview, and a LOT of that was discussing systems change, capitalism, degrowth, theories of change, etc. Wish at least some of that stuff could have made it in. I am pretty big on systems change.
btw I study other stuff too. the thing that ties it all together for me is satellite data: figuring out how to make it better, and to use it better in science applications. I started out looking at clouds and now I'm increasingly interested in extreme weather and biodiversity.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Kalmus

Peter Kalmus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateHuman

5 Feb
I just read the ProPublica article (I got back yesterday after 10 days of being disconnected). Overall, I think it's good but one-sided. I'm not remotely depressed, there's a lot of joy in our household, and we don't really look this emo!
propublica.org/article/the-cl…
I think climate emotions run the gamut. In my case, as opposed to being depressed, I'm afraid, frustrated, and furious - with brief intense spikes of grief thrown in every month or so for good measure.
Also, yeah, low-energy living comes with tough lessons, but it's also fun. I LOVE gardening and growing fruit trees! And you do need lots of compost to do that well... I was actually a decent chicken-keeper, back when I did it. And dumpster diving is better than you think
Read 6 tweets
1 Jan
OK here's some great news to end 2020!

It turns out that 68% of humans, if given the choice, would choose to only extract from nature what can be regenerated, leaving plenty for future generations. So we're not all greedy bastards.
The problem, of course, is that 32% of us would choose to extract everything immediately and convert it to profit for themselves. They end up extremely rich and can easily capture the media, the financial system, and our politics.

Sound familiar?
This guarantees ecological crisis and overshoot after a few generations.

These results are from a 2014 study by researchers at Harvard and Yale:
nature.com/articles/natur…
Read 6 tweets
30 Dec 20
Our current system prioritizes corporate profits and the accumulation of vast wealth and power in the hands of a few, whereas I imagine a system that prioritizes people and the planet and which is far more equitable. My imperfect label for the former system is "capitalism."
I think the next big thing in the climate movement will be mainstreaming the idea that we can't come out of climate and ecological breakdown without shifting the goal away from profit & accumulation and toward people & planet. That is, to end "capitalism"
The Green New Deal is an important stepping stone but I think we need to go further - we need to actually change the goal of the entire system. The goal can no longer be profit & massive accumulation & desperate consumption, it needs to be happy humans on a healthy planet.
Read 8 tweets
22 Dec 20
Here are a few of the most impactful climate books I've read. First up: "Less is More" by @jasonhickel. Yes, we CAN organize society around human thriving instead of further enriching billionaires. Yes, we DO need to deal w growthism to stop climate and ecological breakdown.
Next, "Braiding Sweetgrass" by Robin Wall Kimmerer. Such a tour de force melding of science, indigenous wisdom, and poetry. I dare you to read it without crying. Especially the elders as last living remnants of their mother tongues, and how language is so much more than language.
"Merchants of Doubt" by @NaomiOreskes and @ErikMConway (who happens to be a colleague of mine at the space lab). The classic exposé of the evil scholars who create confusion and delay in support of deadly corporate malfeasance with their lies. Yes, evil.
Read 7 tweets
7 Dec 20
Why is hunger skyrocketing, when almost half of food produced is thrown into landfills and the stock market is soaring?
Why is it so hard to get healthcare for all, even during a pandemic, even when the policy is so popular? Why is healthcare still tied to employment? Certainly, industry profits and money in politics. But it's even deeper.
Those who control the capital seek to create scarcity - or rather, the illusion of scarcity, by artificially preventing access - so as to force the workers into what amounts to wage slavery and drive exponential growth, which is also destroying the Earth's living systems.
Read 7 tweets
10 Oct 20
We need a billion climate activists. No one can tell you how to be a climate activist; that's up to you to figure out. But here are a few suggestions.
First, find a local group of activists to join - or better yet, two or three. You need to find your people: people who share a similar set of goals as you, people you like and who are working toward something you believe in.
These activists will become your friends and co-conspirators. Logistically and emotionally, climate activism is too hard to do alone. You need support, and your voice will be more powerful when joined with your group.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!