"Your answers on disability, ethnicity, sex, other characteristics will feed into official statistics used to plan public services. so the aim is that we collect data which is as accurate as possible. "
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting on censuses, biological data, social norms and shame ....
One of the questions in the 1971 census is the number of children a woman has had
But it only asked about children born in marriage
Presumably at the time it was felt to be too sensitive to ask about children born outside of marriage - who might have been adopted, brought up within the wider family etc... certainly not something to talk about on the doorstep.
Transsexuality used to be a bit like this - something shameful, not to be talked about, with the idea that a person would want to live 'in stealth'.
But social norms - on children borne outside of wedlock, and gender non-conformity change
One of the things in census design is also making sure that relationships between the questions are consistent
- with the modern census they use computer power to weed out errors like people who listed as under 16 and in full time work , or women giving birth over 65 etc...
The census asks about relationships between people in the household
In 1971 they put this as the "Head" of the household (i.e. the husband/father if their was one) and the wife.
Men are representing women
Men are taking womens places
Men are dictating language women can use
Men are breaching womens boundaries.
Men are rewriting rules for what women may & may not do
And yet we are forbidden from pointing to a single man doing this & stating "He is a man"
And in response to one declaring "we all need to listen to each other to understand how we can make progress together"