X : Is map camp happening?
Me : Yep. Plan is for Wed, Oct 13th. Three tracks using the same triad format as last year.
X : Three tracks?
Me : Yep. Three themes - sustainability, diversity and good.
X : Good?
Me : Yep. Do good. Maps for good. It's not enough to do no evil.
There has always been a strong positive approach in the mapping community. Yes, maps can be used for profit, to outwit competitors etc ... but there's more to mapping than that. There's more to society than just the economy. We need to up the tempo a bit.
X : Don't you have to define what good is?
Me : The ethics of care versus the ethics of choice, the balance between me versus we ... this is the debate we (as a collective) need to have.
X : Sponsors?
Me : Yes. We will be looking for sponsors especially for the three major themes - sustainability, diversity and good.
X : A sponsor for good?
Me : Oh yes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Whilst there is debate over causes, the hypothesis is generally considered "reasonable", published by the BMJ from research at UCL ... of course, in this post truth world anyone can declare this as myth, nonsense and "provably untrue" which is itself untrue. It is undecided ->
Alas, this is the problem with unsettled matters. Even with settled matters where scientific consenus is decided, some can always say "prove it" and point to ever more extreme counterfactuals which have to be disproved, slowly, one by one - see climate change.
The same tactics are being used by another group of extremists to try and counter lockdown. Whilst there are counterfactuals, the scientific consensus is reasonably settled on the benefits but that won't stop those individuals from peddling their beliefs as the truth.
X : What's your view on bitcoin?
Me : Kidding? Still the same as it was in 2013 when I mapped the space. A payload of laissez faire, a delivery mechanism of greed.
X : So, it'll go up?
Me : Oh god. Why would anyone want this - blog.gardeviance.org/2013/11/a-spoi… ... oh yes, greed.
X : But ...
Me : No buts. As per 2013, the exception is China which will become "the capital and innovation superpower with extensive and virtually untraceable investments in all countries, a mixed economy model and high levels of social mobility, social cohesion and stability"
X : You seem very bullish on China.
Me : Bullish has nothing to do with it. China Gov just plays a better game. When I looked in 2015, I never managed to find the group that was co-ordinating it. There's some real skill at play, started by Deng Xiaoping and continued on.
X : Did you say the future is serverless.
Me : Yes and the new practices, new needs met ... but that was quite a few years ago. Why?
X : Do you think there is room for another serverless play?
Me : Oh, that war is over. In the West, it's AWS (1st), MSFT (2nd).
X : What do you mean it's over.
Me : It's over. The battle started 7 years ago, it's finished. Winners declared etc. It's just the washup now.
X : What about Kubernetes?
Me : I thought it was amazing that Amazon got a 7 year head start in IaaS ...
... I couldn't believe it when AWS was given another 7 year head start in serverless whilst everyone messed around with Kubernetes. I mean, get it wrong once is ok but twice? They must have been laughing.
X : There is no value in Kubernetes.
Me : Oh, there's money to be made ...
X : Why do you like the map so much?
Me : The same tools that allow us to radicalise, to mobilise and to manipulate online causing so much political chaos are the same tools which allow us to challenge orthodoxy in healthcare, in finance and in economics.
X : What is the argument against national cloud?
Me : See Texas. End of story.
X : Explain?
Me : You attempt to localise services for reasons of "sovereignty" without understanding the wider landscape then you expose yourself to new threats and weakness. Co-operation and distribution are your friends for any infrastructural service.
X : Infrastructural?
Me : Any commodity or utility component that are consumed by other components in a chain whether compute, water, electricity or transport components like road, rail etc.
X : Thoughts on digital sovereignty?
Me : Blah, blah, blah.
X : Eh?
Me : Most people talk a lot of nonsense when it comes to digital sovereignty. One of my least favourite topics filled with hand waving political consultants pretending to be generals - swardley.medium.com/digital-sovere…
... it's up there with the old "let's create an industrial policy without any understanding of the landscape" wheeze ... endless hand waving and posturing by people who haven't got a clue and shouldn't be allowed to run a booze up in a brewery (see Vince Cable).
X : You don't like Vince Cable?
Me : I struggle to think of a minister who was more useless. In an era of titans like Francis Maude then Cable was out of his depth and it showed.