primary concerns re COVID are: fatalities, ICU &hospitalization, which vary by age group. Not easy finding data granular enough to examine interactions. Nor are such details discussed collectively (as they should) in Ontario science briefings. Here is (hard-won) Toronto summary.
while COVID impact on ICUs has been a (if not the) primary focus of "Science Table" briefings, the number of fatalities is about 2.5 times higher than number of people who've gone to ICU. Mostly people over 80 who've died in community or in non-ICU hospital wards.
fatality rates of over 80s (and over 70s) in ICUs is very high: 70% (61%) respectively, while recovery rate of under 50s is very high (86%).
whereas the number of fatalities is concentrated in over80s, the largest cohorts in ICU are 60-69 and 70-79.
my takeaway from looking at this data in an overall way is that, to be blunt, ICUs are involved in only a very small percentage of COVID cases and need to be considered in a spectrum of options, rather than as the central policy issue.
here's a better diagram of impacts by age group. Vast majority of cases, especially in younger ages recover without hospitalization. Left panel shows outcomes for all cases; right panel for cases in which hospitalization/fatality occur. ICU and fatality patterns are not the same.
2/ case loads among over-80s come disproportionately from LTCs. So vaccinations in LTCs will have an immediate impact on severe outcomes - whereas vaccinations of under-40 HCWs, deserving as they are, will have negligible impact on severe outcomes.
3/ however, ICU occupancy is concentrated more in 60-79 age group than in over-80s. This age group is less represented in LTCs. It is unfortunate that we don't have data on accommodation circumstances of 60-79s entering ICU.
4/ speaking as a 73-year old, I would prefer that society not lockdown on my behalf and that people of my generation take precautions to stay out of harm's way as much as possible and that vaccine priority be given to those that do not have that option.
5/ another age group graphic for Toronto, additionally disaggregating LTC (predominant form of "Outbreak"). Vaccinating the very small number of people in Toronto LTCs (~14K) by itself should immediately cut serious outcomes (ICU/Fatality) by ~50%.
6/ that public health advisors and ethicists chose not to allocate very first 14K vaccines to this population defies all logic.
7/ But now that they've been vaccinated, issue is moot - other than some backbiting from public health scientists complaining that govt didnt vaccinate LTCs soon enough - even though these priorities had been set by public health advisors themselves. A bunch of mini-Faucis.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen McIntyre

Stephen McIntyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateAudit

11 Feb
the oh-so-woke Ontario Science Table presented graphs purporting to show share of LTC of total deaths (left) and ICU (right). According to these figures, LTC accounts for substantial majority of deaths (~70%) but micro-fraction of ICU admissions. Has this been observed elsewhere?
2/ on its face, this figure contradicts a claim that I've been making: that vaccinating vulnerable in LTC would be effective means of mitigating concerns over projected ICU overcrowding. But is figure correct?
3/ if figure is correct, this seems like pretty fundamental information for policy-makers. So why havent Ontario science advisors ever mentioned it previously?
Read 4 tweets
11 Feb
on Jan 21, 2021, just as vaccine supply in Canada dried up, Science Table, Ontario's woke COVID advisors, belatedly urged that govt to accelerate vaccination of LTC residents (relative to young HCWs outside LTC residences). Exactly what I'd urged on Dec 22
covid19-sciencetable.ca/sciencebrief/t…
2/ even this belated recognition by woke Science Table omitted the main reason why vulnerable 80+s, especially LTC 80"s, deserved priority even ahead of young HCWs: its direct impact on hospitalizations given expected pending hospital crisis
3/ I said this not to disparage contribution of young doctors, HCWs in ICUs. My father was a surgeon, two nieces are doctors. My family has benefited greatly from prompt and inspired care in Toronto ICUs. My point was policy: vaccinating seniors was best way to avert ICU crisis
Read 5 tweets
9 Feb
amidst COVID projection porn by Ontario "Science Table", actual data on new cases in Ontario LTC homes has had spectacular decline since early Jan, when govt figured out that LTC residents were getting shortchanged in allocation by public health (relative to hospital admin etc)
2/ yesterday, there were only 11 new cases among LTC residents (14 - Feb 17), down from 160-200 daily at beginning of January. In Dec, nearly all vaccines appear to have been appropriated by young HCWs - meritorious but not nearly as vulnerable as LTC residents.
3/ because hospitalization rates are extremely high for cases among seniors, esp 80+ seniors, such a dramatic reduction in LTC cases should have immediate and observable impact on hospitalization rates. Which have gone down dramatically as well.
Read 4 tweets
6 Feb
on Dec 21, faced with projections of 15-30,000 new cases daily by Jan 24 and threats of impossible burden on ICUs, Ontario went into moderate lockdown. Whether due to this policy or otherwise, new cases remained under 3000 at Jan 12, declining to 2200 by Jan 24.
2/ nonetheless, on Jan 12, Science Table, Ontario science advisors took time out from worrying about microaggressions at University of Toronto to declare that policy failing. They presented new projections, this time projecting up to 45000 new cases by mid-Feb.
3/ As on Dec 21, they showed extrapolations at daily growth rates of 3%, 5% and 7%, even though there had been negligible increase in daily new cases since Dec 21. On right, I added Dec 21 projections plus 2 days of actuals not shown by Science Table.
Read 8 tweets
6 Feb
Chris Rentsch - not a climate scientist - has done an astounding calculation that, for some reason, Gavin Schmidt and climate "community" have failed to do. He's used absorption spectra over past 18 years to measure CO2 forcing.
2/ CO2 absorption spectra have long been used as evidence of existence of CO2 greenhouse effect, but measuring change in CO2 absorption spectra over time and on a global basis is a very non-trivial calculation. Rentsch has done it.
3/ even if there were no immediate implications for the overall debate, this would be an important and praiseworthy accomplishment. If the calculation showed that things were "worse than we thought", Rentsch would almost certainly been feted by scientific societies.
Read 5 tweets
6 Feb
it's now 14 days since Ontario received any COVID vaccines from feckless Trudeau government. Nearly all vaccines in this period have been 2nd doses. So NO NEW vaccinations are taking place.
yesterday, CCODWG reported that Ontario got 26325 vaccines on Feb 4 - the only delivery in past 16 days. These will presumably be used for 2nd doses. New vaccinations are at standstill for more than 2 weeks. github.com/ccodwg/Covid19…
one of the contributing factors to Canadian vaccine drought is that Canadian bureaucrats, none of whom have lost a day's pay, haven't approved the AstraZeneca vaccine which is being widely used in UK (and where we made large advance purchase.)

ctvnews.ca/politics/once-…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!